Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,488,552 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Illegal conundrums.


NEW YORK, APRIL 11

DEMOCRATIC protocols get pretty elusive these days. In an attempt to sort it all out, we hovered for a moment on a wild idea. Why not send the illegals to France?

But delirious ideas have short lives, as they should have, and one seeks to learn from experience. We begin today by saying that, in France, the mobs don't exactly rule, but they seem to have a veto power. The utter capitulation of President Chirac disgraces him, his party, French democratic processes, and economic common sense. And, incidentally, it reminds us of the authority of the mob in French history, beginning with the inglorious revolution which even politicians of singularly independent dispositions--like Charles de Gaulle--feel the need to propitiate by public obeisances ("Vive la Revolution!") on ceremonial occasions. The mobs all but chased de Gaulle out of town in 1968, and they have shown us, in the past weeks, their continuing power to triumph over thoughtful republican procedures aimed at reforming retrograde French practices.

Over here, the mobs have not quite yet assumed power, though it is possible that they have paved the way to supremacy on the issue being currently debated, namely how to cope with the illegals.

It pays to give a little thought to the magnitude of the problem. Some demographers believe that the real figure for the illegal population is not 11 million, but 16 million. It is possible that the figure is somewhere in between, which raises the question: How're you going to get an accurate count, exactly? One recalls, in the final chapters of apartheid, thought given to how to figure out whether a South African human being was white or black or colored. The problem did not come to a bloody boil, because it was finally, wearily, decided that the best way to handle that vexed question was to declare that everybody who lived in South Africa was a South African.

By such reasoning, everybody who lives in America is an American. But of course that is to deal lightly with the authority of America, Inc., to decide who is and who is not, properly speaking, an American.

But since we are looking into practical questions, we must add the most urgent: First you identify the illegals--then you expel them?

But that is an enormous job. And fatefully complicated by the U.S. Constitution, which says that anyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen. How many of those 11-16 million illegals gave birth in U.S. hospitals (or for that matter, in U.S. parking lots): Is it proposed that we undertake to separate these mothers from their children?

We do not have the exact count involving Operation Keelhaul, but it is estimated as being in the vicinity of 2 million. That was the number of Russians whom we agreed, however reluctantly, to repatriate to their motherland in 1945, so that Josef Stalin could keep his gulags fully occupied.

But we--Americans and British--did it. It was, however, much easier than deporting the current illegals would be inasmuch as these wretched Russians seeking refuge were heavily concentrated in military and paramilitary centers, so we could stick them into trains heading east, and figure out some way to reconcile our consciences to what we had done.

But just to round up 11 million-plus illegals presents a logistical problem of the first magnitude. Who would undertake that job? How many sleuths would be required in order absolutely to establish that this person's papers are fraudulent, that other one's valid? The undertaking would be dismaying and, conceivably, an asymptotic killer.

We can't predict what kind of a bill the Senate will come in with, after staring on television at the crowds who pledge themselves to life in America. But the practical challenge of mass deportations has got to play a role in our deliberations. One practical reform which we do have the power to enact is to repeal the provision in the 14th Amendment which confers citizenship on anyone born on U.S. soil. And then, laws are everywhere required to take sterner measures against voting by noncitizens. If we are going to be ruled by the mob, the mob should not show up with phony credentials.

--UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:illegal immigrants and their succeeders
Author:Buckley, William F., Jr.
Publication:National Review
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 8, 2006
Words:709
Previous Article:Iran in our future.(nuclear aspects)
Next Article:Respectfully submitted.(letters to the editor)(Letter to the editor)
Topics:



Related Articles
Illegal means a lot. (illegal immigrants)(Immigration and American Politics)
Target practice.(Brief Article)
Immigration has its costs.(THE LAST WORD)
EDITORIAL WALL OF SHAME.(Editorial)(Editorial)
No left turn.(Americans want illegal immigration to stop)
RASHNESS MAY FOLLOW WALKOUT.(Viewpoint)
Double-edged message.(Editorials)(Immigration policy's failures on display)(Editorial)
Myth vs. fact: politicians and pundits are defending illegal immigration with worn-out myths that can easily be proven wrong.(IMMIGRATION)
The great immigration debate: there's general, agreement that America's immigration system needs fixing--but that's where the consensus...
IMMIGRATION RIGHTS RALLIES PLANNED CARDINAL ROGER MAHONY TO SPEAK ON ISSUE AS DEBATE CONTINUES.(News)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles