Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,557,847 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Ignoring Lawrence.


The U.S. Supreme Court was unambiguous in Lawrence v. Texas The Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S., 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003), striking down state Sodomy laws as applied to gays and lesbians. , its 6-3 decision in 2003 that struck down the nation's sodomy laws A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as sex crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but is typically understood by courts to include any sexual act which does not lead to procreation. . But at least two states are stubbornly refusing to conform.

In Kansas last year the state's second highest court pushed Lawrence aside to uphold a state law meting out different punishments for gay and straight sex. The court upheld the 17-year prison sentence imposed on Matthew Limon in 2000 for engaging in oral sex with a 14-year-old male when Limon was 18. The state's "Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet

star-crossed lovers die as teenagers. [Br. Lit.: Romeo and Juliet]

See : Death, Premature


Romeo and Juliet

archetypal star-crossed lovers. [Br. Lit.
" law sets the maximum penalty for straight teenagers at 15 months if they have sex with a minor within four years of their age. The court said that the 1,260% sentencing discrepancy was just fine, because Kansas had the right to punish gay sex with minors more harshly than the exact same sex acts performed by an opposite-sex teen. The American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), nonpartisan organization devoted to the preservation and extension of the basic rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution.  is now appealing the case to the Kansas supreme court The Kansas Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the state of Kansas based in Topeka. Composed of seven justices, led by Chief Justice Kay McFarland, the Court supervises the legal profession, administers over the judicial branch, and serves as the state court of last , where a decision is expected in September.

Meanwhile, Virginia attorney general Jerry W. Kilgore--who's running for governor on an antigay platform--is refusing to void that state's sodomy law, contending Virginia can still prosecute gay men who meet in public. Prosecutors are holding fast to the 2004 solicitation of sodomy sodomy

Noncoital carnal copulation. Sodomy is a crime in some jurisdictions. Some sodomy laws, particularly in Middle Eastern countries and those jurisdictions observing Shari'ah law, provide penalties as severe as life imprisonment for homosexual intercourse, even if the
 conviction of Joel Singson, claiming he intended to have sex in public and that Lawrence applies only to private sex. Singson, arrested after propositioning an undercover cop in a department store restroom, insists he intended to have sex in a private place; the police officer disagrees. The Virginia court of appeals is expected to hear oral arguments this fall.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Liberation Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EDUCATION; Lawrence v. Texas
Author:Han, Angie J.
Publication:The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5VA
Date:Aug 16, 2005
Words:273
Previous Article:Sex, lies, and teenagers: abstinence-only sex education erases the existence of GLBT youth and fills kids' heads with untruths. Some parents have had...
Next Article:Too sexy for saving lives? Right-wing politicians are targeting sexually frank HIV prevention programs and materials. But AIDS advocates aren't...
Topics:



Related Articles
Balance of justice: cultural advances, openly gay clerks, and speculation about the sexual orientation of one of their own have substantially changed...
Awaiting judgment day: Lawrence v. Texas could take out sodomy laws for good--or it could set a precedent for increased infringement of gay rights....
Sodomy and the Supremes: legal expert David J. Garrow counts the potential votes in the upcoming Supreme Court decision on sodomy laws. (Cover...
Will Bush weigh in on sodomy? (Supreme Court).(George W. Bush and the legal challenge of Texas v. Lawrence)(Brief Article)
Sodomy on trial: a divided U.S. Supreme Court gives little clue as to where it will fall on the legality of Texas's antigay sodomy law....
Reigning Supreme: the Supreme Court decision striking down state anti-sodomy laws seriously escalates the culture war--and grievously undermines our...
Courting immorality: contrary to the Supreme Court's revolutionary claim in Lawrence v. Texas, state governments have a compelling interest to...
Lawrence's immoral consequences.(Insider Report)(Brief Article)
Sodomy criminals no more: the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas may clear the records of those convicted under sodomy laws--including the...
Changing history: the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas took many people by surprise--but those who had been fighting antigay sodomy laws...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles