Injections seldom cause HIV infection.Evidence indicates that sexual transmission--not unsafe injections--is the main way HIV HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), either of two closely related retroviruses that invade T-helper lymphocytes and are responsible for AIDS. There are two types of HIV: HIV-1 and HIV-2. HIV-1 is responsible for the vast majority of AIDS in the United States. spreads in sub-Saharan Africa, an international team has concluded. In an article published in the February 2004 issue of The Lancet, the Lancet, The British medical journal established in 1823, published weekly from New York and London. Its founder and first editor, Thomas Wakley, considered at the time a radical reformer, stated that the intent of the new journal was to report on hospital lectures and team reviewed and refuted assertions that unsafe injections given for medical reasons are a major mode of HIV transmission in the region. First, team members concluded that unsafe injections are not frequent enough to play a dominant role in such transmission. Transmission efficiency of HIV through injection in African health care settings is also far less than the 2.3 percent previously asserted, they estimated. This is, in part, because injections are usually intramuscular intramuscular /in·tra·mus·cu·lar/ (-mus´ku-ler) within the muscular substance. in·tra·mus·cu·lar adj. Abbr. IM Within a muscle. (rather than intravenous) and needles are likely to be cleaned before reuse. Also, the team found that the asserted strong association between a history of injections and HIV infection did not adequately account for reverse causality. (Since HIV-infected individuals are more likely to be sick than are uninfected ones, they may be more likely to have received injections for treatment.) The asserted association also did not sufficiently account for confounding confounding when the effects of two, or more, processes on results cannot be separated, the results are said to be confounded, a cause of bias in disease studies. confounding factor factors, particularly a history of sexually transmitted infections. The authors of the article also point out that there is no evidence that children receive fewer injections than do adolescents and adults, yet HIV infection (apart from mother-to-child transmission mother-to-child transmission Vertical transmission, see there ) is rare in children. Finally, the authors cite the HIV epidemic in South Africa South Africa, Afrikaans Suid-Afrika, officially Republic of South Africa, republic (2005 est. pop. 44,344,000), 471,442 sq mi (1,221,037 sq km), S Africa. , where unsafe injections are uncommon but HIV prevalence is very high: 26.5 percent in antenatal an·te·na·tal adj. See prenatal. antenatal before parturition. Called also prenatal, antepartal. care clinics in 2002. On the other hand, substantial data indicate that unsafe sexual behaviors are the cause of the epidemic there. In conclusion, the team found "no compelling evidence that unsafe injections are a dominant mode of HIV-1 transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Conversely, though there is a clear need to eliminate all unsafe injections, epidemiological evidence indicates that sexual transmission continues to be by far the major mode of spread of HIV-1 in the region." |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion