Printer Friendly

Internal control weaknesses in April highlight leases.

In its ongoing review of internal control disclosures, Compliance Week (May 10, 2005 edition) noted that in April, 58 companies disclosed material weaknesses in their internal control over financial reporting. The number was down significantly from the 116 that were disclosed in March; however, the publication opines, the decrease was "largely due to the high volume of companies filing their annual reports in March."

For year-over-year comparison, only 30 companies made similar disclosures in April 2004, which was prior to the effective date of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404.

As the chart below indicates, the largest number of disclosure weaknesses--22.6 percent--cited lease accounting. By way of comparison, in the previous month (March), leases and loans accounted for less than 10 percent of disclosures.

The lease-related disclosures, Compliance Week noted, "were being made in wake of a letter written by the Securities and Exchange Commission's chief accountant to a professional accounting group. The letter, written itself after a wave of restatements to correct lease-related accounting errors, reiterated the rules."

Also significant 10.75 percent of the disclosures noted staff issues. This is a growing problem (see accounting education article on page 40).
Most Common Internal Control Disclosures in April 2005

Type Percentage

Lease Accounting 22.58%
Accounting Policies, Practices 18.28%
Staff (Inexperienced, Lack of) 10.75%
Taxes 8.60%
GAAP Calculations, Policies 7.53%
Revenue Recognition 5.38%
Account Reconciliation 4.30%
Segregation of Duties 3.23%
IT Environment 3.23%
Financial Close Process 2.15%
Inventory Issues 2.15%
Control Environment 2.15%
Documentation 2.15%
Monitoring 2.15%
Anti-Fraud Controls 1.08%
SAS 70 Issues 1.08%
Timing (Not Enough Time) 1.08%
Uncategorized 1.08%

These numbers are based on 93 material weaknesses disclosed in April
2005; some companies disclosed more than one weakness.
Source: Compliance Week, May 10, 2005 (reprinted with permission).
COPYRIGHT 2005 Financial Executives International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:domesticNEWS
Author:Heffes, Ellen M.
Publication:Financial Executive
Article Type:Illustration
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2005
Words:305
Previous Article:SEC to publicly release comment letters, responses.
Next Article:U.S. FPIs urged not to slack off 404 implementation.
Topics:


Related Articles
Section 404 compliance in the annual report: assessing control deficiencies now is a documented process required of management.
Practical experiment: as the first phase of a new campus, KPMB attempt to resolve the site's awkward geometry and topography.
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: remediation, communication, education; Financial Executives Research Foundation (FERF) asked three audit firms for...
Section 404 compliance: telling it like it is; It's 'showtime' for reporting on internal controls, and Financial Executives Research Foundation...
More guidance for audits of internal controls.
Executives praise SOX but seek changes; it's not quite a backlash, but after the first full year of reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, many...
How to implement a 'Lean Strategy': it's more than simply a goal to be achieved.
The 5% rule and materiality.
Are regulations changing management reports? A recent Financial Executives Research Foundation (FERF) survey reviews year-one disclosure practices...
Section 404 for small caps: ease the learning curve for small-cap companies.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters