IRAQ - No Way Out?Here are extracts from an article by David Ignatius David R. Ignatius (born May 26, 1950), an American journalist and novelist. He is currently an associate editor and columnist for the Washington Post. He also co-hosts PostGlobal, an online discussion of international issues at Washingtonpost. published on Sept. 28 by The Daily Star of Beirut: "...Some extreme [US] war critics are so angry at Bush they seem almost eager for America to lose, to prove a political point. Even among mainstream Democrats, the focus is 'gotcha!' rather than 'what next?' That is understandable, given the partisanship of Republican attacks, but it isn't right.... "How can America prevent Iraq from becoming a new safe haven 1. Designated area(s) to which noncombatants of the United States Government's responsibility and commercial vehicles and materiel may be evacuated during a domestic or other valid emergency. 2. where the newly hatched terrorists will plan for 9/11-scale attacks that could kill thousands of Americans? How do we re-stabilize a Middle East that today is dangerously unbalanced because of America's blunders in Iraq? This should be the Democrats' moment, if they can translate the national anger over Iraq into a coherent strategy for the future. But with a few notable exceptions, the Democrats are mostly ducking the hard question of what to do next. They act as if all those America-hating terrorists will evaporate back into the sands of Anbar province if America pulls out its troops. Alas, that is not the case. "That is the problem with Iraq - it is not an easy mistake to fix. An example of the Democrats' fudge on Iraq was highlighted this week by Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank Dana T. Milbank (born 27 April, 1968) is an American political reporter for The Washington Post. He is a graduate of Yale University, where he was a member of Trumbull College and the secretive society Skull and Bones. in his description of retired Major General John Batiste's appearance before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee. They cheered Batiste's evisceration evisceration /evis·cer·a·tion/ (e-vis?er-a´shun) 1. removal of the abdominal viscera. 2. removal of the contents of the eyeball, leaving the sclera. e·vis·cer·a·tion n. of Defense Secretary...Rumsfeld, but tuned out Batiste's call for more troops and more patience in Iraq, and his admonition Any formal verbal statement made during a trial by a judge to advise and caution the jury on their duty as jurors, on the admissibility or nonadmissibility of evidence, or on the purpose for which any evidence admitted may be considered by them. : 'We must mobilize our country for a protracted pro·tract tr.v. pro·tract·ed, pro·tract·ing, pro·tracts 1. To draw out or lengthen in time; prolong: disputants who needlessly protracted the negotiations. 2. challenge'. Here's a reality check for the Democrats: There is not a single country in the Middle East, with the possible exception of Iran, which favors a rapid American pullout pull·out n. 1. A withdrawal, especially of troops. 2. Change from a dive to level flight. Used of an aircraft. 3. An object designed to be pulled out. Noun 1. from Iraq. Why? "The consensus in the region is that a retreat now would have disastrous consequences for America and its allies. Yet withdrawal is the Iraq strategy you hear from most congressional Democrats, whether they call it 'strategic redeployment' or something else. I wish Democrats (and Republicans, for that matter) were asking this question: How do we prevent Iraq from becoming a failed state? "Many critics of the war would argue that the worst has already happened - Iraq has already unraveled. Unfortunately, as bad as things are, they could get considerably worse. Following a rapid American pullout, Iraq could descend into a full-blown civil war, with the Sunni-Shi'ite violence spreading outward throughout the region. In this chaos, oil supplies could be threatened, sending the price of oil well above $100 a barrel. Turkey, Iran and Jordan would intervene to protect their interests. "James Fallows titled his collection of prescient pre·scient adj. 1. Of or relating to prescience. 2. Possessing prescience. [French, from Old French, from Latin praesci essays warning about the Iraq war 'Blind into Baghdad'. We shouldn't compound the error by being 'blind out of Baghdad', too. "The Democrat who has tried hardest to think through these problems is Senator Joseph Biden. He argues that the current government of national unity isn't succeeding in holding Iraq together, and that America should instead embrace a policy of 'federalism plus' that will devolve devolve v. when property is automatically transferred from one party to another by operation of law, without any act required of either past or present owner. The most common example is passing of title to the natural heir of a person upon his death. power to the Shi'ite, Sunni and Kurdish regions. Iraqis are already voting for sectarian solutions, Biden argues, and America won't stabilize Iraq unless it aligns its policy with this reality. I disagree with some of the senator's conclusions, but he's asking the right question: How do we fix Iraq? America needs to reckon with to settle accounts or claims with; - used literally or figuratively. to include as a factor in one's plans or calculations; to anticipate. to deal with; to handle; as, I have to reckon with raising three children as well as doing my job s>. See also: Reckon Reckon Reckon the message of the National Intelligence Estimate. Iraq has compounded Muslim rage and created a genuinely dangerous crisis for the United States. "The Democrats understandably want to treat Iraq as George W. Bush's war and wash their hands of it. But the damage of Iraq can be mitigated only if it again becomes the nation's war - with the whole country invested in finding a way out of the morass that doesn't leave us permanently in greater peril. If the Democrats could lead that kind of debate about security, they would become the nation's governing party. But what you hear from most Democrats these days is: Gotcha (jargon, programming) gotcha - A misfeature of a system, especially a programming language or environment, that tends to breed bugs or mistakes because it both enticingly easy to invoke and completely unexpected and/or unreasonable in its outcome. ". |
|
|||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion