Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants.

Forty percent of hazardous waste sites in the United States are co-contaminated with organic and metal pollutants. Data from both aerobic and anaerobic systems demonstrate that biodegradation of the organic component can be reduced by metal toxicity. Metal bioavailability, determined primarily by medium composition/soil type and pH, governs the extent to which metals affect biodegradation. Failure to consider bioavailability rather than total metal likely accounts for much of the enormous variability among reports of inhibitory concentrations of metals. Metals appear to affect organic biodegradation through impacting both the physiology and ecology of organic degrading microorganisms. Recent approaches to increasing organic biodegradation in the presence of metals involve reduction of metal bioavailability and include the use of metal-resistant bacteria, treatment additives, and day minerals. The addition of divalent cations and adjustment of pH are additional strategies currently under investigation. Key words: bioavailability, biodegradation, bioremediation, hazardous waste, heavy metals, inhibition, metal toxicity, pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 111:1093-1101 (2003). doi:10.1289/ehp.5840 available via http://dx.doi.org/[Online 4 March 2003]

**********

Remediation of sites co-contaminated with organic and metal pollutants is a complex problem, as the two components often must be treated differently, yet 40% of the hazardous waste sites currently on the National Priority List of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) are co-contaminated (Sandrin et al. 2000). Metals most frequently found at U.S. EPA Superfund sites include arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc. Common organic co-contaminants include petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, and herbicides. Biodegradation to innocuous end products (C[O.sub.2], cell mass, water) is considered to be an environmentally sound and cost-effective process for removing organic contaminants (National Research Council 1994). In contrast, the nonbiodegradable metal component must either be removed or stabilized within the site. Removal involves a combination of steps that may include mobilization, separation and collection, off-site transport, and disposal. Stabilization of metals requires that the site be permanently changed in some way. Most drastic is vitrification, wherein contaminated soil is heated to form a glasslike substance (Staley 1995). Alternatively, the site may be capped or paved to prevent water from entering the site and transporting metal contaminants, or site conditions may be imposed (e.g., anaerobiosis) that reduce the potential for metal mobilization and transport (Liu et al. 2001; Zoumis et al. 2001). In either case, metal removal or metal stabilization, treatment of the organic component by biodegradation is likely to be the first step in remediation of co-contaminated sites (Roane et al. 1996).

It is well documented that the presence of metals can inhibit a broad range of microbial processes including methane metabolism, growth, nitrogen and sulfur conversions, dehalogenation, and reductive processes in general. An exhaustive review of the impacts of metals on many of these processes is available (Baath 1989). However, the effects of metal toxicity on organic pollutant biodegradation in contaminated water and soil environments have not been adequately defined quantitatively or qualitatively. This is because metals may be present in a variety of different physical and chemical forms, namely, as separate-phase solids, soil-adsorbed species, colloidal solutions, soluble complexed species, or ionic solutes. Related complications stem from the fact that the physical and chemical state of metals is affected by environmental conditions such as pH and ionic strength of the water phase as well as soil properties that include ion exchange capacity, clay type and content, and organic matter content.

In this review we discuss metal inhibition and toxicity in the context of the biodegradation of co-contaminant organic chemicals for which treatment is deemed necessary. Specifically, we address: a) the importance of the physical-chemical state of metals in relation to metal bioavailability and inhibition of microbial activity, b) the impact of metals on aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation processes, c) relationships between metal concentration and metal impacts on biodegradation, and d) how metal toxicity can be mitigated to allow effective biodegradation of targeted organic pollutants.

Metal Toxicity and Bioavailability

Metals exert their toxic effects on microorganisms through one or more mechanisms. An excellent review is available that describes modes of metal toxicity and the mechanisms by which microorganisms resist such toxicity (Nies 1999). Toxic metal cations may substitute for physiologically essential cations within an enzyme (e.g., [Cd.sup.2+] may substitute for [Zn.sup.2+]), rendering the enzyme nonfunctional. Similarly, metal oxyanions, such as arsenate, may be used in place of structurally similar, essential nonmetal oxyanions, such as phosphate. In addition, metals impose oxidative stress on microorganisms (Kachur et al. 1998).

Metal toxicity is most commonly ascribed to the tight binding of metal ions to sulfhydryl (-SH) groups of enzymes essential for microbial metabolism. In fact, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a given metal to Escherichia coli tends to be related directly to the dissociation constant of the metal sulfide (Nies 1999). Metals may inhibit pollutant biodegradation through interaction with enzymes directly involved in biodegradation (e.g., pollutant-specific oxygenases) or through interaction with enzymes involved in general metabolism. In either case, inhibition is mediated by the ionic form of the metal (Angle and Chaney 1989). The implication is that metal toxicity is related to the concentration of ionic species rather than to the total or even total soluble metal concentration (which may include metal-organic complexes that are not capable of binding to enzymes). It follows, then, that the metal concentration of interest is that which is capable of binding to enzymes and interfering with microbial activity. It is this metal concentration that we define here as bioavailable metal. Although the concept of bioavailable metal is important, measurement of bioavailable metal is difficult because it varies depending on the environment and the type of organism exposed. The solution-phase metal concentration is therefore often used to approximate bioavailable metal, as discussed in the following sections.

Effect of medium and soil components on metal bioavailability. In their review of metal speciation (i.e., the distribution of different forms, or species, of a given metal), bioavailability, and toxicity, Hughes and Poole (1991) stress the importance of understanding metal speciation in the test system. Unfortunately, few studies provide speciation information. As a result, an enormous range of metal concentrations has been reported to inhibit organic biodegradation (Tables 1 and 2). For instance, five orders of magnitude separate lowest reported concentrations of zinc that inhibit biodegradation.

The fact that not all of the studies cited in Tables 1 and 2 made exhaustive efforts to determine the lowest concentration of metal required to cause a reduction in biodegradation may explain, in part, the large differences observed. However, the large range of reported inhibitory concentrations is also due to differences in experimental protocols that affected solution-phase metal concentrations. For example, many laboratory media contain metal-binding (e.g., yeast extract) and metal-precipitating (e.g., phosphate or sulfate salts) components that can reduce solution-phase metal concentrations (Hughes and Poole 1991; Poulson et al. 1997). Medium pH also dramatically impacts solution-phase metal concentrations. As pH increases, metals tend to form insoluble metal oxides and phosphates, resulting in decreased solution-phase metal concentrations (Hahne and Kroontje 1973). Specifically, in media that contain phosphate, perhaps the most common buffer used in microbiology, even a small change in pH can decrease metal solubility, reducing solution-phase metal concentrations by several orders of magnitude. The effects of pH and phosphate concentration on the amount of cadmium in solution as predicted by a metal speciation modeling program (MINEQL+; Environmental Research Software, Hallowell, ME) are illustrated in Figure 1. At pH 7 the concentration of cadmium in solution is 88 mM in the absence of phosphate. As phosphate is increased to 0.13, 1.3, 13, and 130 mM, the solution-phase concentration of cadmium is reduced to 50, 17, 2, and 0.1 mM, respectively. In the studies summarized in Tables 1 and 2, pH varied from 5.0 to 8.2, and phosphate concentrations ranged from 0 to 50 mM. In addition, many studies used media rich in metal-binding components, whereas others did not. The variability of each of these factors hampers meaningful comparisons between studies and underscores the need for future studies to report solution-phase metal concentrations. In the soil environment, organic matter and clay mineral content are important factors that can reduce solution-phase metal concentrations. For example, only 0.01 mg solution-phase cadmium/L was required to inhibit trichloroaniline (TCA) dechlorination in a mineral-dominated soil, whereas 0.2 mg solution-phase cadmium/L was required for inhibition in an organic matter-dominated soil (Pardue et al. 1996). This increase in the amount of cadmium required to inhibit dechlorination was correlated to saturation of metal-binding sites on organic matter. Similarly, Said and Lewis (1991) reported that biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid methyl ester (2,4-DME) was much more sensitive to metal inhibition in aufwuchs (floating algal mats) than in sediments. The authors suggested that this was due to greater metal-binding capacity of sediments. Clay minerals have also been shown to reduce metal bioavailability. Clays with high cation exchange capacities (CECs), such as montmorillonite, appear to be most effective at reducing metal bioavailability and toxicity (Babich and Stotzky 1977a, 1977b, 1978). In fact, the large impact of clays on metal bioavailability has prompted investigation into the use of clays to reduce metal bioavailability and toxicity, as described later in this review.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

In addition to organic matter and clay minerals, metals may interact with organic pollutants to affect bioavailable concentrations of metals. Although a dearth of information is currently available on this topic, one study has shown that salicylate, a common intermediate in the biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, increased cadmium uptake and toxicity in E. coli (Rosner and Aumercier 1990). Additional research is needed to determine whether bioavailability and toxicity are affected similarly with other microorganisms, metals, and organic pollutants.

Several recent studies illustrate clearly the degree to which the composition and pH of media and soils affect metal concentrations. For example, only 1% of the total zinc added to acetate enrichment anaerobic cultures in the work of Majumdar et al. (1999) was in the aqueous phase. Similarly, Kong (1998) found that solution-phase metal concentrations in sediment slurries initially amended with 20 mg total metal/L were below detection limits of 0.03-0.04 mg/L. Amendments of 100 mg total metal/L yielded only 1 mg solution-phase cadmium/L and less than 0.12 mg solution-phase copper and chromium/L. Finally, Roberts et al. (1998) were unable to detect solution-phase lead (below 1 mg/L) in anaerobic soil-slurry bioreactors initially containing 10,000 mg total lead/kg.

Measurement of bioavailable metal. Reporting of bioavailable metal concentrations is a vital step in the process of standardizing experiments to determine the impact of metals on organic pollutant biodegradation. Bioavailable metal concentrations can be estimated from solution-phase metal concentrations using tools such as ion-selective electrodes and atomic absorption spectroscopy. There are also a number of promising tools in development that use biological systems to quantify solution-phase and even bioavailable metal concentrations. These have the advantage that they can be used in complex systems such as microbiological media and soil. The first such tool is the immunoassay, which can detect solution-phase metal concentrations in the low [micro]g/L range. Immunoassays have been developed for cadmium, lead, cobalt, nickel, and zinc. An immunoassay for mercury is commercially available (Blake et al. 1998; Khosraviani et al. 1998). The second tool is the use of bioreporters, which are whole cells that produce a protein with measurable activity (e.g., LacZ) or light in response to bioavailable metal. Bioreporters for detection of mercury have been created using both the lacZ system (Rouch et al. 1995) and the luminescent lux system (Corbisier et al. 1999; Selifonova et al. 1993). Although a bioreporter measures bioavailable metal, it should be emphasized that depending on the metal resistance mechanisms of the bioreporter system used, measurement of bioavailable metal can vary. A review of applications, advantages, and limitations of immunoassays and bioreporters for metal detection is available (Neilson and Maier 2001).

Alternatively, geochemical modeling software (e.g., MINTEQA2, MINEQL+) can be used to predict metal speciation as a function of pH and ionic strength (Pardue et al. 1996). At least three computational models have been developed to predict the impact of metals on organic biodegradation (Amor et al. 2001; Jin and Bhattacharya 1996; Nakamura and Sawada 2000). These models account for metal inhibition by adding metal inhibition constants (e.g.,/[K.sub.i]) to conventional growth and/or degradation equations. For instance, Amor et al. (2001) used a form of the Andrews equation (often used to describe microbial growth with inhibition) to model the effect of cadmium, zinc, and nickel on rates of alkylbenzene biodegradation

[1] [mu] = [[mu].sub.max] S / ([K.sub.s] + S + [S.sup.2] / [K.sub.i]),

where [mu] is the alkylbenzene biodegradation rate, [[mu].sub.max]is the maximum alkylbenzene biodegradation rate, S is the alkylbenzene concentration, [K.sub.s] is the alkylbenzene concentration that yields [[mu].sub.max], and [K.sub.i] is the metal inhibition constant.

None of these models currently incorporates metal speciation and bioavailability. The concern with the use of such models is that the data generated may only be meaningful for the medium or soil that was used to develop the model. For example, the medium used by Nakamura and Sawada (2000) was adjusted to a pH of 7.8 and contained 0.147 mM phosphate. Similarly, the medium used by Amor et al. (2001) was adjusted to a pH of 5.9 and contained 36 mM phosphate. In both media, much of the metal may precipitate. Thus, these models are likely to underpredict metal toxicity in systems that have a lower pH and/or less phosphate.

Metal Inhibition of Microbiological Processes

An extensive body of work is available on the effect of metals on general soil microbiological processes. The impact of metals on litter decomposition, methanogenesis, acidogenesis, nitrogen transformation, biomass generation, and enzymatic activity all have been studied (Babich and Stotzky 1985; Bardgett and Saggar 1994; Burkhardt et al. 1993; Capone et al. 1983; Doelman and Haanstra 1979a,b; Hickey et al. 1989; Knight et al. 1997; Kouzelikatsiri et al. 1988; Lin 1993; Masakazu and Itaya 1995; Mosey 1976; Nandan et al. 1990; Pankhania and Robinson 1984; Rogers and Li 1985). Metals including copper, zinc, cadmium, chromium (I[I and VI), nickel, mercury, and lead are reported to inhibit each of these processes. However, addition of metals has also been observed to stimulate activity in some cases. For example, some metals, including mercury, lead, nickel, cadmium, and copper, stimulate methanogenesis in anoxic salt sediments (Capone et al. 1983). In addition, nickel (< 300 mg/L) was reported to stimulate acidogenesis (Lin 1993).

Studies on the effect of metals on organic pollutant biodegradation are not extensive but demonstrate that metals have the potential to inhibit pollutant biodegradation under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. These studies are summarized in the sections that follow.

Aerobic biodegradation. Metals inhibit aerobic biodegradation of a variety of organic pollutants of concern (Table 1), including chlorinated phenols and benzoates (BENs), low molecular weight aromatics, and hydroxy-benzoates. Copper, cadmium, mercury, zinc, and chromium (III) inhibited biodegradation of 2,4-DME in lakewater samples inoculated with either a sediment or an aufwuch (floating algal mat) sample (Said and Lewis 1991). In the sediment samples, zinc was most toxic, with an MIC of 0.006 mg total zinc/L, whereas in samples of aufwuchs, mercury was most toxic, with an MIC of 0.002 mg total mercury/L. A pure culture study using a naphthalene (NAPH)-degrading Burkholderia sp. reported an MIC of 1 mg solution-phase cadmium/L (Sandrin et al. 2000). A comparable MIC was reported by Said and Lewis (1991) for cadmium (0.1 mg total cadmium/L for sediment samples and 0.629 mg total cadmium/L for aufwuch samples). The differences between these MICs are likely organism/community specific.

Springael et al. (1993) reported metal inhibition of pollutant biodegradation by several bacterial genera tested under pure culture conditions. In this case, the reported MICs were 2-4 orders of magnitude higher than those reported by Said and Lewis (1991) (Table 1). This large discrepancy is likely due to differences in test conditions. Agar media were used in this study, and it has been pointed out that colony growth may protect against metal toxicity and result in higher MICs.

Metal inhibition has also been observed in metal-contaminated soil systems. For example, cadmium added at levels of 60 mg total cadmium/kg was found to inhibit biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in a soil system inoculated with the 2,4-D-degrader Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134 (Roane et al. 2001; Roane and Pepper 1997). Experiments with an indigenous soil community (Maslin and Maier 2000) examined the impact of cadmium on phenanthrene (PHEN) biodegradation in two desert soils over a 9-day period. Results showed a 5-day increase in lag period for PHEN degradation in the presence of 1 and 2 mg solution-phase cadmium/L and complete inhibition at 3 mg solution-phase cadmium/L. Note that in this soil system, 3 mg solution-phase cadmium/L was equivalent to 394 mg total cadmium/kg added to the soil.

Studies investigating the impact of metal toxicity on biodegradation are not limited to aromatic contaminants. The impact of copper toxicity on biodegradation of a biodegradable polymer, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), has been investigated (Birch and Brandl 1996). This compound is commonly used for medical, agricultural, and industrial purposes. In agriculture, the material is used both as film mulch and as a long-term delivery device for fertilizers. In both cases the material is expected to biodegrade after use. However, treatment of agricultural fields with sewage sludges, which often have high copper concentrations, can increase the soil copper content. The impact of copper toxicity on PHB biodgradation was determined by placing a PHB-containing agar overlay on a copper-containing agar. The plate was incubated at a slant so that copper diffusion into the overlay created a concentration gradient along the length of the plate. The plates were then inoculated with a PHB-degrading strain of Acidovorax delafieldii. The bioavailable concentration of copper along the gradient was estimated by measuring copper in filter paper that contacted the gradient. Using this novel method, the authors found that 8-15 mg bioavailable copper/L were required to inhibit PHB biodegradation.

Not all studies have investigated the impact of single metals on biodegradation of only a single, pure organic. Benka-Coker and Ekundayo (1998) investigated the impact of zinc, lead, copper, and manganese on crude oil biodegradation by a Micrococcus sp. and a Pseudomonas sp. Biodegradation was reduced most by zinc (concentrations as low as 0.43 mg total zinc/L) and least by manganese (concentrations as low as 28.2 mg total manganese/L). Interestingly, combinations of metals were less toxic than some single metals. For instance, toxicity of 0.5 mg total zinc/L was mitigated by addition of 0.5 mg total copper, lead, and manganese/L.

Anaerobic biodegradation. Anaerobic metabolism is an important and sometimes the sole process for biodegradation of highly halogenated organics such as trichloroethene and perchloroethene (Alexander 1999). Often, these solvents have been co-disposed with metals. For this reason several recent studies have addressed the impact of metal toxicity on the anaerobic biodegradation of organic pollutants (Table 2). Despite that anaerobic conditions are thought to largely reduce the solubility and mobility of many toxic metals, data from studies summarized below suggest that metal inhibition of biodegradation is significant in many of these systems.

Representative of solution studies, Kuo and Genthner (1996) investigated the impact of cadmium, copper, chromium, and mercury on &chlorination and biodegradation by an anaerobic bacterial consortium isolated from an aquatic sediment. This consortium was capable of completely degrading 2-chlorophenol (2CP), 3-chlorobenzoate (3CB), phenol (PH), and BEN. In general, the addition of low levels of metals (0.1-2.0 mg total metal/L) lengthened acclimation periods and decreased dechlorination and biodegradation rates. Biodegradation of 3CB was inhibited most by cadmium and chromium, biodegradation of BEN was most sensitive to copper, and biodegradation of PH was reduced most by mercury. Similarly, cadmium has been shown to reduce the rate of anaerobic pentachlorophenol (PCP) biodegradation (Kamashwaran and Crawford 2001). Kuo and Genthner (1996) point out that their results suggest that, in addition to adversely affecting degraders in a consortium, metals may affect nondegrading consortium members that play a vital but indirect role in the degradation process. For instance, members of the consortium that produce reducing equivalents for reductive dehalogenation or remove dechlorinated products from the system to allow further dehalogenation may be inhibited, thus reducing the overall rate and extent of biodegradation.

Such an indirect mode of toxicity has also been implicated in metal inhibition of anaerobic biodegradation of trinitrotoluene (TNT) metabolites (Roberts et al. 1998). In this study, copper, zinc, and lead did not affect establishment of anaerobic conditions in bioreactors containing soil slurries nor did these metals impact loss of the parent TNT compound. However, the subsequent removal of TNT degradation intermediates was reduced by each of the metals. For example, lead (total concentrations > 1,000 mg/kg) delayed degradation of a TNT biodegradation intermediate (2,4-diamino-6-nitrotoluene [2,4-DANT]) by as many as 9 days. Zinc (1,500 mg total zinc/kg) delayed degradation of the same intermediate by eight days. Copper (4,000 and 8,000 mg total copper/kg) completely inhibited removal of this intermediate. Clearly, when considering the impact of metals on organic biodegradation, the effects of metals on populations other than degraders of the parent compound must also be considered.

A small number of studies have been conducted in anaerobic soil and sediment systems. Work in soil systems suggests that soil type influences metal toxicity. For example, Pardue et al. (1996) examined the impact of cadmium on reductive dehalogenation of TCA in different soils. In microcosms containing two mineral-dominated soils, only 0.01 mg solution-phase cadmium/L was required to inhibit reductive dehalogenation. In microcosms containing an organic matter--dominated soil, more than an order of magnitude higher cadmium concentration (0.2 mg solution-phase cadmium/L) was required to inhibit dehalogenation. Furthermore, results showed that the dehalogenation pathway used was affected by the cadmium concentration. A single dehalogenation pathway was observed until the cadmium concentration neared the inhibitory concentration. At this point, a second degradation pathway was observed. This suggests that cadmium stress selected for a different dehalogenating population. Sediments have also been shown to mediate metal toxicity. The impact of metals on reductive dehalogenation of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in a waste lagoon sediment co-contaminated with cadmium and lead has been investigated (Jackson and Pardue 1998). In this study, cadmium and lead inhibited reductive dehalogenation, but only when not bound to sediment material and present in the free, bioavailable form.

Relationships between Metal Concentration and Inhibition of Biodegradation

The data presented thus far suggest that inhibition increases progressively as the concentration of bioavailable metal in a co-contaminated environment increases (Figure 2A). However, this pattern is not always observed. In fact, there is evidence for two additional patterns of metal effects on organic biodegradation.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Additional pattern 1: low metal concentrations stimulate biodegradation; high metal concentrations inhibit. A number of studies show a pattern of metal toxicity in which low metal concentrations stimulate activity until a maximum level of stimulation is reached, and thereafter, metal toxicity increases with increasing metal concentration (Figure 2B). It should be noted that all these studies used consortia not single isolates. Therefore, it is likely that this pattern is a result of differential toxicity effects, wherein a second population more sensitive to metal stress competes in some way with the population expressing the activity of interest. Inhibition of the second population reduces competition for resources needed by the first population. Supporting this pattern is evidence from Capone et al. (1983) that methanogenesis was stimulated by the addition of some metals. The authors suggested that this may have been due to differential inhibition of the methanogenic and nonmethanogenic microorganisms. Metals may have selected for a metal-resistant, methanogenic population, which reduced competition from a metal-sensitive, nonmethanogenic population. Similarly, Kuo and Genthner (1996) reported that the addition of some metals at low levels stimulated biodegradation. Hexavalent chromium (0.01 mg total chromium/L) increased the biodegradation rate of PH by 177% and that of BEN by 169% over controls containing no metals. Copper and cadmium (both at 0.01 mg total metal/L) increased the BEN biodegradation rate 185% and the 2CP biodegradation rate by 168%. Furthermore, 1-2 mg total mercury/L increased the biodegradation rates of 2CPand 3-chlorophenol (3CP) by 133-154%.

Similar results have been reported (Hughes and Poole 1989; Sterritt and Lester 1980). These groups suggested the stimulatory effect may be due to metals reducing competition for reducing equivalents or nutrients between metal-resistant degraders and metal-sensitive nondegraders. As in the work of Roberts et al. (1998) and Capone et al. (1983), the impact of metals on microbially mediated processes in these studies may be due mainly to the effects of metals on a population other than the one carrying out the process of interest. The existence of this pattern of metal effects underscores the importance of considering not only the physiological impact of a toxic metal on a target-degrading population but also the ecological impact of the toxic metal.

Additional pattern 2: low metal concentrations inhibit biodegradation; high metal concentrations inhibit less. Some studies have shown that low concentrations of metals increasingly inhibit activity until a maximum level of inhibition is reached, and thereafter, metal toxicity decreases with increasing metal concentration (Figure 2C). The work reported by Said and Lewis (1991) generally shows that 2,4-DME biodegradation decreased as the metal concentration increased (Figure 2A). However, a closer examination of their data reveals that the maximal degradation rate of 2,4-DME ([V.sub.max]) was significantly less in the presence of 10 [micro]M cadmium (0.61 4 [+ or -] 0.03 [micro]g 2,4-DME/L/min) than in the presence of 100 [micro]M cadmium (0.74 [+ or -] 0.00 [micro]g 2,4-DME/L/min). In a later study, a similar pattern of inhibition was observed as populations of 2,4-D degraders in a cadmium-contaminated soil were reported to be more resistant to cadmium toxicity at a higher concentration of cadmium (40 mg total cadmium/L) than at a lower concentration of cadmium (20 mg total cadmium/L) (Roane and Pepper 1997). These responses to metals might be explained by microbial community dynamics wherein high metal concentrations create selective pressure for metal-resistant, organic-degrading microorganisms. This selective pressure may have reduced competition from metal-sensitive, nondegrading microorganisms, thus increasing biodegradation at higher metal concentrations; however, this pattern has also been observed in a pure culture study of the effect of cadmium on NAPH biodegradation by a Burkholderia sp. (Sandrin et al. 2000). Whereas solution-phase cadmium concentrations from 1 to 50 mg/L increasingly inhibited NAPH biodegradation, the highest investigated concentration of solution-phase cadmium (100 mg/L) showed reduced inhibition of NAPH biodegradation. It is possible that at high cadmium concentrations, cadmium uptake was reduced. This hypothesis is supported by a study showing that the initial rate of cadmium uptake by E. coli K-12 was lower at a higher cadmium concentration (5.0 [micro]M) than at a lower cadmium concentration (2.5 [micro]M) (Laddaga and Silver 1985). It also remains possible that high metal concentrations may more rapidly induce a metal-resistance mechanism important in cadmium detoxification (e.g., an efflux pump) than low metal concentrations.

In summary, the existence of different patterns of response to metals complicates understanding and predicting metal toxicity in the environment. As demonstrated by the patterns described above, metals may impact both the physiology and ecology of pollutant-degrading microorganisms. For this reason models designed to predict the impact of metals on biodegradation may fail to do so accurately unless they incorporate both physiologic and ecologic impacts of metals on organic-degrading microorganisms.

Approaches to Increasing Biodegradation in Co-contaminated Environments

A review of the literature shows a number of possible approaches that can be used to lower metal bioavailability and/or increase microbial tolerance to metals. These include inoculation with metal-resistant microorganisms and addition of materials that reduce metal bioavailability, including calcium carbonate, phosphate, clay minerals, and surfactants.

Metal-resistant bacteria. Microorganisms exhibit several types of metal resistance (Ji and Silver 1995; Nies 1992, 1999; Nies and Silver 1995; Rosen 1996; Silver 1996; Silver and Phung 1996). For example, many microorganisms can mitigate the toxicity of some metals (e.g., divalent mercury and arsenate) through reduction by using the metals as electron acceptors. However, many toxic metals such as cadmium (redox potential, -824 mV) have redox potentials outside the aerobic physiologic redox range (from -421 mV to +808 mV). Thus, their toxicity cannot be mitigated by reduction. Other mechanisms of metal resistance are common and include intra- and extracellular metal sequestration, metal reduction, metal efflux pumps, and production of metal chelators such as metallothioneins and biosurfactants. Microorganisms may be capable of acclimating to metal toxicity, as has been suggested for mercury (Liebert et al. 1991). Thus far, only one study has investigated inoculation with metal-resistant bacteria to enhance organic contaminant biodegradation in a co-contaminated system (Roane et al. 2001). In this study, soil microcosms were co-contaminated with 2,4-D (500 mg/kg) and cadmium (60 mg total cadmium/kg). Because this soil did not contain an active 2,4-D-degrading population, inoculation with A. eutrophus JMP134, a 2,4-D degrader, was required; however, JMP134 is sensitive to cadmium. For rapid degradation of 2,4-D to be achieved, it was necessary to inoculate with both JMP134 and a cadmium-resistant isolate, Pseudomonas H1, which accumulates cadmium intracellularly. These results suggest that in the presence of a toxic metal, inoculation with metal-resistant microorganisms that reduce bioavailable metal concentrations via sequestration will foster increased biodegradation.

Treatment additives. Treatment additives such as calcium carbonate, phosphate, cement, manganese oxide, and magnesium hydroxide can be added to metal-contaminated sites to reduce metal bioavailability and mobility (Hettiarachchi et al. 2000; Ruby et al. 1994; Traina and Laperche 1999). Despite the well-documented ability of treatment additives to reduce metal mobility and solubility, only a single study has examined the impact of such reductions on metal toxicity to pollutant-degrading soil microorganisms. Jonioh et al. (1999) examined the effect of calcium carbonate on the toxicity of lead to microorganisms isolated from a military rifle range soil contaminated with lead and other heavy metals. Using the Microtox assay, which uses a luminescence assay to determine viability (Strategic Diagnostics, Inc., Newark, DE), calcium carbonate was found to reduce lead toxicity when added at 1, 2.5, 5, and 10%. For example, the effective concentration of lead-contaminated soil required for a 50% reduction in loss of luminescence increased from 14% in the absence of calcium carbonate to 75% in the presence of 10% calcium carbonate. Calcium carbonate was found to decrease lead leachability and to raise the soil pH. Because metal bioavailability typically decreases as pH increases, the additive likely reduced lead toxicity by reducing lead bioavailability. These promising results suggest that treatment additives may be an effective means to increase organic pollutant biodegradation in the presence of toxic levels of metals.

Clay minerals. Metal bioavailability and resulting toxicity have been reduced using clay minerals. For example, the addition of kaolinite (1-20%) or montmorillonite (1-5%) to an agar medium containing cadmium reduced the toxicity of cadmium to fungi, bacteria, and an actinomycete (Babich and Stotzky 1977b; 1978). Similarly, in solution studies, Kamel (1986) reported that 3% bentonite and vermiculite reduced the toxicity of 150 mg total cadmium/L to Streptomyces bottropensis. Kaolinite also reduced cadmium toxicity, but more was required (6% vs 3%), and less protection was afforded than with the other clays. In general, increasing protection from cadmium toxicity was observed as the clay concentration increased, and the amount of protection each clay afforded correlated well with its CEC. The most effective clay, vermiculite, had a CEC of 108.7 meq/g, whereas the least effective clay, kaolinite, had a CEC of only 4.8 meq/g.

The impact of clay addition on metal toxicity was less pronounced in soil than in the plate and solution studies described above. Babich and Stotzky (1977b) found that 3-12% montmorillonite was required to reduce cadmium toxicity to various fungi in soil; however, kaolinite failed to reduce toxicity. As with the results of their plate studies, the low CEC of kaolinite appeared to explain its failure to reduce metal bioavailability and hence toxicity.

Chelating agents. Chelating agents have been employed to reduce metal toxicity to organic-degrading microorganisms. Ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) reduces the toxicity of cadmium to Chlorella sp. (Upitis et al. 1973), of nickel to algae (Spencer and Nichols 1983) and an actinomycete (Babich et al. 1983b), and of copper to bacteria and algae (Sunda and Guillard 1976). However, the toxicity of EDTA to many microorganisms and its limited biodegradability reduce its suitability for application to the bioremediation of co-contaminated environments (Borgmann and Norwood 1995; Braide 1984; Ibim et al. 1992; Ogundele 1999). For this reason, the use of other chelating agents to reduce metal toxicity is of greater interest.

Malakul et al. (1998) have shown that a commercially available chelating resin (Chelex 100; Biorad, Hercules, CA) and surfactant-modified clays reduced cadmium toxicity during biodegradation of NAPH. Clays were modified by adsorbing a cationic surfactant to the clay surface to which various metal-binding ligands (e.g., palmitic acid) were attached via hydrophobic interactions. NAPH biodegradation occurred at higher cadmium concentrations in the presence of either Chelex 100 or the modified clays than in controls containing either no clay or unmodified clay. The abilities of the resin and the modified clays to reduce cadmium toxicity were quantitatively related to the metal adsorption characteristics of the two chelating agents.

Microbially produced surfactants (biosurfactants) show promise for enhancing organic biodegradation in the presence of metals. Sandrin et al. (2000) showed that a rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by P. aeruginosa reduced cadmium toxicity during NAPH biodegradation by a Burkholderia sp. in solution studies. The mechanism by which the biosurfactant reduced cadmium toxicity appeared to involve a combination of rhamnolipid complexation of cadmium and rhamnolipid-induced lipopolysaccharide release from the outer membrane of the degrader (Al-Tahhan et al. 2000; Goldberg et al. 1983; Leive 1965). Maslin and Maier (2000) used the same biosurfactant to reduce cadmium toxicity during biodegradation of PHEN by indigenous populations in two soils co-contaminated with PHEN and cadmium. PHEN mineralization was increased from 7.5 to 35% in one soil and from 10 to 58% in the second soil in response to up to three applications of rhamnolipid. Repeated application was necessary because of biodegradation of rhamnolipid, which occurred in 2-3 weeks.

Possible approaches: pH and divalent cations. Two environmental factors that profoundly impact the toxicity of metals to microorganisms are pH (Babich and Stotzky 1977a, 1977c, 1985; Babich et al. 1983, 1985; Korkeala and Pekkanen 1978) and the presence of inorganic cations (Babich and Stotzky 1979) and anions (Forsberg 1978). Curiously, manipulation of either of these factors as a means to increase organic biodegradation in the presence of metals has gone largely unexplored.

pH. pH has been widely reported to mediate metal toxicity (Babich et al. 1985). Increasing pH reduced the toxicity of nickel to bacteria, an actinomycete, a yeast, and a filamentous fungus (Babich and Stotzky 1982a, 1982b, 1983a, 1983c). In contrast and more commonly reported, increasing pH increases the toxicity of metals. For example, increasing pH increased the toxicity of zinc to filamentous fungi and of cadmium to bacteria (Babich and Stotzky 1977c, 1983a, 1983c; Korkeala and Pekkanen 1978), of copper and uranium to Chlorella sp. (Franklin et al. 2000), and of zinc to algae (Hargreaves and Whitton 1976).

The mechanism by which pH mediates metal toxicity to microorganisms has not been established but may involve a) the preference of a microorganism for a particular growth pH in the absence of a toxic metal (i.e., the microorganism is acidophilic or alkaliphilic) (Babich and Stotzky 1983a); b) a reduction in heavy metal adsorption and uptake by microorganisms, as has been shown in Burkholderia sp. (Sandrin and Maier 2002), in C. regularis (Sakaguchi et al. 1979), and in Klebsiella pneumonia (Rudd et al. 1983); and/or c) the speciation of the metal in question to a more or less toxic form (Babich and Stotzky 1985; Collins and Stotzky 1992; Ivanov et al. 1997). Data from one of the studies described above (Franklin et al. 2000) suggest that even relatively small changes in pH (e.g., from 6.5 to 5.7) can reduce metal toxicity. A commonly used method to remediate metal-contaminated soils involves washing with acidic solutions to facilitate mobilization and flushing of the metal from the soil matrix (Pichtel and Pichtel 1997; Roane et al. 1996; Tuin and Tels 1991). With this approach, it may be feasible to reduce the pH of a metal and organic co-contaminated soil to first optimize organic biodegradation. After biodegradation of the organic contaminant had occurred, the pH of the soil could be further reduced to maximize metal leaching. Suggesting that this approach may be effective, Sandrin and Maier (2002) found that cadmium toxicity during NAPH biodegradation could be reduced by lowering pH from 7 to 4.

Divalent cations. Divalent cations, such as zinc, have been reported to mitigate metal toxicity. Higham et al. (1985) showed that addition of 60 lam total zinc reduced toxicity of 3 mM total cadmium to P. putida. Specifically, the lag phase was reduced, and the growth rate and cell yield were increased. Zinc had no effect on cells grown without cadmium. Similarly, magnesium reduced toxicity of nickel to bacteria and yeast (Abelson and Aldous 1950), to filamentous fungi (Babich and Stotzky 1981, 1982a, 1983b, 1983c), and to a filamentous alga (Say and Whitton 1977). Calcium has been reported to reduce cadmium toxicity to an alga (Gipps and Coller 1982) and to reduce zinc toxicity to a cyanobacterium (Shehata and Whitton 1982) and algae (Harding and Whitton 1977; Rai et al. 1981). The protective effect of divalent cations such as zinc against metal toxicity is not limited to microorganisms. Zinc has been implicated in protection from cadmium-induced formation of tumors (Gunn et al. 1963), sarcomas (Gunn et al. 1964), and lesion development in rats and mice (Gabbiani et al. 1976).

Despite the widespread demonstration of the protective effects of divalent cations such as zinc against metal toxicity, little is understood with regard to the mechanism of protection. However, cadmium uptake has been found to be very dependent on zinc concentration. In studies investigating uptake of [sup.109][Cd.sup.2+], zinc was a competitive inhibitor of cadmium uptake and exhibited a [K.sub.i] of 4.6 [micro]M (Laddaga and Silver 1985). A more detailed understanding of the mode of protection by divalent cations might lead to the development of strategies to bioremediate co-contaminated sites in which a relatively nontoxic divalent cation (e.g., calcium) is added to a site to induce metal resistance and enhance organic biodegradation. Sandrin (2000) investigated the ability of seven divalent cations (calcium, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, zinc) to reduce inhibition of NAPH biodegradation caused by 10 and 37.5 mg solution-phase cadmium/L. Addition of 90 mg total zinc/L to treatments containing 37.5 mg solution-phase cadmium/L cadmium eliminated a 48-hr cadmium-induced lag phase. The remaining cations had inhibitory or no effects on NAPH biodegradation. Additional research is required to ascertain whether less toxic cations can be used to elicit similar effects.

Conclusions

The timely and cost-effective remediation of metal and organic co-contaminated sites mandates an understanding of the extent and mechanisms by which toxic metals inhibit organic biodegradation. Past attempts to quantify the impact of metals on biodegradation are difficult to interpret because they have generally been based on total metal rather than solution-phase or bioavailable metal concentrations. This has resulted in reported inhibitory concentrations of metals that vary by as many as 5 orders of magnitude. A crucial first step will be to report consistently solution-phase or bioavailable metal concentrations in the future so that a legitimate comparison of biodegradation behavior in co-contaminated sites can be made. Currently, our best approximation is to measure and use solution-phase metal data. However, new methods of defining and determining bioavailable metal are rapidly being developed. Despite the enormous variance among reported inhibitory concentrations of metals, it remains clear that metals have the potential to inhibit organic biodegradation in both aerobic and anaerobic systems. The mechanisms by which metals inhibit biodegradation vary with the composition and complexity of the system under study and include both physiological and ecological components. A more thorough understanding of these systems taking into account various levels of complexity is needed to develop new approaches to remediation of co-contaminated sires. That said, there already exist a number of approaches, including addition of metal-resistant microorganisms, pH adjustment, and additives that reduce metal bioavailability. However, field trials are needed to validate these approaches.

Table 1. Reported metal concentrations that cause inhibition of aerobic
biodegradation of organic contaminants.

                                      Lowest metal concentration
                                          reported to reduce
Metal                Organic                biodegradation

[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.100 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.629 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D,          < 25.3-50.6 mg/L (a,b)
                XYL, IPB, NAPH, BP
[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-D                     > 3 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-D                       24 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-D                       0.060 mg/g (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2,4-D                       0.060 mg/g (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   PHEN                        1 mg/L (d)
[Cd.sup.2+]   NAPH                        1 mg/L (d)
[Cd.sup.2+]   TOL                         37 mg/L (a)
[Co.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D, XYL,     < 13.3-1,330 mg/L (a,b)
                IPB, NAPH, BP
[Cr.sup.3+]   2,4-DME                     0.177 mg/L (a)
[Cr.sup.6+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D, XYL,     < 131 mg/L (a,b)
                IPB, NAPH, BP
[Cu.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.076 mg/L (a)
[Cu.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.027 mg/L (a)
[Cu.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D, XYL,     < 14.3-71.6 mg/L (a,b)
              IPB, NAPH, BP
[Cu.sup.2+]   PHB                         8 mg/L (d)
[Cu.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   6.30 mg/L (a)
[Cu.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   11.25 mg/L (a)
[Cu.sup.2+]   PH                          0.01 mg/L (a)
[Hg.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.002 mg/L (a)
[Hg.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D, XYL,     < 45.2-226 mg/L (a,b)
                IPB, NAPH, BP
[Mn.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   317.0 mg/L (a)
[Mn.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   28.2 mg/L (a)
[Ni.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D, XYL,       5.18-10.3 mg/L (a,b)
                IPB, NAPH, BP
[Ni.sup.2+]   TOL                         20 mg/L (a)
[Pb.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   2.80 mg/L (a)
[Pb.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   1.41 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.006 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   2,4-DME                     0.041 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   4CP, 3CB, 2,4-D,          < 29.5-736 mg/L (a,b)
              XYL, IPB, NAPH, BP
[Zn.sup.2+]   PH                          10 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   0.43 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   Crude oil                   0.46 mg/L (a)
[Zn.sup.2+]   TOL                         2.8 mg/L (a)

Metal                Microbe studied                Environment

[Cd.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Sediment (microcosm)
[Cd.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Aufwuchs (c) (microcosm)
[Cd.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes spp., Pseudomonas   Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Cd.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134    Mineral salts medium
[Cd.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134    Mineral salts medium
                                                containing cadmium-
                                                resistant isolate
[Cd.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134    Soil microcosms
[Cd.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134    Field-scale bioreactors
[Cd.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Soil microcosms
[Cd.sup.2+]   Burkholderia sp.                Dilute mineral salts
                                                medium containing 1.4
                                                mM phosphate
[Cd.sup.2+]   Bacillus sp.                    Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 36 mM
                                                phosphate
[Co.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes spp., Pseudomonas   Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Cr.sup.3+]   Indigenous community            Aufwuchs (c) (microcosm)
[Cr.sup.6+]   Alcaligenes spp., Pseudomonas   Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Cu.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Sediment (microcosm)
[Cu.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Aufwuchs (c) (microcosm)
[Cu.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes sp., Pseudomonas    Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Cu.sup.2+]   Acidovorax delafieldii          Agar plates containing
                                                4.70 mM phosphate
[Cu.sup.2+]   Pseudomonas sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Cu.sup.2+]   Micrococcus sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Cu.sup.2+]   Acinetobactercalcoaceticus,     Bioreactor medium
              AH strain                         containing 0.15 mM
                                                phosphate
[Hg.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Aufwuchs (c) (microcosm)
[Hg.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes sp., Pseudomonas    Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Mn.sup.2+]   Pseudomonas sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Mn.sup.2+]   Micrococcus sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Ni.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes sp., Pseudomonas    Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Ni.sup.2+]   Bacillus sp.                    Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 36 mM
                                                phosphate
[Pb.sup.2+]   Pseudomonas sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Pb.sup.2+]   Micrococcus sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Zn.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Sediment (microcosm)
[Zn.sup.2+]   Indigenous community            Aufwuchs (c) (microcosm)
[Zn.sup.2+]   Alcaligenes sp., Pseudomonas    Tris-buffered minimal
                spp., Moraxella sp.             medium plates
[Zn.sup.2+]   Acinetobacter calcoaceticus,    Bioreactor medium
                AH strain                       containing 0.15 mM
                                                phosphate
[Zn.sup.2+]   Pseudomonas sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Zn.sup.2+]   Micrococcus sp.                 Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 31 mM
                                                phosphate
[Zn.sup.2+]   Bacillus sp.                    Mineral salts medium
                                                containing 36 mM
                                                phosphate

Metal         pH          Reference

[Cd.sup.2+]   6.5   Said and Lewis 1991
[Cd.sup.2+]   5.6   Said and Lewis 1991
[Cd.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Cd.sup.2+]   6.0   Roane et al. 2001
[Cd.sup.2+]   6.0   Roane et al. 2001
[Cd.sup.2+]   8.2   Roane et al. 2001
[Cd.sup.2+]   8.2   Roane et al. 2001
[Cd.sup.2+]   7.6   Maslin and Maier 2000
[Cd.sup.2+]   6.5   Sandrin et al. 2000
[Cd.sup.2+]   5.9   Amor et al. 2001
[Co.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Cr.sup.3+]   6.1   Said and Lewis 1991
[Cr.sup.6+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Cu.sup.2+]   6.1   Said and Lewis 1991
[Cu.sup.2+]   5.0   Said and Lewis 1991
[Cu.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Cu.sup.2+]   6.9   Birch and Brandl 1996
[Cu.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Cu.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Cu.sup.2+]   7.8   Nakamura and
                      Sawada 2000
[Hg.sup.2+]   6.8   Said and Lewis 1991
[Hg.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Mn.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Mn.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Ni.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Ni.sup.2+]   5.9   Amor et al. 2001
[Pb.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Pb.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Zn.sup.2+]   6.4   Said and Lewis 1991
[Zn.sup.2+]   5.6   Said and Lewis 1991
[Zn.sup.2+]   7.0   Springael et al. 1993
[Zn.sup.2+]   7.8   Nakamura and
                      Sawada 2000
[Zn.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Zn.sup.2+]   7.2   Benka-Coker and
                      Ekundayo 1998
[Zn.sup.2+]   5.9   Amor et al. 2001

Abbreviations: BP, biphenyl; IPB, isopropylbenzene; MTC, maximum
tolerated concentration; TOL, toluene; XYL, xylene.

(a) Value represents total metal added to system. (b) Value represents
MIC calculated by multiplying MTC by a factor of 2.25. MIC = MTC x
2.25. (c) Floating algal mats. (d) Value represents solution-phase
concentration of metal present in system.

Table 2. Reported metal concentrations that cause inhibition of
anaerobic biodegradation of organic contaminants,

                                      Lowest metal concentration
Metal              Organic        reported to reduce biodegradation

[Cd.sup.2+]   TCA                         0.01 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   TCA                         0.2 mg/L (a)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2CP, PH, BEN, 3CB           0.5-1.0 mg/L (b)
[Cd.sup.2+]   2CP, 3CP                    20 mg/L (b)
[Cd.sup.2+]   HCB                         0.001 mg/g (b)
[Cr.sup.6+]   2CP, PH, BEN, 3CB           0.01-0.5 mg/L (b)
[Cr.sup.2+]   2CP, 3CP                    20 mg/L (b)
[Cu.sup.2+]   2CP, PH, BEN, 3CB           0.1-1.0 mg/L (b)
[Cu.sup.2+]   2CP, 3CP                    20 mg/L (b)
[Cu.sup.2+]   2,4-DANT, RDX               4 mg/g (b)
[Cu.sup.2+]   4-ADNT                      8 mg/g (b)
[Hg.sup.2+]   2CP, PH, BEN, 3CB           0.1-1.0 mg/L (b)
[Pb.sup.2+]   HCB                         0.001 mg/g (b)
[Pb.sup.2+]   2,4-DANT, RDX               > 1 mg/g (b)
[Zn.sup.2+]   PCP                         2 mg/L (b)
[Zn.sup.2+]   2,4-DANT                    1.5 mg/g (b)
[Zn.sup.2+]   NB                          10 mg/L (b)
[Zn.sup.2+]   PCP                         8.6 mg/L (b)

Metal           Microbe(s) studied                 Environment

[Cd.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Laboratory soil microcosms
                                        containing rice paddy and
                                        bottomland hardwood soils
[Cd.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Laboratory soil microcosms
                                        containing organic matter-rich
                                        soil
[Cd.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Aqueous sediment enrichment
                                        in anaerobic growth medium
[Cd.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Sediment slurry
[Cd.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Microcosms containing
                                        contaminated sediment
[Cr.sup.6+]    Indigenous community   Aqueous sediment enrichment
                                        in anaerobic growth medium
[Cr.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Sediment slurry
[Cu.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Aqueous sediment enrichment in
                                        anaerobic growth medium
[Cu.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Sediment slurry
[Cu.sup.2+]    Indigenous commumty    Soil slurry containing 50 mM
                                        phosphate buffer
[Cu.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Soil slurry containing 50 mM
                                        phosphate buffer
[Hg.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Aqueous sediment enrichment in
                                        anaerobic growth medium
[Pb.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Microcosms containing
                                        contaminated sediment
[Pb.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Soil slurry containing 50 mM
                                        phosphate buffer
[Zn.sup.2+]    Indigenous commumty    Anaerobic digester sludge in a
                                        liquid medium containing
                                        0.6 mM phosphate
[Zn.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Soil slurry containing 50 mM
                                        phosphate buffer
[Zn.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Anaerobic enrichment cultures
                                        in serum bottles
[Zn.sup.2+]    Indigenous community   Anaerobic enrichment cultures
                                        in serum bottles

Metal           pH              Reference

[Cd.sup.2+]   6.9-7.4   Pardue et al. 1996
[Cd.sup.2+]     6.8     Pardue et al. 1996
[Cd.sup.2+]     7.0     Kuo and Genthner 1996
[Cd.sup.2+]     7.0     Kong 1998
[Cd.sup.2+]     NR      Jackson and Pardue 1998
[Cr.sup.6+]     7.0     Kuo and Genthner 1996
[Cr.sup.2+]     7.0     Kong 1998
[Cu.sup.2+]     7.0     Kuo and Genthner 1996
[Cu.sup.2+]     7.0     Kong 1998
[Cu.sup.2+]     6.5     Roberts et al. 1998
[Cu.sup.2+]     6.5     Roberts et al. 1998
[Hg.sup.2+]     7.0     Kuo and Genthner 1996
[Pb.sup.2+]     NR      Jackson and Pardue 1998
[Pb.sup.2+]     6.5     Roberts et al. 1998
[Zn.sup.2+]     NR      Jin and Bhattacharya 1996
[Zn.sup.2+]     6.5     Roberts et al. 1998
[Zn.sup.2+]     NR      Majumdar et al. 1999
[Zn.sup.2+]     NR      Majumdar et al. 1999

Abbreviations: 4-ADNT, 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene; NB, nitrobenzene;
NR, not reported; RDX, hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine.

(a) Value represents solution-phase concentration of metal present in
system. (b) Value represents total metal added to system.

REFERENCES

Abelson PH, Aldous E. 1950. Ion antagonism in microorganisms: interference of normal magnesium metabolism by nickel, cobalt, cadmium, zinc, and manganese. J Bacteriol 60:401-413.

Al-Tahhan R, Sandrin T, Bodour A, Meier R. 2000. Cell surface hydrophobicity of P. aeruginosa: effect of monorhamnolipid on fatty acid and lipopolysaccharide content. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3262-3268.

Alexander M. 1999. Biodegradation and Bioremediation. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.

Amor L, Kennes C, Veiga MC. 2001, Kinetics of inhibition in the biodegradation of monoaromatic hydrocarbons in presence of heavy metals. Bioresource Technol 78:181-185.

Angle JS, Chaney RL. 1989. Cadmium resistance screening in nitrilotriacetate-buffered minimal media. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2101-2104.

Baath E. 1989. Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations. Water Air Soil Poll 47:335-379.

Babich H, Devanes MA, Stotzky G. 1985. The mediation of mutagenicity end clastogenicity of heavy metals by physicochemical factors. Environ Res 37:253-286.

Bench H, Schiffenbauer M, Stotzky G. 1983, Further studies on environmental factors that modify the toxicity of nickel to microbes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 3:82-99.

Babich H, Stotzky G. 1977a. Effect of cadmium on fungi and on interactions between fungi and bacteria in soil--influence of clay minerals and pH. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1059-1066.

--. 1977b. Reductions in toxicity of cadmium to microorganisms by clay minerals. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:696-705.

--. 1977c. Sensitivity of various bacteria, including actinomycetes, and fungi to cadmium and the influence of pH on sensitivity. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:681-695.

--. 1978. Effect of cadmium on microbes in vitro and in vivo: influence of clay minerals. In: Microbial Ecology (Babich H, Stotzky G, eds). Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 412-415.

--. 1979. Differential toxicities of mercury to bacteria and bacteriophages in sea and in lake water. Can J Microbiol 25:1252-1257.

--. 1981. Components of water hardness that reduce the toxicity of nickel to fungi. Microbios Lett 18:17-24.

--. 1982a. Nickel toxicity to fungi: influence of some environmental factors. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 6:577-589.

--. 1982b. Nickel toxicity to microbes: effect of pH and implications for acid rain. Environ Res 29:335-350.

--. 1983a. Influence of chemical speciation on the toxicity of heavy metals to the microbiota. In: Aquatic Toxicology (Niragu JO, ed). New York:Wiley, 1-46.

--. 1983b. Nickel toxicity to estuarine/marine fungi and its amelioration by magnesium in sea water. Water Air Soil Poll 19:193-202.

--. 1983c. Temperature, pH, salinity, hardness, and particulates mediate nickel toxicity to eubacteria, an actinomycete, and yeasts in lake, simulated estuarine, and sea waters. Aquat Toxicol 3:195-208.

--. 1985. Heavy metal toxicity to microbe mediated ecologic processes--a review and potential application to regulatory policies. Environ Res 36:111-137 (1985).

Bardgett RD, Saggar S. 1994. Effects of heavy metal contamination on the short term decomposition of [sup.14C]glucose in a pasture soil. Soil Biol Biochem 26:727-733.

Benka-Coker MO, Ekundayo JA. 1998. Effects of heavy metals on growth of species of Micrococcus and Pseudomonas in a crude oil/mineral salts medium. Bioresource Technol 66:241-245.

Birch L, Brandl H. 1996. A rapid method for the determination of metal toxicity to the biodegradation of water insoluble polymers. Fresen J Anal Chem 354:760-762.

Blake DA, Blake RC, Khosraviani M, Parlor AR. 1998. Immunoassays for metal ions. Anal Chim Acta. 376:13-19.

Borgmann U, Norwood WP. 1995. EDTA toxicity and background concentrations of copper and zinc in Hyalella azteca. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:875-881.

Braide VB. 1984. Calcium EDTA toxicity--renal excretion of endogenous trace metals and the effect of repletion on collagen degradation in the rat. Gert Pharmacol 15:37-41.

Burkhardt C, Insam H, Hutchinson TC, Reber HH. 1993. Impact of heavy metals on the degradative capabilities of soil bacterial communities. Biol Fertil Soils 16:154-156.

Capone DB, Reese DD, Kiene, RP. 1983. Effects of metals on methanogenesis, sulfate reduction, carbon dioxide evolution, and microbial biomass in anoxic salt marsh sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1586-1591.

Collins YE, Stotzky G. 1992. Heavy metals after the electrokinetic properties of bacteria, yeasts, and clay minerals. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1592-1600.

Corbisier P, Van Der Lelie D, Borremans B, Provoost A., De Lorenzo V, Brown NL, et al. 1999. Whole cell and protein based biosensors for the detection of bioavailable heavy metals in environmental samples. Anal Chim Acta 387:235-244.

Doelman,P, Haanstra L. 1979a. Effect of lead on soil respiration and dehydrogenase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 11:475-479.

--. 1979b. Effects of lead on the decomposition of organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 11:481-485.

Forsberg CW. 1978. Effects of heavy metals and other trace elemerits on the fermentative activity of the rumen microflora and growth of functionally important rumen bacteria. Can J Microbiol 24:298-306.

Franklin NM, Stauber JL, Markich SJ, Lim RP. 2000. pH-dependent toxicity of copper and uranium to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.). Aquat Toxicol 48:275-289.

Gabbiani G, Gregory A, Baic D. 1976. Cadmium induced selective lesions of sensory ganglia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 26:498-506.

Gipps JF, Collar BAW. 1982. Effect of some nutrient cations on uptake of cadmium by Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 33:979-987.

Goldberg SS, Cordeiro MN, Silva Pereira AA, Mares-Guia ML. 1983. Release of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from cell surface of Trypanosoma cruzi by EDTA. Int J Parasitol 13:11-18.

Gunn SA, Gould TC, Anderson WAD. 1963. Cadmium-induced interstitial cell tumors in rats and mice and their prevention by zinc. J Natl Cancer Inst. 31:745-749.

--. 1964. Effect of zinc on carcinogenesis by cadmium. Proc Soc Exp Biol Meal 115:653-657.

Hahne HCH, Kroontje W. 1973. Significance of pH and chloride concentration on behavior of heavy metal pollutants: mercury (II), cadmium (II), zinc (II), and lead (II). J Environ Qual 2:444-450.

Harding JPC, Whitton BA. 1977. Environmental factors reducing the toxicity of zinc to Stigeoclonium tenue. Br Phycol 12:17-21.

Hargreaves JW, Whitton, BA. 1976. Effect of pH on tolerance of Hormidium rivulare to zinc and copper. Oecologia 26:235-243.

Hettiarachchi GM, Pierzynski GM, Ransom MD. 2000. In situ stabilization of soil lead using phosphorus and manganese oxide. Environ Sci Technol 34:4614-4619.

Hickey RF, Vanderwielen J, Switzenbaum MS. 1989. The effect of heavy metals on methane production and hydrogen and carbon monoxide levels during batch anaerobic sludge digestion. Water Res 23:207-218.

Higham DP, Sadler PJ, Scawen MD. 1985. Cadmium resistance in Pseudomonas putida: growth and uptake of cadmium. J Gen Microbiol 131:2539-2544.

Hughes MN, Poole RK. Metal Toxicity. 1989. In: Metals and Microorganisms (Hughes MN, Poole RK, eds). New York:Chapman and Hall, 252-302.

--. 1991. Metal speciation and microbial growth--the hard (and soft) facts. J Gert Microbiol 137:725-734.

Ibim SEM, Trotman J, Musey PI, Semafuko WEB. 1992. Depletion of essential elements by calcium disodium EDTA treatment in the dog. Toxicology 73:229-237.

Ivanov AY, Fomchenkov VM, Khasanova LA, Gavryushkin AV. 1997. Toxic effect of hydroxylated heavy metal ions on the plasma membrane of bacterial cells. Microbiology 66:588-594.

Jackson WA, Pardue JH. 1998. Assessment of metal inhibition of reductive dechlorination of hexachiorobenzene at a Superfund site. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1441-1446.

Ji GY, Silver S. 1995. Bacterial resistance mechanisms for heavy metals of environmental concern. J Ind Microbiol 14:61-75.

Jin PK, Bhattacharya SK. 1996. Anaerobic removal of pentachlorophenol in presence of zinc. J Environ Eng 122:590-598.

Jonioh V, Obbard JP, Stanforth RR. 1999. Impact of treatment additives used to reduce lead solubility and microbial toxicity in contaminated soils. In: Bioremediation of Metals and Inorganic Compounds (Leeson A, Alleman BC, eds). Columbus, OH:Battelle Press, 7-12.

Kachur AV, Koch CJ, Biaglow JE. 1998. Mechanism of copper-catalyzed oxidation of glutathione. Free Radic Res 28:259-269.

Kamashwaran SR, Crawford DL. 2001. Anaerobic biodegradation of pentachlorophenol in mixtures containing cadmium by two physiologically distinct microbial enrichment cultures. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27(1):11-17.

Kamel Z. 1986. Toxicity of cadmium to two Streptomyces species as affected by clay minerals. Plant Soil 93:193-205.

Khosraviani M, Pavlov AR, Flowers GC, Blake DA. 1998. Detection of heavy metals by immunoassay: optimization and validation of a rapid, portable assay for ionic cadmium. Environ Sci Technol 32:137-142.

Knight BP, Mcgrath SP, Chaudri AM. 1997. Biomass carbon measurements and substrate utilization patterns of microbial populations from soils amended with cadmium, copper, or zinc. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:39-43.

Kong IC. 1998. Metal toxicity on the dechlorination of monochlorophenols in fresh and acclimated anaerobic sediment slurries. Water Sci Technol 38:143-150.

Korkeala H, Pekkanen TJ. 1978. The effect of pH and potassium phosphate buffer on the toxicity of cadmium for bacteria. Acta Vet Scand 19:93-101.

Kouzelikatsiri A, Kartsonas N, Priffis A. 1988. Assessment of the toxicity of heavy metals to the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Environ Technol Lett 9:261-270.

Kuo CW, Genthner 8RS. 1996. Effect of added heavy metal ions on biotransformation and biodegradation of 2-chlorophenol and 3-chlorobenzoate in anaerobic bacterial consortia. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2317-2323.

Laddaga RA, Silver S. 1985. Cadmium uptake in Escherichia coil K-12. J Bacteriol 162:1100-1105.

Leive L. 1965. Release of lipopolysaccharide by EDTA treatment of E. coil. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 21:290-296.

Liebert CA, Barkay T, Turner RR. 1991. Acclimation of aquatic microbial communities to Hg(II) and C[H.sup.3][Hg.sup.+] in polluted fresh water ponds. Microb Ecol 21(2):139-149.

Lin CY. 1993. Effect of heavy metals on acidogenesis in anaerobic digestion. Water Res 27:147-152.

Liu CH, Jay JA, Ford TE, 2001. Evaluation of environmental effects on metal transport from capped contaminated sediment under conditions of submarine groundwater discharge. Environ Sci Technol 35:4549-4555.

Majumdar P, Bandyopadhyay S, Bhattacharya SK. 1999. Effects of heavy metals on the biodegradation of organic compounds. In: Applied Biotechnology for Site Remediation (Hinchee RE, ed). Boca Raton, FL:Lewis Publishers, 354-359.

Malakul P, Srinivasan KR, Wang HY. 1998. Metal toxicity reduction in naphthalene biodegradation by use of metal chelating adsorbents. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4610-4613.

Masakazu A, Itaya S. 1995. Effects of copper on the metabolism of [sup.14C]-labeled glucose in soil in relation to amendment with organic materials. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 41:245-252.

Maslin P, Maier RM. 2000. Rhamnolipid enhanced mineralization of phenanthrene in organic metal co-contaminated soils. Bioremed J 4:295-308.

Mosey FE. 1976. Assessment of the maximum concentration of heavy metals in crude sewage which will not inhibit the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Water Poll Cont 75:10-19.

Nakamura Y, Sawada T. 2000. Biodegradation of phenol in the presence of heavy metals. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:137-142.

Nandan R, Tondwalkar V, Ray PK. 1990. Biomethanation of spent wash--heavy metal inhibition of methanogenesis in synthetic medium. J Ferment Bioeng 69:276-281.

National Research Council. 1994. Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.

Neilson JW, Maier RM. 2001. Biological techniques for measuring organic and metal contaminants in environmental samples. In: Humic Substances and Chemical Contaminants (Clapp CE, Hayes MHB, Senesi N, Bloom PR, Jardine PM, eds). Madison, WI:Soil Science Society of America, 255-273.

Nies DH. 1992. Resistance to cadmium, cobalt, zinc, and nickel in microbes. Plasmid 27:17-28.

--. 1999. Microbial heavy metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730-750.

Nies DH, Silver S. 1995, Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial metal resistances. J Ind Microbiol 14:186-199.

Ogundele MO. 1999. Cytotoxicity of EDTA used in biological samples: effect on some human breast-milk studies. J Appl Toxicol 19:395-400.

Pankhania IP, Robinson JP. 1984. Heavy metal inhibition of methanogenesis by Methanospirillum hungatei Gp1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 22:277-281.

Pardue JH, Kongara S, Jones WJ. 1996. Effect of cadmium on reductive dechlorination of trichloroaniline. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1083-1088.

Pichtel J, Pichtel TM. 1997. Comparison of solvents for ex situ removal of chromium and lead from contaminated soil. Environ Eng Sci 14:97-104.

Poulson SR, Colberg PJS, Drever JI. 1997. Toxicity of heavy metals (Ni, Zn) to Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Geomicrobiol J 14(1):41-49.

Rai LC, Gaur JP, Kumar HD. 1981. Protective effects of certain environmental factors on the toxicity of zinc, mercury, and methylmercury to Chlorella vulgaris. Environ Res 25:250-259.

Roane TM, Josephson KL, Pepper IL. 2001. Microbial cadmium detoxification allows remediation of co-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3208-3215.

Roane TM, Miller RM, Pepper IL. 1996. Microbial remediation of metals. In: Bioremediation: Principles and Applications (Crawford RL, Crawford DL, eds). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press, 312-340.

Roane TM, Pepper IL. 1997. Microbial remediation of soils co-contaminated with 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and cadmium. In: 12th Annual Conference on Hazardous Waste Research: Building Partnerships for Innovative Technologies, 19-22 May 1997, Kansas City, Missouri. Manhattan, KS:Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous Substance Research Center, 343-356.

Roberts DJ, Venkataraman N, Pendharkar S. 1998. The effect of metals on biological remediation of munitions contaminated soil. Environ Eng Sci 15:265-277.

Rogers JE, Li SW. 1985. Effect of metals and other inorganic ions on soil microbial activity--oil dehydrogenase assay as a simple toxicity test. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34:858-865.

Rosen BP. 1996. Bacterial resistance to heavy metals and metalloids. J Biol Inorg Chem 1:273-277.

Rosner JL, Aumercier M. 1990. Potentiation by salicylate and salicyl alcohol of cadmium toxicity and accumulation in Escherichia coil Appl Environ Microbiol 34:2402-2406.

Rouch DA, Parkhill J, Brown NL. 1995. Induction of bacterial mercury responsive and copper responsive promoters--functional differences between inducible systems and implications for their use in gene fusions for in vivo metal biosensors. J Ind Microbiol 14:349-353.

Ruby MV, Davis A, Nicholson A. 1994. In situ formation of lead phosphates in soils as a method to immobilize lead. Environ Sci Technol 28:646-654.

Rudd T, Sterritt RM, Lester JN. 1983. Mass balance of heavy metal uptake by encapsulated cultures of Klebsiella aerogenes. Microb Ecol 9:261-272,

Said WA, Lewis DL. 1991. Quantitative assessment of the effects of metals on microbial degradation of organic chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1498-1503.

Sakaguchi T, Tsuji T, Nakajima A, Horikoshi T. 1979. Accumulation of cadmium by green microalgae. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 8:207-215.

Sandrin TR. 2000. Naphthalene Biodegradation in a Cadmium Co-contaminated System: Effects of Rhamnolipid, pH, and Divalent Cations [PhD Thesis]. Tucson, AZ:University of Arizona.

Sandrin TR, Chech AM, Maier RM. 2000. A rhamnolipid biosurfactant reduces cadmium toxicity during biodegradation of naphthalene. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4585-4588.

Sandrin TR, Maier RM. 2002. Effect of pH on cadmium toxicity, speciation and accumulation during naphthalene biodegradation. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(10):2075-2079.

Say PJ, Whitton BA. 1977. Influence of zinc on Iotic plants. II. Environmental effects on toxicity of zinc to Hormidium rivulare. Freshwater Biol 7:377-384.

Selifonova O, Burlage R, Barkay T. 1993. 8ioluminescent sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(II) in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(9):3083-3090.

Shehata FHA, Whitton BA. 1982. Zinc tolerances in strains of the blue-green alga Anacystis nidulans. Br Phycol 17:5-12.

Silver S. 1996. Bacterial resitances to toxic metal ions--a review. Gene 179:9-19.

Silver S, Phung LT. t996. Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. Anna Rev Microbiol 50:753-789.

Spencer DF, Nichols LH. 1983. Free nickel inhibits growth of two species of green algae. Environ Pollut Ser 31:97-104.

Springael D, Diels L, Hooyberghs L, Krepsk S, Mergeay M. 1993. Construction and characterization of heavy metal resistant haloaromatic degrading Alcaligenes eutrophus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:334-339.

Staley LJ. 1995. Vitrification technologies for the treatment of contaminated soil. In: Emerging Technologies in Hazardous Waste Management V (Tedder DW, Pohland FG, eds). ACS Symposium Series No. 607. New York:Oxford University Press, 102-120.

Sterritt RM, Lester JN. 1980. Interactions of heavy metals with bacteria. Sci Total Environ 14:5-17.

Sunda W, Guillard RRC. 1976. The relationship between cupric ion activity and the toxicity of copper to phytoplankton. J Mar Res 34:511-529.

Traina SJ, Laperche V. 1999. Contaminant bioavailability in soils, sediments, and aquatic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3365-3371.

Tuin BJW, Tels M. 1991. Continuous treatment of heavy metal contaminated clay soils by extraction in stirred tanks and in a countercurrent column. Environ Technol 12:179-190.

Upitis VV, Pakalne OS, Nollendorf AF. 1973. The dosage of trace elements in the nutrient medium as a factor in increasing the resistance of Chlorella to unfavorable conditions of culturing. Microbiology 42:758-762.

Zoumis T, Schmidt A, Grigorova L, Calmano W. 2001. Contaminants in sediments: remobilisation and demobilisation. Sci Total Environ 266:195-202.

Todd R. Sandrin (1) and Raina M. Maier (2)

(1) Department of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA; (2) Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Address correspondence to T.R. Sandrin, Dept. of Biology and Microbiology, 156 Halsey Science Center, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, 800 Algoma Blvd., Oshkosh, WI 54901 USA. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

We thank W. Maier for his editorial assistance. We also acknowledge support provided by grant P42 ES04940 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship Program.

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Received 17 June 2002; accepted 4 March 2003.