Printer Friendly

Increased mitochondrial DNA cop number in occupations associated with low-dose benzene exposure.

BACKGROUND: Benzene is an established leukemogen at high exposure levels. Although low-level benzene exposure is widespread and may induce oxidative damage, no mechanistic biomarkers are available to detect biological dysfunction at low doses.

OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to determine in a large multicenter cross-sectional study whether low-level benzene is associated with increased blood mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn, a biological oxidative response to mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction) and to explore potential links between mtDNAcn and leukemia-related epigenetic markers.

METHODS: We measured blood relative mtDNAcn by real-time polymerase chain reaction in 341 individuals selected from various occupational groups with low-level benzene exposures (> 100 times lower than the Occupational Safety and Health Administration/European Union standards) and 178 referents from three Italian cities (Genoa, Milan, Cagliari).

RESULTS: In each city, benzene-exposed participants showed higher mtDNAcn than referents: mtDNAcn was 0.90 relative units in Genoa bus drivers and 0.75 in referents ([rho] = 0.019); 090 in Milan gas station attendants, 1.10 in police officers, and 0.75 in referents ([rho] -trend = 0.008); 1.63 in Cagliari petrochemical plant workers, 1.25 in referents close to the plant, and 0.90 in referents farther from the plant ([rho] -trend = 0.046). Using covariate-adjusted regression models, we estimated that an interquartIle range increase in personal airborne benzene was associated with percent increases in mtDNAcn equal to 10.5% in Genoa ([rho] = 0.014), 8.2% ([rho] = 0.008) in Milan, 7.5% in Cagliari ([rho] =0.22), and 10.3% in all cities combined ([rho] <-0.001), Using methylation data available for the Milan participants, we found that mtDNAcn was associated with LINE-1 hypomethylation (-2.4l%; [rho]=0.007) and [rho]15 hypermethylation (+15.95%, [rho] =0.008).

CONCLUSIONS: Blood MtDNAcn was increased in persons exposed to low benzene levels, potentially reflecting mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction.

KEY WORDS: benzene, biomarkers, low exposures, methylation, mitochondrial DNA copy number. Environ Health Perspect 120:210-215 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103979 [Online 17 October 2011]

Benzene is a widespread environmental chemical associated with increased risk of hematological malignancies, particularly with acute nonlymphocyric (myeloid) leukemia [Baan et al. 2009; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 1982, 1987]. Benzene ranks among the top 20 chemicals for production volume in the United States [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2006]. Outdoor air contains low levels of benzene from several sources, including gas stations, motor vehicle exhaust, and industrial emissions [Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) 2011]. Most of the current epidemiologic evidence for benzene-related leukemia risk sterns from studies among workers exposed to very high levels of benzene (Smith 2010). Multiple investigations have suggested potential hematotoxicity at levels below the occupational exposure limit of 1 ppm (equivalent to 1,000 ppb or 3,250 [micro]g/[m.sup.3], 8-hr time-weighted average) recommended by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and European Union (EU 1997; Forastiere et al. 1994; Lan et al. 2004; OSHA 2003). Nonetheless, uncertainties remain about the effects of benzene at low levels. In particular, as remarked in a recent review of benzene health effects (Smith 2010), epidemiology and animal studies have not yet provided conclusive insights about the shape of the exposure-response relationship, particularly at low doses [less than or equal to] 1 ppm in air. In this context, the development and use of mechanism-based biological markers has been suggested to hold substantial value in the risk-assessment process (Albertini et al. 2003; Smith 2010).

An important limitation in the current understanding of benzene carcinogenesis is that mechanisms activated at low doses are still largely undefined (Atkinson 2009). In vitro models have shown that some of the reactive metabolites of benzene, such as phenol, catechol, and hydroquinone, can bind to and damage macromolecules, including DNA (Ross 2000. These reactive metabolites may also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can exacerbate DNA damage (Palackal et al. 2002). Recently, Bollati et al. (2007) showed that low-dose exposure to airborne benzene is associated with alterations in DNA methylation in blood DNA of healthy individuals and that the alterations resemble those found in hematological malignancies including hypomethylation of LINE-1 and Alu repetitive elements, hypermethylation of the [rho] 15 tumor suppressor gene. and hypomethylation of melanoma-associated antigen 1 gene (MAGEA1). Global DNA hypomethylation has been consistently demonstrated in recent in vitro experiments on hydroquinone-treated human lymphoblastoid cells (Ji et al. 2010). These effects of benzene on DNA methylation have been suggested to result from ROS-induced DNA damage (Baccarelli and Bollati 2009).

Mitochondria are both the major intracellular source and primary target of ROS, which are generated under normal conditions as by-products of aerobic metabolism in animal and human cells (Han et al 2001). Each human and animal cell contains between several hundred and > 1,000 mitochondria, each carrying 2-10 copies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (Cavelier et al. 2000). MtDNA copy number (mtDNAcn) is positively correlated with the number and size of mitochondria (Lee and Wei 2000). Compared with nuclear DNA, mtDNA has diminished protective histones and DNA repair capacity and is therefore particularly susceptible to ROS-induced damage. Cells challenged with ROS have been shown to synthesize more copies of their mtDNA and to increase their mitochondrial abundance to compensate for damage and meet the increased respiratory demand required for ROS clearance (Lee and Wei 2000). Conversely, ROS are also generated from the increased mitochondria and can, in turn, cause additional oxidative damage to mitochondria and other intracellular constituents, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids.

In a recent study of 40 Chinese shoe and clothing manufacturing workers (Shen et al. 2008), individuals exposed to benzene levels > 1 ppm exhibited higher mtDNAcn in peripheral blood leukocytes than subjects with lower exposure. MtDNAcn has never been studied in larger studies, particularly at the levels of exposure often found in populations in North America and Europe. In the present work, we conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study in Italian cities on individuals exposed to low-level benzene from a variety of sources to examine whether low doses of benzene exposure cause alterations in mtDNAcn.

Methods

Study population. We enrolled 519 participants from three Italian cities (Genoa, Milan, Cagliari). In each city, we included individuals with low-level benzene exposures along with referents. Exposed subjects were selected from occupational categories that entail exposure to low levels of benzene (Fustinoni et al. 2005; Merlo et al. 2003), including 153 bus drivers in Genoa; 78 gas station attendants and 77 police officers in Milan; and 33 workers in a modern petrochemical plant in Cagliari. In Genoa and Milan, referents were occupationally active people from the same area as the exposed participants. In Cagliari, we selected referents who were residents of two small towns located at 2 and 5 km from the petrochemical plant (close referents). An additional sample of referents (distant referents) was selected from an area farther ([greater than or equal to 20 km) from the plant. Both exposed and referent individuals had been actively employed for [greater than or equal to] 1 year. We used the same standardized procedures for recruiting all exposed and unexposed individuals in all cities. The smaller numbers of referents compared with exposed workers was determined based on the balance between the efforts required to motivate and recruit referents versus loss in statistical power. A standardized, structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information on lifestyle and risk factors. All participants provided written informed consent to the study, which was approved by the local institutional review boards.

Personal exposure assessment. Personal exposure to airborne benzene was determined using passive samplers worn by the study participants near the breathing zone during their work shifts for 5-6 hr (approximately 0800-0930 hours to 1300-1430 hours). In Milan and Genoa, we used passive samplers (stainless-steel tube, 9-mm internal diameter, 90-mm length) containing Chromosorb 106 [R] (Celite Corp., Lompoc, CA, USA) and equipped with a diffusion chamber (Brown 1999). At the end of the monitoring period, the passive sampler was closed with a brass cap and nut, equipped with a polyperfluoroethylene ferule, and kept at-20[degrees]C until analysis, performed by thermal desorption followed by gas chromatography/ flame ionization detector analysis (Fustinoni et al. 2005). In Cagliari, we used Radiello [R] passive samplers, equipped with a 35-to 50-mesh charcoal cartridge (Supelco, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) At the end of sampling the cartridge was sealed in glass tubes and kept in a clean box at room temperature until gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis (Fustinoni et al. 2010a), which occurred within 30 days from collection, as per manufacturer's instructions. The two sampling methods have been shown previously to have similar recovery performances (Hayes 2009). All benzene analyses were performed at the Environmental Chemistry Unit of the National Cancer Research Institute (Genoa, Italy). The detection limit for airborne benzene was 6[micro]g/[m.sup.3] (1.85 ppb). Sixty-five individuals (12.5%) had benzene levels below the detection limit (DL) and were assigned a value corresponding to DLN/[square root of( term)]2 (Hornung and Reed 1990).

mtDNAcn analysis. Total DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) from whole blood collected in EDTA tubes at the beginning of the work shift. Relative mtDNAcn was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as described previously (Hou et al. 2010). All samples were run in triplicates in 384-well plates on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The assay is based on the ratio of copy number estimates of a mitochondrial gene (mtNDl) to those of a nuclear gene [human beta globin (hbg]. The mtNDl/hbg ratio thus calculated in experimental samples is then scaled to a standard DNA sample to obtain relative mtDNAcn values controlled for plate effects. The standard DNA sample was obtained by pooling DNA from 20 participants randomly selected from the Milan referents and was used to generate a fresh five-point standard curve (range: 20-0.247 ng) in every mtNDl and hbg run. Primers and conditions for mtDNAcn analysis are provided in the Supplemental Material (http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103979).

In addition to the mtDNAcn data, DNA methylation measures on blood DNA by PCR-pyrosequencing were available for the subset of Milan participants as part of previous work evaluating the effects of benzene exposure on DNA methylation (Bollati et al. 2007).

Statistical analysis. We used standard descriptive statistics [means, SDs, medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and proportions] to summarize data. MtDNAcn showed asymmetric distributions within each city and exposure group and was log-transformed to approximate normality. Throughout this paper, we report geometric means (GMs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences in mtDNAcn across exposure groups were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and tests for trend computed via linear regression analysis. In addition, we evaluated the association between mtDNAcn and exposure groups by fitting multivariate models adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male, female), smoking (never, former, current smoker), and number of cigarettes/day (continuous). We used linear regression models to examine the association of airborne benzene levels with mtDNAcn. Scatterplots of airborne benzene versus mtDNAcn showed a nonlinear relationship that approximated linearity when both variables were log-transformed. All models were thus fitted by regressing Iog[mtDNAcn] over log[benzene]. To exclude confounding by factors associated with differences across cities (including potential differences from the different protocol used for air benzene sampling in Cagliari), we first fitted unadjusted and adjusted models for each of the cities separately, and then we fitted models for all participants combined. In the models of all participants combined, we fitted an independent indicator variable for each of the cities (Genoa, Milan, Cagliari) in both unadjusted and adjusted models. In both city-specific and combined analyses, adjusted models included age, sex, smoking, and number of cigarettes/day as independent variables. To facilitate understanding of effect sizes, effects are expressed throughout this paper as percent variation in mtDNAcn per IQR increase in benzene exposure. To confirm the results from multiple linear regression models evaluating the association between relative mtDNAcn and airborne benzene, we performed a set of sensitivity analyses [for details, see Supplemental Material (http://dx.doi.org/10.128/ehp.1103979)].

In the subset of the study participants with DNA methylation data (n=212), we fitted multiple regression models (adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and number of cigarettes/day) to evaluate the association of log[mtDNAcn] with LINE-1, Alu, [rho]l5, or MAGEA1 DNA methylation. DNA methylation variables were also log-transformed to approximate normality; effects are expressed as percent variation in DNA methylation per IQR change in mtDNAcn.

Outliers were excluded from all regression analyses by dropping observations with studentized residuals that exceeded [+ or -] 3. Using these criteria, a variable number of observations (between one and seven) was dropped from each model. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided.

Statistical analyses were performed using Stata/MP 11.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA), R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study population. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study population by city and exposure group. The overall median age was 39 years of age considering all participants, with median values ranging from a minimum of 30 years of age (Milan police officers) to a maximum of 55 years of age (Cagliari distant referents). In all cities combined, males represented 81% of the study population. The proportion of overall current smokers (32%) was similar to the proportion of smokers in the Italian male adult population [Istituto nazionale di statistica (ISTAT) 2009]. The mean number of cigarettes/day was 16 for all participants combined. Most of the study participants (66%) resided in the suburbs at the time of enrollment.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.

 Sex Smoking

City Exposure n Age Male Female Never Former
 group (b)


Genoa Referents 49 42(9) 47(96) 2(4) 25(51) 11(22)
 Bus drivers 153 38(23) 150(98) 3(2) 61(40) 45(29)

Milan Referents 57 36(18) 38(67) 19(33) 26(46) 8(14)
 Police 77 30(8) 47(61) 30(39) 40(52) 9(12)
 officers
 Gas station 78 41(18) 69(88) 9(12) 30(38) 16(21)
 attendants

Cagliari Distant 16 55(15) 10(62) 6(38) 8(50) 6(38)
 referents
 Close 56 46(17) 27(48) 29(52) 31(55) 15(27)
 referents
 Petrochemical 33 36(21) 32(97) 1(3) 10(30) 10(30)
 workers

All 519 39(16) 420(81) 99(19) 231(45) 120(23)
subjects

 Cigaretts Home address (a)

City Current per day (c) City Suburbs
Genoa 13(27) 16 [+ or -] 7 23(47) 26(53)
 47(31) 17 [+ or -] 9 50(33) 103(67)
Milan 23(40) 15 [+ or -] 10 19(33) 38(67)
 28(36) 15 [+ or -] 7 10(13) 65(87)
 32(41) 17 [+ or -] 8 27(35) 51(65)
Cagliari 2(12) 13 [+ or -] 4 9(56) 7(44)
 10(18) 16 [+ or -] 6 21(38) 35(62)
 13(40) 15 [+ or -] 9 16(48) 17(52)
All 168(32) 16 [+ or -] 8 175(34) 342(66)
subjects

Values are n (%) unless noted otherwise.

(a) The counts do not add up to the total number of
participants because of two missing valuse. (b) Median
(IQR). (c) Mean [+or-]SD; number of cigarettes/day
calculated among current smokers only


Exposure levels to airborne benzene. Across all cities, airborne benzene exposure levels as measured on personal samplers were higher for individuals in the exposed groups than the referents (Table 2). Among the occupationally exposed participants, the highest exposure levels were observed in the Milan gas station attendants [GM = 69.9 [micro]g/[m.sup.3]; 95% CI: 57.4, 85.2 (21.5 ppb; 95% CI: 17.7, 26.2)], followed by the Cagliari petrochemical workers [GM = 35.4[micro]g/[m.sup.3] 95% CI: 20.5, 61.0 (10.9 ppb; 95% CI: 6.31, 18.8)]. GMs across different referent groups were all between 5.9 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] (1.82 ppb, Cagliari distant referents) and 8.7 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] (2.68 ppb, Genoa referents).
Table 2. Airborne benzene by city and exposure group.

 Benzene exposure levels ([mu]g/[m.sup.3]) (a)

City Referents Minimum 25th Median 75th
 percentile percentile

Genoa Bus drivers 4.2 4.2 8.6 13.8
 Referents 4.2 14.8 20.5 30.9

Milan Police 4.2 4.2 6.3 12.8
 officers
 Gas station 9.03 19.0 21.8 31.1
 attendants
 Distant 11.5 37.9 60.9 130.9
 refrents

Cagliari Close 4.2 4.2 6.0 7.0
 referents
 Petrochemical 4.2 5.1 8.0 11.0
 workers
 Petrochemical 6.0 11.0 25.0 63.0
 workers

City Maximum GM (95% CI) [rho]-Value

Genoa 45.8 8.7(7.3,
 10.5)
 92.1 20.5(18.7, < 0.001
 22.4) (b)

Milan 57.1 8.1(6.6,
 10.0)

 315.7 25.0(22.0,
 28.3)

 477.9 69.9(57.4, < 0.001
 85.2) (c)

Cagliari 9.0 5.9(4.9,
 7.1)

 27.0 8.2(7.1,
 9.4)

 1250.0 35.4(20.5, < 0.001
 61.0) (c)

(a) To convert micrograms per cubic meter to parts per billion,
divide by 3.25. (b) Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test for
difference between referents and bus drivers. (c) Nonparametric
test (Cuzick) for trend across exposure categories.


Relative mtDNAcn by exposure groups. In each city, exposed participants had consistently higher mtDNAcn levels than referents (Table 3). In Genoa, mean relative mtDNAcn was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.85) in referents and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) in bus drivers ([rho]-=0.019) in analysis adjusted for age, sex smoking, and number of cigarettes/day. In Milan, adjusted mean relative mtDNAcn was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.82) in referents, 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.19) in police officers, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.98) in gas station attendants ([rho]-trend=0.008). In Cagliari, adjusted mean relative mtDNAcn was 0.90 (95% CI:0.60, 1.41) in distant referents, 1.25 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.51) in close referents, and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.18) in petrochemical workers ([rho]-trend=0.046). Referents exhibited different mtDNAcn across cities, with higher mean levels in Cagliari compared with Milan and Genoa (Table 3).
Table 3. Relative mtDNAcn by city and exposure group.

 MtDNAcn (unadjusted)

City Exposure group n Mean (95% CI) [rho]-Value
 (a) (b)

Genoa Referents 48 0.75(0.65,
 0.86)
 Bus drivers 151 0.90(0.84, 0.013
 0.97)

Milan Referents 56 0.76(0.68,
 0.84)
 Police 77 1.14(1.07, <-0.001
 officers 1.22)
 Gas station 76 0.86(0.79, 0.037
 attendants 0.94)

Cagliari Distant 10 0.94(0.59,
 referents 1.48)
 Close 47 1.24(1.01, 0.215
 referents 1.52)
 Petrochemical 24 1.64(1.30, 0.024
 workers 2.07)

City [rho]-Trend Mean (95% [rho]-Value [rho]-Trend
 (c) CI) (d) (b) (c)

Genoa 0.75(0.66,
 0.85)
 -- 0.90(0.84, 0.019 --
 0.97)

Milan 0.75(0.69,
 0.82)
 1.10(1.01, <-0.001
 1.19)
 0.180 0.90(0.83, 0.005 0.008
 0.98)

Cagliari 0.90(0.60,
 1.41)
 1.25(1.03, 0.206
 1.51)
 0.020 1.63(1.22, 0.041 0.046
 2.18)

(a) GM and 95% CI. (b) One-way ANOVA for difference versus
referents. (c) Linear regression analysis for test for trend
across exposure categories. (d) GM an 95% CI adjusted for age,
sex, smoking (never former, current), number of cigarettes/day.


Relative mtDNAcn and airborne benzene, Relative mtDNAcn showed a positive correlation with airborne benzene concentrations in each of the cities (figure 1A-C). In multivariate regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking and number of cigarettes/day we found a significant 10.5% increase (95% CI: 2.1, 19.6; p = 0.0 14) iii relative mtDNAcn per IQR benzene increase in Genoa (Figure 1 A) and a significant 8.2% increase (95% Cl: 2.2, 14.7; p = 0.008) in Milan (Figure 1 B). In Cagliari, the correlation between relative mtDNAcn and airborne benzene was also positive (7.5% increase; 95% Cl: -4.2, 20.6) (Figure 1C), hut riot statistically significant (p = 0.22). City-specific unadjusted analyses showed similar results, except for Milan, where the percent increase was lower than in the multivariate analyses (10.7% increase; 95% CI: 2.4, l9.7p 0.011 in Genoa; 3.3% increase; 95% CI: -2.7, 9.7; p = 0.29 in Milan; 9.0% increase; 95% CI: -1.6, 20.8; p = 0.10 in Cagliari). Analyses on all participants combined (Figure 1 D) showed a highly significant increase in relative rntDNAcn associated with henzene levels for both unadjusted (7.8% increase; 95% CI: 2.9, l3.O;p = 0.002) and adjusted regressions (10.3% increase; 95% CI: 5.4, l5.5; p < 0.001).

DNA methylation and relative mtDNAcn. Taking advantage of extant epigenetic data in the Milan subset of the study population (n = 212), we also explored whether mtDNAcn was associated with DNA methylation in LINE-1, Alu, [rho]15, and MAGEA1 by multivariate regression models (adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and number of cigarettes! day). Correlations of mtDNAcn with DNA methylation measures are shown in Figure 2A-D. LINE-1 methylarion showed a significant decrease associated with an IQR increase in relative mtDNAcn (-2.4% change; 95% CI: -4.1, -0.7; [rho] = 0.007) (Figure 2A); [rho]15 methylation exhibited a significant percent increase (16.0% change; 95% Cl: 4.1, 29.2; [rho] = 0.008) (Figure 2C); Alu and MAGEA1 methylation (Figure 2B,D) did not show significant variations correlated with increasing relative mtDNAcn (-0.4% change; 95% CI: -2.5, 1.7; [rho] = 0.69 for Alu; 0.2% change; 95% CI: -0.1, O.6; [rho] = 0.14 for MAGEA1). Unadjusted analyses showed very similar results -2.3% change; 95% CI: -3.9, -0.7; [rho] = 0.005 for LINE-1; 13.0% change; 95% CI: 2.3, 24.8; [rho] = 0.017 for [rho]15; 0.4% change; 95% CI: -1.5, 2.4;[rho]= 0.69 for Alu; 0.3% change; 95% CI; -0.1, O.6; [rho] = 0.06 for MAGEA1).

Discussion

In this multicity investigation of individuals with low-level exposure to benzene, we found that blood mtDNAcn was increased in association with airborne benzene exposure. We observed differences in mtDNA levels by comparing different exposure groups within each city. We demonstrated a dose-response relationship between mtDNAcn and benzene exposure levels within each city and overall using personal sampler data as direct measures of individual benzene exposure. In the Milan study participants, increasing mtDNAcn COrrelated with decreased LINE-1 methylation and increased [rho]l5 methylation.

Benzene exposure has been linked consistently with hematological malignancies (Baan et al. 2009; IARC 1982, 1987) in cohorts of workers occupationally exposed to levels substantially higher than those found in the environment or even in modern facilities where appropriate occupational safety procedures are implemented. In our study population, benzene exposure levels (median 19.2[micro]/[m.sup.3], equivalent to 6 ppb) were more than 100 times lower, on average, than the occupational standard limit of 1 ppm (equivalent to 100O ppb or 3,250 [micro]/[m.sup.3],) set by OSHA/EU (EU 1997; OSHA 2003). Even in the most-exposed participant, henzene exposure level (1,250[micro]/[m.sup.3], 380 ppb) was still about one third of the occupational exposure limit.

MtDNAcn has been associated with benzene exposure in Chinese workers exposed to levels of benzene (14.3 [+ or -] 20.4 ppm, reported mean [+ or -] SD) comparable with those associated with hematological malignancies (Shen et al. 2008). Our study indicates that mtDNAcn alterations can he observed also at low exposure doses, possibly reflecting the activation of key cellular processes such as oxidative stress, which is known to operate in early carcinogenesis. Increased mtDNAcn has been suggested to have a dual role in cells challenged by oxidative stress. On one hand, it stimulates mitochondrial proliferation to supply energy to meet the need for cell survival, including damage repair and synthesizing new proteins (Lee and Wei 2000). On the other hand, the increasing abundance of dysfunctional mitochondria causes excess ROS production and further oxidative damage that may initiate cell senescence or death (Lee and Wei 2005). Baccarelli and Bollati (2009) demon s trated that alterations in DNA methylation can also result from oxidarive insults. Aberrant DNA methvlation, including hypomethylation of repetitive elements and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, is increasingly recognized as a critical step in malignant transformation (Rodriguez-Paredes and Esteller 2011). In particular, LINE-1 hypomethylation and p15 hypermethylation are commonly found in acute nonlymphocvtic leukemia and other hematological malignancies (Deneherg et al. 2010). Using methylation data available to us from a previous investigation (Bollati et al. 2007) of the Milan study participants, we found a linear association of mtDNAcn with both LINE-1hypomethylation and p15 hypermethylarion, whereas no association was observed between mtDNAcn and Alu or MAGEA1 methylation. Hypomethylarion of LINE-1, which has often been used as a surrogate for global methylation, is believed to contribute to determining chromosomal instability and breakage. The tumor suppressor gene pl5 shows low or no methylation in normal cells, whereas it is hypermethylated in acute nonlymphocyric leukemia cells (Claus and Lubbert 2003) as well as in other hematological malignancies (Gaim et al. 2006). pl5 encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, which functions as a cell growth regulator controlling cell cycle GI progression (Hannon and Beach 1994). Additionally, p15 hypermethylarion is widely considered to contribute to the loss of cell cycle arrest responses in malignant cells (Herman et al. 1996; Ng et al. 1997). Our findings on LINE-1 inethylation follow the same direction as a recent investigation of the Normative Aging Study cohort (Baccarelli et al. 2009) that showed an association between exposure to air pollution from traffic particles and DNA methylation of LINE-I, but flO association with Alu methylation. Even though LINE-1 and Alu repetitive element methylation has been demonstrated to correlate with global DNA methylation in cancer tissues (Weisenberger et al. 2005), the two repetitive elements are controlled through different mechanisms and might respond differently to oxidative stress (Bollati et aI. 2009). We did not observe any association between mtDNAcn and MAGEA1 methylation. We surmise that MAGEA1 may be part of a benzene-induced pathway that does not directly involve oxidative stress. Moreover, in our previous work on effects of benzene exposure on DNA methylation (Bollati er al. 2007), we found only a weak, borderline significant association between benzene exposure and MAGEA1 methylation.

Whether mtDNAcn has a direct role in carcinogenesis is still under investigation. Recent longitudinal studies have shown that individuals with higher blood mtDNAcn at baseline have higher risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer (Hosgood et al. 2010; Lan et al. 2008). In addition, mtDNAcn alterations are associated with impaired apoptosis and subsequent increased cellular proliferation (Eliseev et al. 2003) as well as with nuclear DNA mutations after mtDNA insertion into the genorne (Hazkani-Covo et al. 2010). Although these results are suggestive of potential roles of mtDNAcn in carcinogenesis, whether mtDNAcn alterations contribute to determining increased risks of malignancies in benzene-exposed individuals remains to be determined.

We note that at least some of our findings might be explained by exposure to co-pollutants whose levels may track together with airborne benzene levels. In all the cities in the present study, exposed individuals had higher mtDNAcn levels than referents. However, police officers in Milan who had exposure levels that were intermediate between gas station attendants and referents showed higher mtDNAcn levels than the gas station attendants. Conversely, Milan gas station attendants, who were the exposure group with the highest exposure across cities, were the group with the lowest mtDNAcn among exposed subjects. Although police officers and gas station attendants are both exposed to environmental benzene, these occupational categories work in different exposure settings. Gas station attendants are exposed mainly to benzene vapors during filling operations, whereas police officers receive most of their exposure from vehicular combustion by-products (Cattaneo et al. 2010). Combustion by-products from traffic include not only benzene but also particulate matter and nitric oxide, all of which can contribute to generating oxidative stress (Risorn et al. 2005). Because particulate matter and nitric oxide exposures were not measured in our study, we cannot determine their possible contributions to the increased mtDNAcn among the Milan police officers. Levels of mtDNAcn in the referent group in Cagliari were higher than those found in the Milan and Genoa referents. Cagliari is located on Sardinia. whose inhabitants mostly have a unique genetic background that goes back approximately 8,000 years to the island's original settlers (NIA 2009; Pilia et al. 2006). Consequently, Sardinians have genetic characteristics that are remarkably different from individuals living in other Italian regions (Gala et al. 2008). Using a twin study design, Xing et at (2008) demonstrated that mtDNA content is a trait with high genetic heritability. Based on these observations, the higher mtDNAcn values in the Cagliari participants might be determined by the different genetic background of the study individuals.

We used the same standardized study procedures across the three cities, including uniform questionnaires, data and blood collection, and mtDNAcn analysis. Air benzene sampling was performed using Chromosorb 106[R] stainless steel passive samplers (Celite Corp.) in Milan and Genoa, and Radiello passive samplers (Supelco) in Cagliari. A head- to-head comparison of the two different passive samplers showed no difference in recovery performances (Hayes 2009). The populations of the three cities in our study likely differ for multiple factors, including but not limited to lifestyle, diet, and climatic conditions. To take into account these differences and avoid potential confounding, we first analyzed each city' separately. Analyses on all participants combined were then conducted by fitting regression models that included an independent indicator variable for each of the cities.

Our study has the advantage of relying on personal measurements of benzene exposure obtained from portable passive samplers. Although limited to 1 day of airborne benzene sampling, airborne benzene measures showed significant differences between the exposure groups and were therefore used as a proxy for the usual exposure of the study participants in this cross-sectional study. In a new recruitment campaign, we recently reevaluated a subset of 53 Milan study participants (18 referents and 35 gas station attendants) from the original study and found high correlations of benzene concentration between the original study and current follow-up (Fustinoni et al. 2010b). Exposure levels in the exposed groups were comparable with those reported in previous studies on individuals in similar occupations (Angelini et al. 2011; Cattaneo et al. 2010; Lovreglio et al. 2010; Ruchirawat et al. 2010). We used a relative measure of mtDNAcn, which has been shown to be highly precise and reproducible (Xing et al. 2008). This method, which has been widely used in large human studies (Shen et al. 2010; Xing et al. 2008), expresses mtDNAcn as a relative measure in relation to standard DNA. Although this method is well suited for comparisons between groups that are usually all scaled to the same standard DNA, as in our study, the use of different standard DNA samples in different studies may limit external comparability.

Conclusions

Our investigation of individuals with low-level exposure to benzene

in three Italian cities showed increased mtDNAcn in association with airborne benzene exposure. 'Whether mitochondrial damage and dysfunction potentially related with increased mtDNAcn reflects the risk of hematological malignancies due to low-dose benzene remains to be determined in future prospective investigations.

REFERENCES

Albertini R, Clewell H, Himmelstein MW, Morinello E, Olin S, Preston J, et al. 2003. The use of non-tumor data in cancer risk assessment: reflections on butadiene, vinyl chloride, and benzene. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 31(1):105-132.

Angelini S, Kumar R, Bermejo JL, Maflei F, Barbieri A, Graziosi F, et al. 2011. Exposure to low environmental levels of benzene: evaluation of micronijcleus frequencies and S-phenyl-mercapturic acid excretion in relation to polymorphisms in genes encoding metabolic enzymes. Mutat Res 719(1-2):7-13.

Atkinson TJ. 2009. A review of the role of benzene metabolites and mechanisms in malignant transformation: summative evidence for a lack of research in nonmyalogenous cancer types. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212(1):1-10.

AISDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2011. ToxFAQs[TM] for Benzene. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs.tf.asp?id=38 & tid=14 [accessed 4 August 2011].

Baan R, Grosse Y, Strait K, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al. 2009. A review of human carcinoqens--Part F: chemical agents and related occupations. Lancet Oncol 10(12):1143-1144.

Baccarelli A, Bollati V. 2009. Epigenetics and environmental chemicals. Curr Opin Pediatr 21(2):243-251,

Baccarelli A, Wright RO, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Litonjua AA, Suh HH, et al. 2009. Rapid DNA methylation changes alter exposure to traffic particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179(7):572-578.

Bollativ V, Baccarelli A, Hou L, Bonzini M, Fustinoni S. Cavallo D, et al. 2007. Changes in DNA methylation patterns in subjects exposed to low-dose benzene. Cancer Res 67(3):876-880.

Bollati V, Schwartz J, Wright R, Litonjua A, Tarantini L, Suh H, et al. 2009. Decline in genomic DNA methylation through aging in a cohort of elderly subjects. Mech Ageing Dev 130(4):234-239

Brown RH. 1999. Environmental use of diffusive samplers: evaluation of reliable diffusive uptake rates for benzene, toluene and xylene. J Environ Monit 1(1):115-116.

Cala CM, Melis A, Vona G, Piras IS. 2008. Sardinian population (Italy): a genetic review. IntJ Mod Anthrop (1):1-121.

Cattaneo A, Taronna M, Consonni D, Angius S, Costamagna P, Cavallo DM. 2010. Personal exposure of traffic police officers to particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and benzene in the city of Milan, Italy. J Occup Environ Hyg 7(6):342-351.

Cavelier L, Johannisson A, Gyllensten U. 2000. Analysis of mtDNA copy number and composition of single mitochondrial particles using flow cytometry and PCR. Exp Cell Res 259(1 ):79-85.

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2006. Facts About Benzene. Available: http://www.bu.cdc.gov.agent.benzene/basics/facts. [accessed 4 August 2011].

Claus R, Lubbert M. 2003. Epigenetic targets in hematopoietic malignancies. Oncogene 22(42):6489-6496.

Deneberg S, Grovdal M, Karimi M, Jansson M, Nahi H, Corbacioglu A, et aL 2010. Gene-specific and global methylation patterns predict outcome in patients with acute myeloid Leukemia. Leukemia 24(5):932-94.

Eliseev RA, Gunter KK, Gunter TE. 2003. Bcl-2 prevents abnormal mitochondrial proliferation during etoposide-induced apaptosis. Exp Cell Res 289(2):275-281.

EU (European Union). 1997. Council Directive 97/42/EC of 27 June 1997 amending for the first time Directive 90/394/ EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/ EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 179, 08/07/1997 pp. 0004-0006,

Forastiere F, Perucci CA, Di Pietro A, Miceli M, Rapiti E, Bargagli A, et al. 1994. Mortality among urban policemen in Rome. Am J md Med 26(6): 785-798.

Fustinoni S, Ccrnsonni L, Campo, Buratti M, Calombi A, Pesatori AC, et al. 2005. Monitoring low benzene exposure: comparative evaluation of urinary biomarkers, influence of cigarette smoking, and genetic polymorphisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey 14(9):2237-2244.

Fustinoni S. Rossella F, Campo L, Mercadante R, Bertazzi PA. 2010a. Urinary BTEX, MTBE and naphthalerie as biomarkers to gain environmentaJ exposure profiies of the eneraI population. Sci Total Environ 408(14):2840-2849.

Fustinoni S, Rossella F, Polledri E, Campo L Pesatori AC, Bollati V, et al. 2010b. DNA global methylation in gasoline station attendants and controls. In: Proceedings from the 8th International Symposium on Biological Monitoring in Occupational and Environmental Health, 6-8 September 2010, Hanasaari, Espoo, Finland Vol 1 (Lampo A, Paakkonen T, Borg S, eds). Tampere. Finland: PK-paino Ov. 130.

Gaim O Herman JO, Baylin SB. 2006. The fundamental role of epigenetics in hematopoletic malignancies. Blood Rev 20(1 ):1-13.

Han D,Williams E, Cadenas E. 2001. Mitochondrial respiratory chain-dependent generation of superoxide anion and its release into the intermembrane space. Biochem J 353(Pt2): 41 1-416

Hannon GJ, Beach D. 1994. [p15.sup.INK4B] is a potential effector of TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest. Nature 371(6494):257-261.

Hayes HC. 2009. Long-term Monitoring Strategies for Indoor Air Measurements: Air Toxics Ltd., 180 Blue Ravine Rd. Suite B, Folsom, CA 95630. Available: http://secure.awma.org/presentations/VaporIntrusion09/Papers/6-Hayes.pdf [accessed 4 August 2011].

Hazkani-Covo F, Zeller RM, Martin W. 2010. Molecular poltergeists: mitochondrial DNA copies (numts) in sequenced nuclear genomes. PLoS Genet 6(2):e1000834; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1 000834 [Online 12 February 2010].

Herman JG, Jen J, Merlo A, Baylin SB. 1996. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for [p15.sup.INK4B]. Cancer Res 56(4):722-727.

Hornung RW, Reed LD. 1990. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of non-detectable values. Appi Occup Environ Hyg 5:48-51.

Hosgood HD III, Liu CS, Rothman N, Weinstein SJ, Bonner MR. Shen M, et al. 2010. Mitochondrial DNA copy number and lung cancer risk in a prospective cohort study. Carcinogenesis 31(5):847-849.

Hou L, Zhu ZZ, Zhang, (Nordia F, Bonzini M, Schwartz J, et al. 2010. Airborne particulate matter and mitochondrial damage: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 9:48; doi: 10.1 186/1476-069X-9-48 [Online 9 August 2010].

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1982. Some industrial chemicals and dyestutfs. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum 29:1-398.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1987. Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: an Updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 7:1-440.

ISTAT (Istituto nazionale di statistica). 2009. Regional Data-set on Health--Health and Risk Factors: Life Styles. Available: http://en.istat.it/sanita/sociosan/ [accessed 4 August 2011].

Ji Z, Zhang L, Peng V. Ren X, McHale CM, Smith MT. 2010. A comparison of the cytogenetic alterations and global DNA hypomethylation induced by the benzene metabolite, hydroquinone, with those induced by melphalan and etoposide. Leukemia 24(5):986-991.

Lan Q, Lim U, Liu CS, Weinstein SJ, Chanoek S, Bonner MR, et al. 2008. A prospective study of mitochondrial DNA copy number and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 112(10):4247-4249.

Lan Q, Zhang L, Li G, Vermeulen R, Weinberg RS, Dosemeci M, et al. 2004. Hematotoxicity in workers exposed to low levels of benzene. Science 306(5702):1774-1776.

Lee HC, Wei VH. 2000, Mitochondrial role in life and death of the cell. J Biomed Sci 7(1):2-15.

Lee HC, Wei YH. 2005. Mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA maintenance of mammalian cells under oxidative stress. lnt J Biochem Cell Biol 37(4):822-34.

Lovreglio P, Barbieri A, Carrieri M, Sabatini L, Fracasso ME, Doria D, et al. 2010. Validity of new biomarkers of internal dose for use in the biological monitoring of occupational and environmental exposure to low concentrations of benzene and toluene. mt Arch Occup Environ Health 83(3):341-356.

Merlo F, Bertazzi PA, Bolognesi C, Colombi A, Fustinoni S, Buratti M, et al. 2003. [European multicenter cross-sectional study on exposure to low doses of benzene]. G Ital Med Lay Ergon 25(3):296-297.

Ng MH, Chung YF, Lo KW, Wickham NW, Lee JC, Huang DP. 1997. Frequent hypermethylation of p16 and p15 genes in multiple myeloma. Blood 89(7):2500-2506.

NIA (National Institute on Aging) 2009. The SardiNlA Project. Available: http://sardinia.nia.nih.gov/ [accessed 4 August 2011].

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2003. Chemical Sampling Intormation--Benzene. Available: http://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_220100.html [accessed 3 August 2011].

Palackal NT, Lee SH, Harvey RG, Blair IA, Penning TM. 2002. Activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon trans-dihydrodiol proximate carcinogens by human aldo-keto reductase (AKR1C) enzymes and their functional overexpression in human lung carcinoma (A549) cells. J Bid Chem 277(27):24799-24808.

Pilia G, Chen WM, Scuteri A, Orru M, Albai G, Dei M, et al. 2006. Heritability of cardiovascular and personality traits in 6,148 Sardinians. PLoS Genet 2(8):e132, doi:10.1371/journal. pgen.0020132 [Online 25 August 2006].

Risom L, Moller P. Loft S. 2005. Oxidative stress.induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution. Mutat Res 592(1-2):1 19-137.

Rodriguez-Paredes M, Esteller M. 2011. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med 17(3):330-339.

Ross D. 2000. The role of metabolism and specific metabolites in benzene-induced toxicity: evidence and issues. J Toxicol Environ Health A 61(5-6):357-372.

Ruchirawat M, Navaumrit P, Settachan D. 2010. Exposure to benzene in various susceptible populations: co-exposures to 1,3-butadiene and PAHs and implications for carcinogenic risk. Chem Biol Interact 184(1-2):67-76.

Shen J, Platek M, Mahasneh A, Ambrosone CB, Zhao H. 2010. Mitochondrial copy number and risk of breast cancer: a pilot study. Mitochondrion 10(1):62-68.

Shen M, Zhang L, Bonner MR. Liu CS, Li G, Vermeulen H, et al 2008. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number, blood cell counts, and occupational benzene exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen 49(6):453-457.

Smith MT. 2010. Advances in understanding benzene health effects and susceptibility. Annu Rev Public Health 31:133-148.

Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, Kim M, Woods C, Fiala E, et al. 2005. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res 33(21):6823-6836.

Xing J, Chen M, Wood CG, Lin J, Spitz MR, Ma J, et at. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA content: its genetic heritability and association with renal cell carcinoma. J Nati Cancer Inst 100(15):1104-1112.

Address correspondence to M. Carugno. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Milan1 via San Barnaba 8, 20122, Milan. Italy. Telephone: 39 0250320119. Fax: 39 0250320103. E-mail: miche1e.carugno@gmail.com

Supplemental Material is available online (http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103979).

Thanks to A. Gililo-Tos for her critical comments, and F. Nordio for assistance with multiple imputation and spline models.

This work is part of M. Carugno's dissertation project for the Epidemiology Master Program, University of Turin, Italy. This work was supported by the Italian Association for Research against Cancer (AIRC-6016); INAIL Delib-277-05/06/2008; CARIPLO Foundation (2007-5469); National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P3OES000002); MIUR-PRIN (2003065 175/2003); and European Commission (BMH4-CT98-3785 and 1C20-CT98-0201).

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Received 24 May 2011; accepted 17 October 2011.

Michele Carugno, (1) Angela Cecilia Pesatori, (1), (2) Larua Dioni, (1) Hoxha, Mirjam, (1) Valentina Bollati, (1) Benedetta Albetti, (1) Hyang-Min Byun, (3) Matteo Bonzini, (4) Silvia Fustinoni, (2) Pierluigi Cocco, (5) Giannina Satta, (5) Mariagrazia Zucca, (5) Domenico Franco Merlo, (6) Massimo Cipolla, (6) Pier Alberto Bertazzi, (1), (2) and Andrea Baccarelli, (3)

(1.) Department of Occupational and Environmental Healt, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy;(2.) Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; (3.) Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (4.) Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; (5.) Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; (6.) Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials and Environmental Chemistr Units, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, National Cancer Reserch Institute, Genoa, Italy
COPYRIGHT 2012 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research
Author:Carugno, Michele; Pesatori, Angela Cecilia; Dioni, Laura; Hoxha, Mirjam; Bollati, Valentina; Albetti
Publication:Environmental Health Perspectives
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EUIT
Date:Feb 1, 2012
Words:7244
Previous Article:Reduction in cadmium exposure in the United States population, 1988-2008: the contribution of declining smoking rates.
Next Article:A method to estimate the chronic health impact of air pollutants in U.S. residences.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2015 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters