Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,922 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Illinois appeals court upholds public nuisance claim in gun case.


In the first such ruling in the country, an Illinois appeals court has upheld public nuisance public nuisance n. a nuisance which affects numerous members of the public or the public at large, as distinguished from a nuisance which only does harm to a neighbor or a few private individuals.  claims filed by victims of gun violence against firearms This is an extensive list of small arms — pistol, machine gun, grenade launcher, anti-tank rifle — that includes variants.

: Top - 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

A
  • A-91 (Russia - Compact Assault Rifle - 5.
 manufacturers. (Young v. Bryco Arms, Nos. 1-01-0739, 1-01-0740, 1-01-0742, 2001 WL 1665427 (Ill. App. Ct. Dec. 31, 2001).)

"It's a stunning defeat of the gun industry," said Dennis Henigan, director of the Legal Action Project of the Brady Center to Prevent Handgun Violence. The defendant gunmakers have filed a petition for a rehearing rehearing n. conducting a hearing again based on the motion of one of the parties to a lawsuit, petition or criminal prosecution, usually by the court or agency which originally heard the matter. . The appellate decision encompasses three lawsuits consolidated for the purpose of the appeal.

The ruling allows plaintiffs to proceed against gun industry defendants on a common law theory of public nuisance, a claim often included in pollution cases. The theory could prove more successful for plaintiffs than past attempts to hold gunmakers accountable through negligence or products liability claims.

The plaintiffs, the surviving relatives of five victims fatally fa·tal·ly  
adv.
1. So as to cause death; mortally: fatally injured.

2. So as to result in disaster or ruin.

3. According to the decree of fate; inevitably.

Adv. 1.
 shot by juveniles with access to handguns, filed a public nuisance claim against 18 firearms manufacturers and distributors. Citing the accessibility of guns to juveniles in Chicago, they claimed that the industry's marketing and distribution tactics interfere with people's right to use the streets and other public places without fear and undue risk of injury. The defendants argued that public nuisance law does not apply to the lawful commercial distribution of a product.

But the appeals court ruled there was a basis for the plaintiffs' complaints to stand. "In our view, contrary to defendants' claims that they have no power to abate abate v. to do away with a problem, such as a public or private nuisance or some structure built contrary to public policy. This can include dikes which illegally direct water onto a neighbors property, high volume noise from a rock band or a factory, an improvement  the nuisance due to lack of control, the complaints connote con·note  
tr.v. con·not·ed, con·not·ing, con·notes
1. To suggest or imply in addition to literal meaning: "The term 'liberal arts' connotes a certain elevation above utilitarian concerns" 
 that defendants have the power to control the purposeful pur·pose·ful  
adj.
1. Having a purpose; intentional: a purposeful musician.

2. Having or manifesting purpose; determined: entered the room with a purposeful look.
 creation and maintenance of an illegal secondary market by oversupplying the areas around Chicago with handguns," the court wrote.

Plaintiff lawyer Jonathan Baum of Chicago denied that plaintiff advocates are trying to shut down the gun industry. "We want [manufacturers and distributors] to behave in a responsible fashion given the product they sell and what happens to that product," he said.
COPYRIGHT 2002 American Association for Justice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Magnuson, Carolyn
Publication:Trial
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Apr 1, 2002
Words:328
Previous Article:Can Congress beat the cloning clock?
Next Article:Sellers of `laundered lemons' forced to come clean.(Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.)(California)
Topics:



Related Articles
In re the Exxon Valdez Alaska Native Class v. Exxon Corp.: cultural resources, subsistence living, and the special injury rule.
California ruling creates new duty for gun manufacturers.
Litigating against gun manufacturers.
Gunning for justice: recent litigation has targeted the way firearms manufacturers design and distribute their products. Courts have upheld some...
Courts issue conflicting decisions in public-entity cases against gun industry.
City can sue gun makers under public-nuisance theory.
No special immunity. (Stateline).(gun industry law)(Brief Article)
Ninth Circuit lets crime victims sue gun makers.
New Jersey decision bolsters arguments for gun maker liability.
Rhode Island lead paint victory may be first of many, lawyers say.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles