JUDGE REINSTATES $12 BILLION APPEAL BOND AGAINST PHILIP MORRIS.Madison County Madison County is the name of twenty counties in the United States, named after President James Madison:
A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax brought by smokers who claimed the company had misled them over how it marketed light cigarettes as less harmful than regular brands. After ordering the bond in March, Byron had cut the bond in half in April after the company said it would be forced into bankruptcy if it had to pay the full amount. But last month the Illinois Fifth District Court of Appeals ordered Byron to reconsider his decision. Philip Morris has appealed the Fifth District's ruling in Sharon Price and Michael Fruth et al. v. Philip Morris to the Illinois Supreme Court, arguing Byron had authority to reduce the bond. The plaintiffs' attorney, Stephen Tillery, who is with the Illinois firm of Carr Korein Tillery, had appealed Byron's decision to cut the bond in half, saying Illinois court rules require defendants who want to appeal to post a bond equal to the size of the judgment plus costs and interest. Byron had ordered Philip Morris to pay $7.1 billion in compensatory damages A sum of money awarded in a civil action by a court to indemnify a person for the particular loss, detriment, or injury suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of another. to smokers who had bought Marlboro Light or Cambridge Light cigarettes between 1971 and February 2001 and $3 billion in punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. to the state. Byron agreed to reduce the bond after Philip Morris argued paying the bond would force it to default on its payment to the states as required under the nationwide $206 billion tobacco settlement and attorneys general from 37 states and territories urged him to reduce it before the company's next payment to the states became due on April 15. When he decided to reduce the bond, he agreed Philip Morris should pay an initial $6 billion on the appeal bond, an additional $800 million in 2004 and $420 million for each year the appeal takes. In addition to its appeal to the Supreme Court, Philip Morris tried to get the state legislature A state legislature may refer to a legislative branch or body of a political subdivision in a federal system. The following legislatures exist in the following political subdivisions: Byron is the first judge to hear a class action suit about the dangers of smoking light cigarettes. In his decision, he wrote, "The Court finds that based upon Philip Morris' course of conduct with respect to the representations of "Lowered Tar tar: see tar and pitch. (Tape ARchive) A Unix utility that is used to archive files by combining several files into one. It is often used in conjunction with the "compress" or "gzip" commands to compress the data. and Nicotine nicotine, C10H14N2, poisonous, pale yellow, oily liquid alkaloid with a pungent odor and an acrid taste. It turns brown on exposure to air. " and "Lights" that Philip Morris' practices offend public policy, are immoral, unethical unethical said of conduct not conforming with professional ethics. , oppressive and unscrupulous and that this course of conduct caused a substantial injury to the Class members of this case. "Therefore, the Court finds that Philip Morris has violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act...The course of conduct by Philip Morris related to its fraud in this case is outrageous, both because Philip Morris' motive was evil and the acts showed a reckless disregard reckless disregard n. grossly negligent without concern for danger to others. Actually reckless disregard is redundant since reckless means there is a disregard for safety. (See: reckless) for the consumers' rights." Tillery has filed a similar class action against R.J. Reynolds, which is scheduled to go to trial Oct. 21. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion