Hydro saga continues.Ontario Hydro Ontario Hydro was the official name from 1974 of the Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario which was established in 1906 by the provincial Power Commission Act to build transmission lines to supply municipal utilities with electricity generated by private companies was built on the concept of providing power at cost to the people and industries of this province. This combination has fuelled the engine of the Ontario economy for over a century, and helped make it the most prosperous province in the country. Environmental concerns, inflationary pressures, government changes, and a host of other factors prompted a re-evaluation and a policy change. Ontario Hydro was split into separate business units and eventually started moving towards privatization privatization: see nationalization. privatization Transfer of government services or assets to the private sector. State-owned assets may be sold to private owners, or statutory restrictions on competition between privately and publicly owned . The deregulation Deregulation The reduction or elimination of government power in a particular industry, usually enacted to create more competition within the industry. Notes: Traditional areas that have been deregulated are the telephone and airline industries. of the electricity market was part and parcel of the previous provincial government's plan to privatize what it once was--a monopoly. This change was not only driven by the government's philosophy towards privatization, but also by the thinking that permeates large sector industries and that has led to deregulation in the whole field of energy (oil and gas industries). This thinking is based on the premise that competition and market forces alone will maintain a balance between supply and demand and produce efficiencies sufficient to provide a reasonable rate of return to investors while maintaining competitive rates to consumers and industry. While this ideology sounds great in theory, the reality is quite different. To dispel the notion of a well-balanced free energy market environment, it is sufficient to point out to the skyrocketing cost of natural gas and gasoline all over North America North America, third largest continent (1990 est. pop. 365,000,000), c.9,400,000 sq mi (24,346,000 sq km), the northern of the two continents of the Western Hemisphere. , and price fixing price fixing n. a criminal violation of federal anti-trust statutes, in which several competing businesses reach a secret agreement (conspiracy) to set prices for their products to prevent real competition and keep the public from benefiting from price competition. in the Hydro market in California just a few years ago that almost bankrupted one of the richest American States. The former provincial government found out the hard way that such a move was full of dangers for both the consumer and the economy (not to mention their own political future), and froze the rates once prices went through the roof right after deregulation was implemented. The new provincial government seems to have learned only part of the lesson, and in its eagerness to appeal to the environmentalist environmentalist a person with an interest and knowledge about the interaction of humans and animals with the environment. minded voters promised to shut down the coal-fired generating plants by 2007. As a former budget co-ordinator for Ontario Hydro Northwestern Ontario Northwestern Ontario is the region within the Canadian province of Ontario which lies north and west of Lake Superior, and west of Hudson Bay and James Bay. It includes most of subarctic Ontario. Region from 1987 to 1995, I watched a sequence of provincial governments (Liberal, NDP NDP New Democratic Party (Canada) NDP National Development Plan (Republic of Ireland) NDP National Development Plan NDP National Democratic Party (Barbados) , Conservative, and now Liberal again) take this Crown corporation from the stated objective of power at cost, to an instrument of social policy, to full deregulation, and to a mix of private-public utility. Each new vision supposedly implemented to correct the flows of the previous one. The most recent based on the premise that a mix of regulated and free-market prices will provide the best protection for the consumer. So, what does this mean for the average consumer and business who wants nothing more than a stable and fair pricing structure? According to a market surveillance report by the Independent Electricity Market Operators (IMO "In my opinion." See IMHO and digispeak. IMO - IMHO ), Ontario's electricity system is facing insufficient capacity and ability to supply power at a time of growing demand. If this situation is not corrected quickly, "Ontario could be facing even more serious reliability problems in the near future, leading to the possibility of supply interruptions and continued upward pressure on prices during periods of peak demand." In other words Adv. 1. in other words - otherwise stated; "in other words, we are broke" put differently , a California-style mess all over again. Is anyone surprised? Didn't we know this last year? And they want to shut down fossil fuel generation that provides 26 per cent of the total supply in Ontario? What will that do to prices? [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] While the debate on whether Ontario Hydro should remain completely in public hands or move towards privatization will continue, the mix of supply and demand, as well as other global changes will be shaping electricity and energy markets for years to come. The way this province and region respond to such events will also have serious implications for our economic wellbeing. Frank Pullia is a certified management accountant You can assist by [ editing it] now. , Principal of Pullia Accounting & Consulting, and a former city councillor. (frank@frankpullia.com) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion