Internet, charity lotteries? Not yet in Canada, courts rule.CHARLOTTETOWN -- "The internet age presents new challenges to the enforcement of gaming laws" PEI Chief Justice GE. Marshall wrote in a decision barring a licence to the Earth Future Lottery. The Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1] upheld the PEI courts without comment. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the judgement the gaming provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada The Criminal Code of Canada (long title An Act respecting the criminal law, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, as amended) is the codification of most of the criminal offences and procedure in Canada. does not permit charity lotteries on the internet to operate in Canada. Among the reasons given were: * A province may license gaming to operate within a province. An internet lottery is illegal because its purpose is to market throughout Canada and the world. * A lottery manager must be able to control and limit sales e.g., to persons over 18 years of age, which an internet lottery does not permit. * An internet lottery would have been equivalent to a slot machine or video gaming video gaming n. 1. Gambling by means of interactive games of chance played on a video screen. 2. The playing of video games. device. The Earth Fund and Lottery Management (P.E.I.), is owned by the Earth Fund, Toronto, and headed by former UN Under Secretary General Maurice Strong Maurice F. Strong, (his first name is pronounced "Morris"), PC, CC, OM (born April 29, 1929, in Oak Lake, Manitoba) is an industrialist and public servant who was the Secretary-General of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), better known as the . It was tentatively approved for a license by the PEI government. However, the government referred questions about the legality of an internet lottery to the provincial courts. The office for the lottery was to be located in Montague, PEI where it might have employed 20 persons. However, The Earth Fund had contracted with Amsterdam-based Novamedia, which develops, maintains and operates gaming systems for charities in the Netherlands, other parts of Europe, and Uzbekistan. Novamedia communications director Mildred Hofkes told Community Action that the company "believes the decision is a loss not only for the province but especially for the environment. The lottery was supposed to create more than 20 full-time jobs in Montague and pump between $6$9 million into provincially operated environmental groups." Tickets would have sold for US$50 each. Novamedia, according to its website, would receive 50% of the funds raised. The company reports that it has handled more than 2.6B [euro] (C$41B) in gaming transactions since 2000. The Earth Future Fund planned to distribute the funds to environmental protection organizations and to Medicins sans frontieres, all with offices in Canada. The licence was opposed by provincial lottery and gaming corporations in all but the Atlantic provinces Atlantic Provinces, term used since 1949 to designate the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island. . The Earth Fund's application for charitable registration had been turned down three years earlier by the Minister of Revenue because "the lottery operation is a business that is its only activity." "There's nothing in the Criminal Code relating to relating to relate prep → concernant relating to relate prep → bezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc Internet lotteries," Provincial Treasurer In Canadian politics the Provincial Treasurer is a senior protfolio in the Executive Council (or cabinet) of provincial governments. The position is the provincial equivalent of the Minister of Finance and is responsible for setting the provincial budget. Pat Mella said. "Its absence more than anything else hasn't given the Supreme Court anything to interpret, it's just not there. Obviously, the Criminal Code was written at a time when we didn't have the Internet." To read the judgement go to website. communication.ca |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion