IFAC issues proposal to revise independence standards; CPAs encouraged to comment.On Dec. 29, 2006, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, an independent standard-setting board within the International Federation of Accountants, released an exposure draft containing significant revisions to the independence standards of the IFAC IFAC - Institut de La Fondation d'Acupuncture du Canada (Acupuncture Foundation of Canada Institute) IFAC - International Federation of Accountants IFAC - International Federation of Automatic Control IFAC - International Folk Alliance Conference IFAC - Irvine Fine Arts Center (California) Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the IFAC Code). As a member body of IFAC, the AICPA considers all proposed revisions to the IFAC Code and determines what revisions, if any, may be appropriate to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct to harmonize international standards. A number of revisions being proposed to the IFAC Code are more restrictive than those of the AICPA. Accordingly, they may have a significant impact on AICPA members if adopted by the Institute. AICPA members are encouraged to review this important proposal. Comments are due to IFAC by Apr. 30. Significant revisions to the IFAC Code include: * Extending the more restrictive listed entity independence requirements to the audits of entities of significant public interest. The proposal would extend the listed entity independence provisions (e.g., partner rotation, cooling-off period Cooling-off period The period of time between the filing of a preliminary prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the actual public offering of the securities., non-audit services restrictions) to all entities of significant public interest. Such entities are described in the proposal as listed entities and certain other entities which, because of their business, size or number of employees, have a large number and wide range of stakeholders. While the proposal allows some flexibility for each member body to determine which entities should be considered to be entities of significant public interest for purposes of their particular jurisdiction, there is a presumption that regulated financial institutions would be entities of significant public interest, and depending on the facts and circumstances, such entities may include pension funds, government agencies, government-controlled entities and not-for-profit entities. * Expanding the applicability of partner rotation requirements and removal of the provision that allows flexibility for small firms to apply alternative safeguards. Under the proposal, the partner rotation requirements would apply to all entities of significant public interest and be expanded to cover all key audit partners (defined in the exposure draft). The revised standard would also remove the existing flexibility that permits firms with a limited number of partners to apply other safeguards, instead of partner rotation, to address the familiarity threat. The proposal is therefore more restrictive than the Securities and Exchange Commission's partner rotation requirement that provides an exception for audit firms with fewer than five audit clients that are issuers and fewer than 10 partners. * Strengthening guidance related to the provision of non-assurance services, including new guidance on the provision of tax services to audit clients. For example, the proposal states that performing certain tax services may create threats to independence and contains guidance on the following four broad categories of taxation services: tax return preparation; preparation of tax calculations; tax planning and other tax advisory services; and assistance in the resolution of tax disputes. The exposure draft can be accessed at: [website] www.ifac.org/Guidance/EXD EXD - Executive Director EXD - External Device-Outstanding.php |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion