Introduction.Background On April 23, 1990, Congress passed the Hate Crime Statistics Act The Hate Crime Statistics Act, 28 USC 534, requires the Attorney General to collect data on crimes committed because of the victim's race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. The bill was signed into law by George H. W. . This law required the Attorney General to collect data "about crimes that manifest manifest 1) adj., adv. completely obvious or evident. 2) n. a written list of goods in a shipment. MANIFEST, com. law. A written instrument containing a true account of the cargo of a ship or commercial vessel. 2. evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, sexual orientation sexual orientation n. The direction of one's sexual interest toward members of the same, opposite, or both sexes, especially a direction seen to be dictated by physiologic rather than sociologic forces. , or ethnicity ethnicity Vox populi Racial status–ie, African American, Asian, Caucasian, Hispanic ." The Attorney General delegated the responsibilities of developing the procedures for implementing, collecting, and managing hate crime data to the Director of the FBI, who in turn assigned the tasks to the UCR (Under Color Removal) A method for reducing the amount of printing ink used. It substitutes black for gray color (equal amounts of cyan, magenta and yellow). Thus black ink is used instead of the three CMY inks. See GCR and dot gain. Program. Under the direction of the Attorney General and with the cooperation and assistance of many local and state law enforcement agencies A law enforcement agency (LEA) is a term used to describe any agency which enforces the law. This may be a local or state police, federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). , the UCR Program created a hate crime data collection system to comply with the congressional mandate. The UCR Program's first publication on the subject was Hate Crime Statistics, 1990: A Resource Book, which was a compilation of hate crime data reported by 11 states that had collected them under state authority in 1990 and were willing to offer their data as a prototype. The UCR Program continued to work with agencies familiar with investigating hate crimes and collecting related information so that it could develop and implement a more uniform method of data collection on a nationwide scale. Hate Crime Statistics, 1992, presented the first data reported by law enforcement agencies across the country that participated in UCR hate crime data collection. Lawmakers amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include bias against persons with disabilities by passing the Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 in September of that year. The FBI started gathering data for the additional bias type on January 1, 1997. Finally, the Church Arson arson, at common law, the malicious and willful burning of the house of another. Originally, it was an offense against the security of habitation rather than against property rights. Prevention Act, which was signed into law in July 1996, removed the sunset clause from the original statute and mandated that hate crime data collection become a permanent part of the UCR Program. (Appendix I provides the referenced legislation as amended.) Collection Design The designers of the national hate crime data collection program sought to capture information about the types of bias that motivate crimes, the nature of the offenses, and some information about the victims and offenders. In creating the program, the designers recognized that hate crimes are not separate, distinct crimes; instead, they are traditional offenses motivated mo·ti·vate tr.v. mo·ti·vat·ed, mo·ti·vat·ing, mo·ti·vates To provide with an incentive; move to action; impel. mo by the offender's bias. (For example, an offender offender n. an accused defendant in a criminal case or one convicted of a crime. (See: defendant, accused) assaults a victim because he is biased against the victim's race.) After much consideration, the developers agreed that hate crime data could be derived by capturing the additional element of bias in those offenses already being reported to the UCR Program. Attaching the collection of hate crime statistics to the established UCR data collection procedures, they concluded, would fulfill ful·fill also ful·fil tr.v. ful·filled, ful·fill·ing, ful·fills also ful·fils 1. To bring into actuality; effect: fulfilled their promises. 2. the directives of the Hate Crime Statistics Act without placing an undue additional reporting burden on law enforcement and, in time, would develop a substantial body of data about the nature and frequency of bias crimes occurring throughout the Nation. Participation Law enforcement's support and participation have been the most vital factors in moving the hate crime data collection effort from concept to reality. The International Association of Chiefs of Police
The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) was founded in Chicago in 1893 as the National Chiefs of Police Union. , the National Sheriffs' Association The National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) is a U.S. non-profit trade association dedicated to raising the level of professionalism among U.S.sheriffs, their deputies and others in the fields of criminal justice and public safety. , the former UCR Data Providers Advisory Policy Board (which is now part of the Criminal Justice Information Services See Information Systems. Advisory Policy Board), the International Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standards and Training, and the Association of State UCR Programs all have endorsed the UCR Program's hate crime program. In addition to this support, thousands of law enforcement agencies nationwide make a crucial contribution to the national Program's success because it is the officers within these agencies who investigate offenses, determine whether a hate crime was committed, and report the offense as a known hate crime. In 2003, more than 17,000 city, county, and state law enforcement agencies reported crime data to the national UCR Program via Summary reporting or the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS NIBRS National Incident-Based Reporting System (US DoD) ). Of that total, 11,909 law enforcement agencies voluntarily submitted data to the hate crime program either through state UCR Programs or directly (agencies in non-Program states). (Appendix B of this publication provides a directory of state UCR Programs.) Those agencies that participated in the hate crime data collection program represented nearly 241 million inhabitants
The game is based loosely on the concepts from SameGame. , or 82.8 percent, of the Nation's population, and their jurisdictions covered 49 states and the District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States). . The table on the following page presents the number of agencies participating in UCR and hate crime reporting by population group and the population covered collectively by those agencies within each group.
Number of Participating Agencies and Population Covered by
Population Group, 2003
Agencies participating in
Uniform Crime Reporting
Number of
participating Population
Population group agencies covered
Total 17,381 290,809,777
Group I (Cities 250,000 and over) 71 53,436,860
Group II (Cities 100,000 - 249,999) 176 26,238,733
Group III (Cities 50,000 - 99,999) 431 29,641,812
Group IV (Cities 25,000 - 49,999) 823 28,480,363
Group V (Cities 10,000 - 24,999) 1,873 29,615,324
Group VI (1) (Cities under 10,000) 8,773 26,149,056
Metropolitan Counties (1) 2,161 66,965,001
Nonmetropolitan Counties (1) 3,070 30,282,628
Agencies participating in
UCR hate crime reporting
Number of
participating Population
Population group agencies covered
Total 11,909 240,906,049
Group I (Cities 250,000 and over) 67 50,552,281
Group II (Cities 100,000 - 249,999) 149 22,335,406
Group III (Cities 50,000 - 99,999) 367 25,402,789
Group IV (Cities 25,000 - 49,999) 676 23,485,936
Group V (Cities 10,000 - 24,999) 1,455 22,979,685
Group VI (1) (Cities under 10,000) 5,787 18,316,627
Metropolitan Counties (1) 1,353 55,800,063
Nonmetropolitan Counties (1) 2,055 22,033,262
(1) Includes universities and colleges, state police agencies,
and/or other agencies to which no population is attributed.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion