Isaiah 1-39: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. (Briefly Noted).Isaiah 1-39: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. By Joseph Blenkinsopp (Doubleday, $50). This recent volume in the Anchor Bible commentary series brings excellent historical critical and philological phi·lol·o·gy n. 1. Literary study or classical scholarship. 2. See historical linguistics. [Middle English philologie, from Latin philologia, love of learning tools to the task of exegesis exegesis Scholarly interpretation of religious texts, using linguistic, historical, and other methods. In Judaism and Christianity, it has been used extensively in the study of the Bible. Textual criticism tries to establish the accuracy of biblical texts. and will be followed by a second volume by B. on Isaiah 40-66. While B. admits that there are late redactional links between the first and last chapters of the book of Isaiah Noun 1. Book of Isaiah - an Old Testament book consisting of Isaiah's prophecies Isaiah Old Testament - the collection of books comprising the sacred scripture of the Hebrews and recording their history as the chosen people; the first half of the Christian , he opposes the idea that Second Isaiah was written by a school of devotees to the Isaianic tradition and concludes that Second Isaiah's concern for the reconstruction of Jerusalem made a good fit with the single-minded concentration on the doomed fate of the city in chaps. 1-39. He stands opposed to advocates of a closer relationship between the two books (such as Hugh Williamson Hugh Williamson (December 5, 1735–May 22, 1819) was an American politician. He is best known for representing North Carolina at the Constitutional Convention. Williamson was a scholar of international renown. , Brevard Childs, and Christopher Seitz). B. is a good, reliable, and relatively succinct guide to the intricacies of this prophet, though, given the complexities of the book's origin and exegetical ex·e·get·ic also ex·e·get·i·cal adj. Of or relating to exegesis; critically explanatory. ex problems, no one woul d be expected to agree with his every move. (I tend to doubt, for example, that "Immanuel" is a good omen in 7:14 or that B. has correctly understood the messianic titles in 9:6.) Still, if I were asked to name the best current commentary on Isaiah 1-39, this would be it. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion