Is division of an IRA a taxable event?Generally the transfer of property from one spouse to another due to a divorce is a nontaxable exchange under IRC (Internet Relay Chat) Computer conferencing on the Internet. There are hundreds of IRC channels on numerous subjects that are hosted on IRC servers around the world. After joining a channel, your messages are broadcast to everyone listening to that channel. section 1041. IRC section 408(d)(6) further states that the transfer of an individual's interest in an individual retirement account (IRA Ira, in the Bible Ira (ī`rə), in the Bible. 1 Chief officer of David. 2, 3 Two of David's guard. IRA, abbreviation IRA. ) to a former spouse also is a nontaxable event. Norma Cohen cohen or kohen (Hebrew: “priest”) Jewish priest descended from Zadok (a descendant of Aaron), priest at the First Temple of Jerusalem. The biblical priesthood was hereditary and male. received a divorce in 1997 under an agreement that postponed to a later date any resolution of the financial matters. In June 1999 the Superior Court of New Jersey ordered that an IRA previously established by her ex-husband in his name should be divided equally. The IRA had assets of about $120,000. In July 1999 Cohen opened an IRA in her own name, into which her ex-husband transferred $60,000 from his IRA. Late in 1999, Cohen requested the $60,000 be withdrawn from her IRA in a check payable to her. She endorsed the check over to her ex-spouse to purchase his remaining interest in the former marital Pertaining to the relationship of Husband and Wife; having to do with marriage. Marital agreements are contracts that are entered into by individuals who are about to be married, are already married, or are in the process of ending a marriage. home. She did not report the $60,000 distribution on her 1999 tax return. She believed the $60,000 transfer from her ex-husband's IRA represented a distribution from his IRA that was taxable to him and a subsequent $60,000 cash transfer of marital assets to her IRA. She then had a $60,000 basis in her IRA, which made the $60,000 withdrawal from her IRA a tax-free distribution. The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. disagreed. Cohen petitioned the Tax Court for relief. Result. For the IRS. Cohen argued the $60,000 transfer did not satisfy the requirements of section 408(d)(6) since the court order had directed an equal division of the $120,000 IRA but had not required a new IRA be established to receive the rollover A graphic element in an application or on a Web page that changes its color or shape when the pointer is moved (rolled) over it. See JavaScript rollover. See also n-key rollover. . Therefore the transfer should have been taxable to her ex-husband. The Tax Court disagreed, saying the court order clearly had instructed her ex-husband to transfer a 50% interest in his IRA to her; therefore the requirements of section 408(d)(6) were satisfied. The taxpayer also argued the Tax Court should follow its decision in Czepiel v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1999-289, holding that an IRA transfer IRA transfer The direct transfer of assets in an individual retirement account from one trustee to another. With an IRA transfer, the investor does not take physical possession of the IRA assets; thus, there are no tax consequences to the movement of the was taxable to the ex-husband. The Tax Court also rejected this argument. In Czepiel, the taxpayer was ordered under a divorce decree decree, in law, decision of a suit in a court of equity. It is the counterpart in equity of the judgment in a court of law, although in those jurisdictions where law and equity have merged, judgment is sometimes used to include both. to pay his ex-wife $29,000 as a "further division of marital property." Due to financial difficulties, he withdrew funds from his IRA and paid the amount to his ex-wife. No transfer from the IRA had been required by the divorce decree. The Tax Court held that the $29,000 was taxable to Mr. Czepiel since he had received the funds from his IRA. However, in this case, the $60,000 transfer from the IRA of Cohen's ex-husband was due to the division of the IRA ordered by the divorce decree. Therefore, the transfer was tax-free to Cohen's ex-husband, and she had a zero basis in the IRA. Cohen also had to pay the 10% penalty tax for an early withdrawal from an IRA. * Norma A. Cohen v. Commissioner, TC Memo, 2004-227. Prepared by Charles J. Reichert, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , professor of accounting, University of Wisconsin, Superior. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion