Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,216 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Impact of $150,000 compensation limit for benefit plans.


The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 reduced the limit on the amount of compensation that may be taken into account under qualified pension and profit-sharing plans Profit-Sharing Plan

A plan that gives employees a share in the profits of the company. Each employee receives into an account, a percentage of those profits based on their earnings. Also known as "deferred profit-sharing plan" or "DPSP".
 to $150,000. This limit also applies for deduction limit purposes and for testing plan benefits for nondiscrimination non·dis·crim·i·na·tion  
n.
1. Absence of discrimination.

2. The practice or policy of refraining from discrimination.



non
. Indexed for inflation, the 1993 limit was $235,840.

The reduction is effective for 1994 plan years. Existing accrued benefits Accrued benefits

The pension benefits earned by an employee according to the years of the employee's service.
 at the end of 1993 based on compensation of more than $150,000 are protected. After 1994, the $150,000 limit will be indexed for inflation in $10,000 increments.

Plan amendments incorporating the $150,000 limit are not required to be in place before the end of the 1994 plan year. As long as it is adopted in a timely manner, the amendment may apply retroactively ret·ro·ac·tive  
adj.
Influencing or applying to a period prior to enactment: a retroactive pay increase.



[French rétroactif, from Latin
 even though it results in a reduction of some accrued benefits. The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  has provided model plan amendment language that satisfies the new requirements.

Because the reduced compensation limit has to be taken into account in calculating maximum deduction limits, it will result in delayed funding for some defined benefit pension plans. Moreover, because it must be reflected in applying the plan's benefit formula, future benefit accruals for employees earning more than $150,000 will be reduced. In recently proposed rules the Service has clarified how future defined benefit accruals will be affected by the "grandfathered" accrued benefit at the end of 1993 that may be based on compensation of more than $150,000. The IRS has provided three alternative methods for coordinating the 1993 grandfathered accrued benefit with future benefit accruals subject to the $150,000 limit. These are the same transition alternatives provided when the $200,000 limit took effect in 1989. In selecting the appropriate alternative, plan sponsors must weigh competing objectives, such as maximizing qualified plan benefits and administrative simplicity.

Additionally, future allocations under defined contribution plans Defined contribution plan

A pension plan whose sponsor is responsible only for making specified contributions into the plan on behalf of qualifying participants. Related: Defined benefit plan
 for employees earning more than $150,000 will be reduced because the limit will have to be taken into account in applying the plan contribution formula. In the past, simple profit-sharing plans could generate the maximum $30,000 annual allocation for employees earning more than $200,000. Because the maximum deductible contribution Deductible contribution

Amount paid into an IRA, an employer-sponsored retirement plan, or other type of retirement plan for a particular tax year that is a deduction from income for tax purposes.
 to a profit-sharing plan is limited to 15% of compensation up to $150,000, these arrangements will have to be modified to preserve maximum $30,000 allocations.

In determining deferral deferral - Waiting for quiet on the Ethernet.  amounts under Sec. 401(k) plans, employees will need to base deferral elections on no more than $150,000 of compensation. For example, in 1993, employees earning $235,840 or more could defer approximately 4% of compensation to reach the $8,994 limit. For 1994, those employees will have to defer approximately 6% of compensation to reach the same level. Because the reduced compensation limit has to be taken into account in applying the annual nondiscrimination tests, it will tend to further reduce deferral opportunities for highly compensated employees under Sec. 401(kl plans.

Many companies will continue to rely on unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements to restore benefits that can no longer be provided under qualified plans due to the reduced compensation limit.

From Jeff Davis Jeff Davis may refer to:
  • Jeff Davis (comedian) (born 1973)
  • Jeff Davis (horse), one of Ulysses S. Grant's horses in the American Civil War
  • Jeff Davis (football player), professional NFL football player, member of Clemson's 1981 national championship team
, J.D., Washington, D.C.
COPYRIGHT 1994 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1994, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Davis, Jeff
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Apr 1, 1994
Words:526
Previous Article:Statutorily mandated changes from cash to accrual.
Next Article:Application of Sec. 338 to S corporations. (Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Compensation considerations for qualified plan sponsors.
The real cost of nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Age-weighted profit-sharing plans may benefit small companies.(Brief Article)
New strategies for new laws. (employee benefits)
Small Business Job Protection Act adds simplicity (and complexity.)
Repeal of the family aggregation rules in defining HCEs in a qualified plan. (highly compensated employees)
Retirement plan limitations. (Fast Tax Facts 2002).(Brief Article)
New tax law significantly improves benefits of 401(k) and other qualified plans.
New section 409A: a revolution in the world of deferred compensation.
Reasonable shareholder-employee compensation.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles