Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,536,717 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

IRS manual counsels attorneys on verdict and settlement taxes.


The IRS got the message from the media: Too many taxpayers were declaring their lawsuit proceeds nontaxable.

During a project in Alabama, the IRS found that "analyses of newspaper articles revealed that numerous lawsuits were being resolved ... for substantial amounts," according to a new guide for auditors. A subsequent project revealed that "the vast majority of these lawsuit verdicts and settlements were escaping taxation."

The IRS has a program that trains auditors by market segments, focusing, for example, on particular industries, professions, or issues. Each program includes a guide that contains audit examination techniques, common and unique industry issues, business practices, industry terminology, and other information.

After the IRS identified the lawsuit market segment, it released in January the Market Segment Specialization Program Audit Technique Guide for Lawsuit Awards and Settlements. (The guide is available online at http:/www.irs.gov/prod/bus_info/ mssp/index.html; click on "Lawsuit Awards and Settlements.")

Because a business entity cannot suffer a personal injury according to the Internal Revenue Code, the guide applies only to individual recoveries. It is designed to show auditors how to recognize taxable verdicts and settlements, but it can be a valuable resource for attorneys seeking to educate their clients about potential taxes on recoveries.

"This guide will provide information on how to identify tax returns with lawsuit payment issues, suggestions on conducting the examination, detail of issues, explanations of applicable terminology, synopses of several related court cases, and exhibits of pertinent forms," according to the guide's introduction.

Section 104(a)(2) of the tax code provides that, except for punitive damages, amounts that a plaintiff receives for a physical injury are excludable from his or her gross income. The IRS has held that punitive damages are not received for personal injuries and therefore cannot be excluded from gross income. In 1996, Congress amended the section so that punitive damages are not excludable from income, whether they are related to physical or nonphysical injuries. Congress also limited the amounts excludable for emotional distress to out-of-pocket medical costs in cases of nonphysical injuries.

The 10-chapter guide covers topics including taxability of lawsuit proceeds and payments; sources of information (including newspaper articles, courthouse research, computer data, settlement payers, state insurance departments, and state supreme court libraries); and Form 1099 reporting requirements. It also includes a synopsis of litigated cases.

In the case section, the guide cites "the clear guidance of Burke and Schleier"--respectively, a sex discrimination case that outlined the two-part test for excluding damages under [sections] 104(a)(2) and an age discrimination case that discussed both physical and nonphysical tort injuries. (United States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229 (1992) (finding that back pay received in settlement of Title VII claims was not excludable); Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995) (finding that payments received for age discrimination are taxable).)

These U.S. Supreme Court cases "contain our present authority for these types of cases," according to the guide, but it notes a number of other cases--including wrongful death, age and sex discrimination, employment, and insurance cases--that provide good discussion on defining torts and personal injuries.
COPYRIGHT 2001 American Association for Justice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Porter, Rebecca
Publication:Trial
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2001
Words:520
Previous Article:Courts diverge on third-party custody, visitation cases.
Next Article:Admiralty claim may proceed in state court, Supreme Court says.
Topics:



Related Articles
Tax Court specifies conditions for accepting settlement allocations.
Chicago Chapter's liaison meeting with Midwest Regional Appeals; February 15, 1995.(Liaison Meeting Special)
What Schleier and amended s. 104(a)(2) mean to your practice: tax considerations in pleadings and settlement agreements. (section 104(a)(2) of the...
Tax Court mediation: a case study.
Guidance on prohibition of ex parte communications.(IRS guidance)
Notice 99-50: ex parte communications.(IRS Notice 99-50)
Contingent fee awards - a different approach.
Class actions and the attorneys' fees conundrum.
High court to review taxes on attorney fees.
Should taxes be included in damage calculations?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles