Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,487,687 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

JUDGE REFUSES TO REINSTATE DISCRIMINATION CASE.


Byline: Charles F. Bostwick Staff Writer

PALMDALE - A federal appeals court has refused to reinstate ousted Palmdale School District official Diana Beard-Williams' racial discrimination lawsuit against school officials.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit ruled that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by throwing out the lawsuit when Beard-Williams failed to appear in court for cross-examination by the school district's attorney.

``Although Beard-Williams sent a doctor's note on the third day of her absence, the court was not required to credit this letter, which was not written under penalty of perjury perjury n. the crime of intentionally lying after being duly sworn (to tell the truth) by a notary public, court clerk or other official. This false statement may be made in testimony in court, administrative hearings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, as well as by signing or acknowledging a written legal document (such as affidavit, declaration under penalty of perjury, deed, license application, tax return) known to contain false information.,'' said the appellate ruling from Circuit Judges Robert Beezer, Ferdinand Fernandez and Richard Paez.

Because dismissal was proper, the appellate justices said they did not review Beard-Williams' other allegations, including charges that the judge was biased against her and made errors in court, that her own attorney inadequately represented her and that the school district's attorney intentionally mischaracterized issues in court.

In the ruling filed April 24, the appellate justices also denied school officials' request that Beard-Williams be ordered to repay $267,000 spent on school district attorney fees.

The appellate justices said the trial judge was correct in deciding that Beard-Williams need not pay the district attorney fees because her lawsuit was not frivolous.

Palmdale School District superintendent Nancy Smith said she was pleased at the outcome and doubts that Beard-Williams could get a hearing before the Supreme Court, if she decides to take it that far.

``We're very pleased this part of it's over,'' Smith said.

The district's share of the $267,000 for its attorneys' fees were $5,000, Smith added. The rest was paid by a self-insurance fund created by the Palmdale School District and 17 other school districts, she said.

Beard-Williams said the appellate ruling, by denying the school district's request for attorney fees, confirmed that she had not sued the district frivolously.

``I had a case; I just had no way to litigate it,'' she said. ``The only thing I want was to affirm the case was not frivolous and it did have merit.''

To settle a separate workers' compensation case against the school district, Beard-Williams said she was paid $50,000 plus medical bills and other expenses earlier this year.

Beard-Williams was fired in April 1999 from her $59,347-a-year job as public relations director of the Palmdale School District and executive director of the Palmdale Education Foundation.

She said she was discriminated against because she is an African- American woman and because she complained about what she called fraudulent spending on the Palmdale Head Start preschool program.

School officials said she harassed co-workers, mishandled foundation financial records and refused to obey the superintendent.

Her racial discrimination lawsuit was dismissed Oct. 19, 2001, by U.S. District Court Judge A. Howard Matz after she failed to show up in court for three days.

Beard-Williams' husband gave the judge a note from her psychiatrist that stated it was not advisable for her to appear in court. The judge said he believed that Beard-Williams stayed away because she expected that if the jury issued a verdict it would go against her.

Beard-Williams' attorney had quit the previous day, after Beard-Williams faxed the news media a letter criticizing her performance in court.

Beard-Williams said Wednesday that the note from her psychiatrist was not written under penalty of perjury, but that an earlier declaration from another doctor was.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Apr 30, 2003
Words:570
Previous Article:CSUB-AV GAINS PERMANENT STATUS.(News)
Next Article:HOME IS WHERE THE ART IS GALLERY TO FEATURE HOUSE-BUILDING ARTIST.(News)



Related Articles
Blind social worker wins wrongful termination case.(North Carolina)
Keating Ruling Stands.(U.S. Supreme Court refuses to reopen case agains Charles H. Keating Jr.)(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included)
Court allows sex bias claim of anatomical male with female self-image.
SCHOOL SUER SPARED COSTS.(News)
RETIRED AGENT BATTLES FBI OVER AGE BIAS SIX-YEAR LEGAL FIGHT DRAGS ON.(News)
COURT TO HEAR CASES ON FIRINGS AFTER DISABILITY : WORKERS CLAIM DISCRIMINATION.(NEWS)
NINTH CIRCUIT JOINS OTHERS IN UPHOLDING ARBITRATION CLAUSES.
Make shots voluntary.(Editorials)(Judge halts military's anthrax program)(Editorial)
To reach settlement, lawyer must have 'actual authority'.
Age ruling.(September 10-16)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles