Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,111,409 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

International Trade Commission Issues Order Dismissing Investigation Against Macronix, Sonnenschein Announces.


Business Editors

WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 14, 2001

Lawyers at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal won a major patent litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 victory on behalf of Macronix International Co., Ltd. and Macronix America, Inc. ("Macronix") when the International Trade Commission (ITC ITC (Brit) n abbr (= Independent Television Commission) → Fernseh-Aufsichtsgremium

ITC n abbr (BRIT) (= Independent Television Commission) →
) issued an order finding that Macronix's semiconductor products do not infringe in·fringe  
v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v.tr.
1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.

2.
 the "Silicon Signature" patent of computer chip manufacturer Atmel Corporation. Part of ongoing litigation between domestic producer Atmel Corporation and foreign semiconductor makers, the ITC's order of June 1, 2001, dismissed the investigation against Macronix, finding that it committed no import violations under section 337 of the Tariff Act. An exclusion order remains in place against the other respondents prohibiting imports of their products into the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. .

The ITC's order concludes a major chapter in a patent litigation battle that began 4 1/2 years ago when Atmel accused Macronix and three other companies of importing semiconductor chips that allegedly infringed Atmel's patented chip technology. An Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge n. a professional hearing officer who works for the government to preside over hearings and appeals involving governmental agencies. They are generally experienced in the particular subject matter of the agency involved or of several agencies.  (ALJ ALJ Administrative Law Judge
ALJ Association for Legal Justice (Northern Ireland) 
) originally held in 1998 that Macronix did not infringe Atmel's patent and that the patent was invalid. On review, the ITC held that Atmel's patent was invalid because it failed to name one of the patent's inventors. Atmel then "corrected" its patent in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by adding an alleged co-inventor, and persuaded the ITC to reopen the case.

In 1999 the ITC remanded the reopened case to the ALJ. Following a four-day trial in early 2000, the ALJ found that Atmel's patent was invalid because Atmel added the wrong inventor and intentionally deceived the Patent Office on this matter. On review, the ITC reversed the ALJ's ruling, finding that Macronix's three co-respondents violated section 337 of the Tariff Act. The ITC also entered an exclusion order against those co-respondents, barring the import of their semiconductors containing the Silicon Signature technology into the United States. On separate grounds, though, the ITC found that Macronix did not infringe.

In an extraordinarily expedited appeal in early 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the exclusion order against the co-respondents while also reversing the Commission's non-infringement ruling for Macronix. The Federal Circuit then remanded Macronix to the Commission for further findings regarding whether it infringed the patent, based upon a revised patent claim construction.

The ITC now has terminated the investigation, stating in its order that Macronix did not infringe Atmel's patent under the Federal Circuit's interpretation of the patent claims and that Macronix, therefore, has committed no import violations.

Kirk Ruthenberg, a partner in Sonnenschein's Washington, D.C. office, served as lead trial counsel in the Macronix case. He is part of Sonnenschein's Intellectual Property & Technology Group, which numbers more than 70 lawyers, nearly half of whom are registered patent lawyers with technical expertise in electrical and computer engineering, telecommunications, software, chemical, biotech bi·o·tech  
n. Informal
Biotechnology.


biotech
Noun

short for biotechnology

Noun 1.
 and other life sciences, and mechanical engineering.

To view a PDF file See PDF.  of the Notice of Ruling regarding Macronix that appeared in the June 7, 2001 Federal Register, visit www.sonnenschein.com (Investigation No. 337-TA-395) In the Matter of Certain Eprom, Eprom, Flash Memory, and Flash Microcontroller A single chip that contains the processor (the CPU), non-volatile memory for the program (ROM or flash), volatile memory for input and output (RAM), a clock and an I/O control unit.  Semiconductor Devices, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Final Determination of no Violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as to Macronix Respondents on Remand To send back.

A higher court may remand a case to a lower court so that the lower court will take a certain action ordered by the higher court. A prisoner who is remanded into custody is sent back to prison subsequent to a Preliminary Hearing before a tribunal or magistrate
 From the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Sonnenschein is a pioneer in the expansion of the worldwide Internet and a leader in applying new technology to the practice of law. With 500 attorneys in eight U.S. cities and a global reach throughout Europe, Asia and Latin America Latin America, the Spanish-speaking, Portuguese-speaking, and French-speaking countries (except Canada) of North America, South America, Central America, and the West Indies. , the law firm also serves the unique and diverse needs of businesses in understanding and adapting to emerging technologies that help their enterprises prosper and grow.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:9TAIW
Date:Jun 14, 2001
Words:622
Previous Article:AremisSoft Discontinues Plans For Its Strategic Investment in GlobalSoft; AremisSoft Board To Meet Tomorrow to Consider Substantial Increase in Share...
Next Article:Yankee Candle Elects Former General Electric Investment Corp. Chairman Dale Frey to Board of Directors.
Topics:



Related Articles
MACRONIX JOINS SANDISK, ALLIANCE, QUICKLOGIC AS WAFER PARTNER IN TOWER'S FAB 2 PROJECT.
CANDIDATES CLASH AS RACE HITS STRETCH PROBE OF MAILING SOUGHT.
POLICE COMMISSION SETTING UP NEW RULES FOR LAPD COMPLAINTS.
NASDAQ REFORM CRITICS WARN OF RULES' IMPACT.
Actor agrees to leave production.
BRIEFCASE INTEL, BROADCOM FIX PATENT DISPUTE.
Judge may not demand that pleading exceed federal rule's standard.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles