Printer Friendly

In defense of Dilbert. (Letters).

I read Gregory F. Augustine Pierce's article ("Don't be a Dilbert," September) with some interest, since I not only am a fan of Scott Adams' strip, but have been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. Pierce is probably right that the people in the Dilbert strip would find things equally bad at any employer. But the reason is not, as he proposes, a lack of spirituality--it's the nature of engineering and engineering management in this country. If something doesn't work, management tells the engineers to "make it work," without bothering to ask whether or not it can work!

It is regrettable that Pierce didn't check first with some engineers before writing an article that was intended to be serious, but which came out well-intentioned but uninformed.
H. Jon Thomas
San Jose, Calif.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Claretian Publications
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Thomas, H. Jon
Publication:U.S. Catholic
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Nov 1, 2002
Words:133
Previous Article:What's your gripe? (Letters).
Next Article:A teaching moment. (Letters).


Related Articles
The Dilbert Principle: A Cubicle's-Eye View of Bosses, Meetings, Management Fads and Other Workplace Afflictions.
Clever as Serpents: Business Ethics and Office Politics.
`DILBERT' REELING IN BOOK SALES.
NEWS LITE : NEW COMPUTER HAS HAWKING EXPANDING ON LINE.
DILBERT TO GET A VOICE IN TV COMMERCIALS.
Syndicated cartoonists ratchet up their online presence with free newsletters.
Letters. We like letters.
Letters. We like letters.
Letters. We like letters.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters