Intake and admissions.
25. Intake and Admissions
U.S. District Court Bozeman v. Orum, 199 F.Supp.2d 1216 (M.D.Ala.
2002). The representative of the estate of a
SCREENING pretrial detainee brought a [section] 1983 action
against a sheriff and officials at a county
MEDICAL SCREENING detention facility, alleging that the detainee's
death was the result constitutional violations.
The district court held that detention officers'
use of force to restrain the detainee did not
violate his Fourteenth Amendment right against
the use of excessive force, even though the
officers threatened to "kick" the detainee's
"ass." The officers apparently punched or slapped
the detainee, and the detainee died as the result
of the officers' actions, but the court found
that some level of force was necessary to restore
order where the detainee was apparently
undergoing a mental breakdown in his cell. The
court held that nurses at the detention facility
were not deliberately indifferent to the serious
medical needs of the detainee when they failed to
obtain treatment and medication upon learning
that the detainee had been evaluated for mental
health problems and prescribed medication in the
past. The court noted that the nurses had no
knowledge during intake beyond a "slight flag" of
past evaluations for mental illness and that the
detainee had medication to help him "rest." The
court also found that the failure of the
detention facility to implement a policy
requiring staff to follow up on inmates who had
acknowledged past mental health problems or
evaluations for mental health problems, did not
violate the detainee's Fourteenth Amendment right
to adequate medical care. The court held that
municipal jails are not required to provide
on-site psychiatric care for their inmates, and
that the detention facility was not required to
train its officers in diagnosing or treating
mental illness. (Montgomery County Detention
Facility, Alabama)
U.S. Appeals Court Gibson v. County of Washoe, Nev., 290 F.3d 1175
(9th Cir. 2002). The widow of a manic depressive
MEDICAL SCREENING detainee who suffered a heart attack and died
while in a county jail, sued the county, sheriff
and various officials under [section] 1983. The
district court entered summary judgment for the
defendants and the widow appealed. The appeals
court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and
remanded. The appeals court held that several
fact issues precluded summary judgment: whether
the county's policy of delaying medical screening
of combative inmates posed a substantial risk of
serious harm to the detainee; whether the county
was aware of that risk; whether the nurse who
received the detainee's medication at the jail
was deliberately indifferent; and whether the
county was liable based upon its policy regarding
handling of prescription medication. The appeals
court found that deputies who had contact with
the detainee after he was admitted to the jail,
and who took part in the forcible restraint that
preceded his death, were not deliberately
indifferent to his medical needs because they
knew nothing of his mental condition beyond what
they could observe. (Washoe County Jail, Nevada)
U.S. District Court Turner v. Kight, 192 F.Supp.2d 391 (D.Md. 2002).
A female detainee who was arrested on an
MEDICATION outstanding warrant associated with a civil
matter and detained at a jail brought an action
MEDICAL SCREENING against county and state officials. The district
court granted summary judgment for the
defendants. The court held that arresting and
booking officers were deliberately indifferent to
the detainee's serious medical needs when they
allegedly removed a neck brace and seized
medication, ignoring her complaints of pain and
muscle spasm. The detainee sometimes limped and
walked with a cane, but the court found that the
detainee's alleged pain did not rise to the level
of a serious medical need. The court granted
qualified immunity to the officers, finding that
there was no indication that the officers
actually knew of, and ignored, a serious need for
medical care. The court also found that the
officers were not deliberately indifferent by
failing to dispense medication in response to the
detainee's complaints of pain, where the officers
were not permitted to dispense medication and
they notified the detention facility's medical
staff of a nonemergency situation, who did not
respond during the six hours the detainee was
confined. (Montgomery County Detention Center,
Maryland)
COPYRIGHT 2002 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion