IRAQ - Why Is The US Less Safe.

Of Many writers about the US-led war on global terrorism, Daniel Benjamin, co-author of "The Next Attack: The Failure of the War on Terror and a Strategy for Getting It Right, to be published this autumn, on July 10 wrote: "as the trail of bodies that began with the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 continues to lengthen, we need to ask why the attacks keep coming. One key reason is that Osama Bin Laden's 'achievements' in standing up to the American colossus" on 9/11 "have inspired others to follow his lead. Another is that American actions - above all, the invasion and occupation of Iraq - have galvanized still more Muslims and convinced them of the truth of Bin Laden's vision".

The conflict between Salafi Islam and the West, "like all ideological struggles", Benjamin said, "is about competing stories". He added: "The audience is the global community of Muslims. America portrays itself as a benign and tolerant force which, with its Western partners, holds the keys to progress and prosperity. Radical [Salafi] Islamists declare that the universe is governed by a war between believers and World Infidelity, which comes as an intruder into the realm of Islam wearing various masks: secularism, Zionism, capitalism, globalization. World Infidelity, they argue, is determined to occupy Muslim lands, usurp Muslims' wealth and destroy Islam. Invading Iraq, however noble the US believed its intentions, provided the best possible confirmation of the jihadist claims and spurred many of Europe's alienated Muslims to adopt the Islamist cause as their own. The evidence is available in the elaborate underground railroad which has brought hundreds of European Muslims to the fight in Iraq. And the notion that the West would enhance its security by occupying Iraq has proved utterly illusory. Coalition forces in Iraq face daily attacks from jihadists not because Saddam Hussein had trained a cadre of terrorists - we know there was no pre-existing relationship between Baghdad and Al-Qaeda - but because the US invasion brought the targets into the proximity of the killers".

Those who bombed the Madrid commuter lines in March 2004, Benjamin wrote, "were obsessed with Iraq". They "delighted in the videotape that showed Iraqis rejoicing alongside the bodies of seven Spanish intelligence agents who were killed outside Baghdad" in November 2003; "they spoke of the need to punish Spain (their adoptive country) for supporting America; they recruited others to fight in the insurgency. They began work on their plot the day after hearing an audiotaped Bin Laden threaten 'all the countries which participate in this unjust war [in Iraq] - especially Britain, Spain, Australia, Poland, Japan and Italy'. It had been the first time Spain had been mentioned in an Al-Qaeda hit list. We may learn that the London bombers were, like the Madrid crew, a bunch of self-starter terrorists with few or no ties to Bin Laden... We may also learn that the killers belong to a network being built by...[Abu Mus'ab Al-] Zarqawi, who has emerged in Iraq as Bin Laden's heir apparent".

Salafi Muslims from Britain, France, Germany and elsewhere - along with several thousand from Arab countries - have travelled to Iraq to fight in what has become a theater of inspiration for the jihadi drama of faith. A handful are known to have trickled back to Europe already. Western intelligence services fear that more are on the way and will pose a bigger danger than the returnees from Afghanistan in the 1980s and 1990s, the global jihad's first generation of terrorists.

The anxiety in the West is justified: the fighters in Iraq are, as the CIA has observed, getting better on-the-job training than was available in Al-Qaeda's camps in Afghanistan. Britain has been on Al-Qaeda's target list since the group's earliest days in the 1990s; the country's appointment with terror was ensured. But now, because of the invasion of Iraq, it faces a longer and bloodier confrontation with radical Salafi Islam, as does the US.

America has shown itself to be good at hunting terrorists. But Benjamin concluded: "Unfortunately, by occupying Iraq, it has become even better at creating them".