Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,482,883 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Innate cravings and lactose digestion. (Letters From Our Readers).


Bravo on your latest issue. It's about time animal rights and environmental issues were debated. However, I disagree with Lester Brown. He says the fact that people start to eat meat as soon as they can afford to proves that "the taste for meat is probably an innate appetite." As soon as people can afford it, they build large houses and buy expensive cars. Is there an innate appetite for these?

There is "an innate appetite" for goods that suggest status, and meat more often than not suggests status. There may have been a reason in the hunter-gatherer (or gatherer-hunter) stage of human evolution to eat meat, but we know very little about this stage and the diets of that time period. We do know, however, that they were nomads who burned their meat. Today, meat burns us. Our "innate appetite for meat" is now as anachronistic as our "innate appetite for violence." We can't afford either.
Roberta Kalechofsky
Marblehead, MA


While I commend you for the excellent coverage on the implications of meat, egg and dairy consumption, I found your discussion of the rates of lactose
1. A disaccharide in milk that hydrolyzes to yield glucose and galactose. Also called milk sugar.
2. A white crystalline substance obtained from whey and used in infant foods and in pharmaceuticals as a diluent and excipient. Also called milk sugar.
 intolerance misleading. In "Body Of Evidence," Sally Deneen writes, "Three out of 10 adults are lactose intolerant." While this is true if the focus is only North America, we need to look at the bigger picture. In fact, the majority of the world's people, approximately seven out of 10, are unable to digest the sugar in cow's milk.

It is inappropriate to discuss lactose intolerance based on a western, predominantly Caucasian standard because it imposes on Asians, Africans and Aboriginals a diet that contributes to disease that these groups have been protected from for most of their existence. When they immigrate to North America and adopt our lifestyle, they begin to suffer from the rates of heart disease, cancer and stroke that have become our norm. We would benefit from omitting dairy products even though most North Americans can consume them.
Michael Manchester
Aylmer, ON, Canada
COPYRIGHT 2002 Earth Action Network, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:E
Date:May 1, 2002
Words:333
Previous Article:The free-range compromise. (Letters From Our Readers).
Next Article:Blood type brouhaha. (Letters From Our Readers).(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
Yogurt: bacteria to basics. (yogurt may help prevent or treat certain health problems)
Explore the growth response of bifidobacteria.
Harness lactose using enzymatic conversion.
Grow up! (Chart-Reading Skills/Vocabulary Builder).(analysis of mother's milk)(Teacher's Edition)
ZOO'S BAMBOO SHORTAGE TAKES TOLL ON PANDAS.(News)
NEWS LITE\Falk's award no mystery.(NEWS)
Dairy-Free and Delicious.(Book Review)
Battling for integrity. (NCEW vs. Planted Opinions).(National Conference of Editorial Writers)
East meets west at the dinner table: an introduction to Chinese food therapy.(strong roots)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles