Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,587,697 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Institute calls for fewer limits on S corporations. (Highlights).


A bill pending in the House of Representatives would modernize the laws that govern subchapter S Subchapter S

IRS regulation that gives a corporation with 35 or fewer shareholders the option of being taxed as a partnership to escape corporate income taxes.
 of the Internal Revenue Code The Internal Revenue Code is the body of law that codifies all federal tax laws, including income, estate, gift, excise, alcohol, tobacco, and employment taxes. These laws constitute title 26 of the U.S. Code (26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. , Robert A. Zarzar, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000.  and chairman of the AICPA AICPA

See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
 tax executive committee, told the House Ways and Means WAYS AND MEANS. In legislative assemblies there is usually appointed a committee whose duties are to inquire into, and propose to the house, the ways and means to be adopted to raise funds for the use of the government. This body is called the committee of ways and means.  subcommittee on select revenue measures in June. The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 and other laws passed in recent years have facilitated entrepreneurs' access to S corporations, he said, but more liberal reform is necessary to broaden and ease entry into these entities, which offer a limited number of investors--currently not more than 75--protection from corporate creditors, the ability to deduct business losses on shareholders' individual tax returns and freedom from double taxation.

Zarzar told subcommittee members that while the Institute had some minor reservations about a few provisions in the bill, the AICPA generally supported HR 1896, the Subchapter S Modernization Act of 2003, which addresses many, but not all, of the improvements needed. Still, the AICPA recommends certain changes in the bill, including

* Recognizing and removing anticompetitive an·ti·com·pet·i·tive  
adj.
That discourages competition among businesses: anticompetitive foreign trade restrictions. 
 limitations on the growth of existing S corporations. The Institute strongly supports section 205 of the pending bill allowing a stock basis increase for appreciated property an S corporation contributes to charity. Currently, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  requires an S corporation shareholder to reduce his or her stock basis by the amount of any charitable contribution deduction charitable contribution deduction

An itemized income-tax deduction for donations of assets to Internal Revenue Service-designated organizations. Certain qualifications on this deduction apply, such as a contribution limit of 50% of a taxpayer's adjusted
 flowing from an S corporation to the shareholder. So if an S corporation claims a fair-market-value deduction for a contribution of appreciated property, the shareholder must reduce his or her basis in the S corporation by that amount. But for partnerships, the IRS requires a partner's basis in his or her partnership interest be reduced by his or her pro rata [Latin, Proportionately.] A phrase that describes a division made according to a certain rate, percentage, or share.

In a Bankruptcy case, when the debtor is insolvent, creditors generally agree to accept a pro rata share of what is owed to them.
 share of the partnership's basis in the property contributed. The AICPA believes partnerships and S corporations should be treated similarly in this context, and this provision would preserve the intended benefit of a fair-market-value deduction for the contributed appreciated property without recognizing the appreciation when the stock is later sold. Section 205 would encourage charitable giving and protect taxpayers who don't realize gifting appreciated property through an S corporation results in recognition of the gain inherent in the property when the S corporation stock eventually is disposed of in a taxable transaction.

* Clarifying or correcting existing S-corporation-related laws. The pending bill eliminates a major concern regarding the use of electing small business trusts (ESBTs) for succession planning in family-owned S corporations by disregarding unexercised powers of appointment in determining the trust's eligibility as an S corporation shareholder. However, because ESBTs are taxed at the highest marginal rate (that is, 35%) and thus are minimally susceptible to abuse, the Institute believes the bill should go further and eliminate most other eligibility restrictions on ESBTs.
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:459
Previous Article:Winning mistakes. (Golden Business Ideas).
Next Article:AcSEC EDs focus on investment entity financial reporting. (Highlights).



Related Articles
Subchapter S reform at hand?
"B" rating for BC welfare reforms from the Fraser Institute. (Children & Families).
Tenth Circuit blocks attempt to narrow Rehabilitation Act in disability cases.
Corporations target obesity, saying it costs $12 billion annually.(Brief Article)
UV-based system optimizes water disinfection.
Science education: the future begins today!(Announcements / NIEHS Extramural Update)
Explaining gender gap.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor)
Living long on less? Mouse and human cells respond to slim diets.(This Week)
Call for new policy on boys of color.(NEWS)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles