Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,470 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

IRS proposes removing filing requirement for small business ordinary loss claim.


In a move to eliminate the paperwork burden for small businesses, the Internal Revenue Service has proposed removing the requirement of filing an extra information statement when claiming an ordinary loss on small business stock.

Under existing regulations, a taxpayer claiming an ordinary loss on small business stock must file an information statement with the return for the year the loss occurs. Proposed rulemaking (CO-46-94) would permit an individual to treat a limited amount of loss on Internal Revenue Code The Internal Revenue Code is the body of law that codifies all federal tax laws, including income, estate, gift, excise, alcohol, tobacco, and employment taxes. These laws constitute title 26 of the U.S. Code (26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.  section 1244 stock as ordinary loss. A taxpayer still would bear the burden of proof that the deduction is proper. but the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  and the Treasury have determined that denying ordinary loss treatment under the section solely because a taxpayer fails to file the regulations section 1.1244(e)-1(b) information statement is not necessary to achieve the section's purposes.

Michael J. Knight, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , a partner of Michael J. Knight & Co., Fairfield, Connecticut Fairfield is a town located in Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States. It is situated along the Gold Coast of Connecticut. Fairfield is a town of many neighborhoods, two of which -- Southport and Greenfield Hill -- are notably affluent. , says the change is beneficial simply because it relieves complexity. "The burden of proof is still on the taxpayer, but individuals who know about 1244 and forget to include the attachment shouldn't be penalized pe·nal·ize  
tr.v. pe·nal·ized, pe·nal·iz·ing, pe·nal·iz·es
1. To subject to a penalty, especially for infringement of a law or official regulation. See Synonyms at punish.

2.
 to the extent of losing the deduction." The regulations are proposed to be effective for open taxable years Taxable year

The 12-month period an individual uses to report income for income tax purposes. For most individuals, their tax year is the calendar year.
 beginning after December 31, 1953, the effective date of the original section 1244 regulations.

For further information or to find out where to submit comments, call Kirsten L. Simpson at (202) 622-7790.
COPYRIGHT 1995 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jan 1, 1995
Words:238
Previous Article:U.S. Court of Appeals says accountants can be liable under securities law. (US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Worlds of Wonder Securities...
Next Article:Court, fed up with "circuit shopping," says IRS must pay fees. (Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Status report on IRS offset program.
Practice management implications of Circular 230 proposed regulations.
Is your refund claim adequate?
Sec. 1244 disclosure - a trap for the unwary.
Testimony before National Commission on Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service: November 8, 1996.(Transcript)
Proposed amendments to circular 230. (part 2) (tax consultant standards)
ERP systems and record retention.(enterprise resource planning)
Automatic tax-year-change procedures modified for C corporations. (Accounting Methods & Periods).
Will a tax opinion still prevent penalties?
TEI welcomes spring with a shower of technical activities: comments filed on 2004 Act, e-filing mandate, and auditor independence, withholding, and...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles