Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,857 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

IRS issues guidance on determining wagering gains and losses.


The Office of Chief Counsel issued a memorandum explaining how to determine the wagering wa·ger  
n.
1.
a. An agreement under which each bettor pledges a certain amount to the other depending on the outcome of an unsettled matter.

b. A matter bet on; a gamble.

2.
 gains and losses of casual gamblers.

Scenario

In the scenario in the memorandum, the taxpayer is a casual gambler on a fixed income. Therefore, she carefully limits the amount of money she gambles. Her practice is to commit only $100 to slot machine play on any visit to a casino, playing until she loses the original $100 committed to gambling or until she stops gambling and cashes out.

The taxpayer went to a casino to play the slot machines on 10 separate occasions throughout the year. On each visit to the casino, the taxpayer exchanged $100 of cash for $100 in slot machine tokens and used the tokens to gamble. On five occasions, the taxpayer lost her entire $100 in tokens before terminating play. On the other five occasions, the taxpayer redeemed her remaining tokens for the following amounts of cash: $20, $70, $150, $200, and $300.

Applicable Law

Sec. 165(d) states that "losses from wagering transactions shall be allowed only to the extent of the gains from such transactions" but does not provide a technical definition of the terms "gains" and "losses." However, if the statute's language is plain, clear, and unambiguous, the statutory language is to be applied according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 its terms, unless a literal interpretation Noun 1. literal interpretation - an interpretation based on the exact wording
interpretation - an explanation that results from interpreting something; "the report included his interpretation of the forensic evidence"
 of the statutory language would lead to absurd results. In ordinary parlance Parlance - A concurrent language.

["Parallel Processing Structures: Languages, Schedules, and Performance Results", P.F. Reynolds, PhD Thesis, UT Austin 1979].
, a wagering "gain" means the amount won in excess of the amount bet (basis). Therefore, a wagering gain is the total winnings less the amount of the wager and a wagering loss is the amount of the wager (basis) lost.

Casual gamblers may deduct their wagering losses only to the extent of their wagering gains; they may not carry over excess wagering losses to offset wagering gains in another tax year or offset non-wagering income. In addition, casual gamblers may not net their gains and losses from slot machine play throughout the year and report only the net amount for the year.

As the memorandum explains, the term "transactions" in Sec. 165(d) could mean every single play in a game of chance or every wager made. This interpretation would require a taxpayer to (1) calculate the gain or loss on every transaction separately and treat every play or wager as a taxable event Taxable event

An event or transaction that has a tax consequence, such as the sale of stock holding that is subject to capital gains taxes.
 and (2) trace and recompute the basis through all transactions to calculate the result of each play or wager. However, as the memorandum points out, courts considering that reading have found it unduly burdensome and unreasonable. Furthermore, the use of the plural PLURAL. A term used in grammar, which signifies more than one.
     2. Sometimes, however, it may be so expressed that it means only one, as, if a man were to devise to another all he was worth, if he, the testator, died without children, and he died leaving one
 term "transactions" in the statute implies that gain or loss may be calculated over a series of separate plays or wagers WAGERS. A wager is a bet a contract by which two parties or more agree that a certain sum of money, or other thing, shall be paid or delivered to one of them, on the happening or not happening of an uncertain event.
     2. The law does not prohibit all wagers.
.

According to the memorandum, the better interpretation of wagering transactions is that a casual gambler recognizes a wagering gain or loss at the time he or she redeems his or her tokens. Based on Glenshaw Glass, 348 U.S. 426 (1955), the Office of Chief Counsel believes that the fluctuating wins and losses left in play are not accessions to wealth until the taxpayer redeems his or her tokens and can definitively calculate the amount above or below basis (the wager) realized. Under this view, a taxpayer who goes to a casino and purchases tokens bases his or her gain or loss for that visit on the amount received when cashing in his or her tokens at the end of play, regardless of the aggregate amount of the taxpayer's separate wins and losses during the entire visit.

Calculating the Taxpayer's Gains and Losses

Based on the principles for determining wagering gains and losses discussed above, the taxpayer in the memorandum scenario had gains and losses for the tax year as shown in the exhibit. The taxpayer must report the $350 of wagering gains as gross income under Sec. 61. However, under Sec. 165(d), the taxpayer may deduct only $350 of the $610 wagering losses. The taxpayer may not carry over the excess wagering losses to offset wagering gains in another tax year or offset nonwagering income.

A casual gambler who elects to itemize To individually state each item or article.

Frequently used in tax accounting, an itemized account or claim separately lists amounts that add up to the final sum of the total account on claim.
 deductions may deduct wagering losses, up to wagering gains, on Form 1040, Schedule A. In this case, the taxpayer may deduct only $350 of her $610 of wagering losses as an itemized deduction Itemized Deduction

A deduction from a taxpayer's taxable adjusted gross income that is made up of deductions for money spent on certain goods and services throughout the year.
. A casual gambler who takes the standard deduction The name given to a fixed amount of money that may be subtracted from the adjusted gross income of a taxpayer who does not itemize certain living expenses for Income Tax purposes.  rather than electing to itemize may not deduct any wagering losses.

Reflections

In this memorandum, the Office of Chief Counsel has taken a common-sense approach to this issue. Although the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  could arguably ar·gu·a·ble  
adj.
1. Open to argument: an arguable question, still unresolved.

2. That can be argued plausibly; defensible in argument: three arguable points of law.
 require a casual gambler to track wins and losses separately for each wager made, there is no compelling reason for requiring such a detailed accounting of the gambler's activity, and the requirement would be so burdensome that there would be no realistic possibility that any gambler would comply.

Office of Chief Counsel Memorandum AM 2008-011

James Beavers, J.D., LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) ., CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000.  
Exhibit: Taxpayer's wagering gains and losses

       $1 tokens   Tokens   Wagering  Wagering
Visit   bought    redeemed    gain      loss

  1       100         0         0       100
  2       100         0         0       100
  3       100         0         0       100
  4       100         0         0       100
  5       100         0         0       100
  6       100        20         0        80
  7       100        70         0        30
  8       100       150        50         0
  9       100       200       100         0
 10       100       300       200         0
Total    1000       740       350       610
COPYRIGHT 2009 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Beavers, James
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Feb 1, 2009
Words:893
Previous Article:IRS issues final regulations on sec. 6694 tax return preparer penalties.
Next Article:AICPA asks court to nullify tax patents.(AICPA ACTIVITIES)
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles