JUDGE BACKS CHARITY GROUPS' RIGHTS AT LAX.Byline: Janet Gilmore Daily News Staff Writer Hare Krishnas Hare Krishnas (här`ē krĭsh`nəz), communalistic religious movement, officially known as the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. Founded in New York City (1966) by A. C. and other charitable groups can continue soliciting money at Los Angeles International Airport “LAX” redirects here. For other uses, see LAX (disambiguation). “KLAX” redirects here. For other uses, see KLAX (disambiguation). Los Angeles International Airport (IATA: LAX, ICAO: KLAX, FAA LID: LAX , under a court order issued Friday. U.S. District Court Judge John G. Davies granted a preliminary injunction A temporary order made by a court at the request of one party that prevents the other party from pursuing a particular course of conduct until the conclusion of a trial on the merits. A preliminary injunction is regarded as extraordinary relief. that blocks Los Angeles from prohibiting charitable solicitation at the airport. The ordinance was set to take effect May 15 and would bar people from asking for contributions at LAX and on surrounding sidewalks and parking lots. Barry A. Fisher, an attorney representing the charitable groups, said Davies issued the order after a hearing attended by roughly a dozen members of the Hare Krishnas and the Committee for Human Rights in Iran Today, the state of human rights in Iran continues to be generally considered a source of significant concern. Despite many efforts by Iranian human right activists, writers, NGOs and international critiques as well as several resolutions by the UN General Assembly and the UN Human . Bret Lobner, a deputy Los Angeles city attorney The Los Angeles City Attorney is an elected official whose job is to prosecute all of the misdemeanor criminal offenses within the city of Los Angeles, California, United States. , declined to comment about the case until he sees the judge's written order. He also declined to say whether the city will appeal the ruling. Fisher contended that the City Council's rationale for the ordinance - that travelers were annoyed by solicitation - is insufficient reason to ban that activity. Fisher contends that small, fledgling groups depend on airport solicitation for their livelihoods, and it is against the First Amendment for city officials to ban financial solicitation yet allow groups to approach airport passers-by if the discussion does not involve money. ``You can't pick and choose the speech or the subject matter,'' Fisher said. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion