Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,650 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Human spaceflight program needs additional $30 billion, panel finds: Augustine committee recommends two exploration plans.


NASA's program to send astronauts back to the moon and on to Mars won't get off the ground unless the federal budget for human spaceflight is ramped up by $30 billion over the next 10 years. That's one of the conclusions of a panel commissioned by President Obama to review U.S. human spaceflight activities. The White House released an executive summary of the committee's report on September 8.

Critics have charged that the initiative to send astronauts back to the moon, a plan which President George W. Bush began five years ago, has never had sufficient funding. The independent panel, headed by Norman Augustine, retired chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp., now agrees, saying that without more money human exploration can't continue in "any meaningful way."

Alan Stern, who stepped down last year as NASA's associate administrator for science, says, "The frankness of this report was refreshing."

Over the next 10 years, NASA plans to spend about $108 billion to send astronauts back to the moon by 2020. The committee says an additional $30 billion is needed over that time frame. That increase would allow one of two possible exploration programs recommended by the panel. The first would adhere to the path outlined by President Bush, to explore exclusively the moon in preparation for landing on Mars. The second possibility would be for astronauts to visit sites in space other than the moon before going to Mars.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The idea that we could circumnavigate Mars for an additional $30 billion is "enticing" and harks back to human spaceflight strategies first proposed in the 1990s--but for a cheaper sticker price, says Howard McCurdy, a public policy expert at American University in Washington, D.C.

Currently, NASA relies on its fleet of space shuttles to send astronauts into space. However, to save money, NASA plans to retire the fleet at the end of 2010 or the beginning of 2011. A small crew exploration vehicle is in development.

With the consultation of independent experts, the committee finds that such a crew vehicle won't be ready to take people into space for at least seven years after the shuttles are retired. That's two years more than NASA had estimated.

"There has not been this long a gap in U.S. human launch capability since the U.S. human space program began," the committee notes in its summary. "The only way to significantly close the gap is to extend the life of the shuttle program" beyond 2010, the committee writes.

COPYRIGHT 2009 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Science & Society
Author:Cowen, Ron
Publication:Science News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 10, 2009
Words:418
Previous Article:Rock solid planet.(Atom & Cosmos)(Brief article)
Next Article:Reviewers prefer positive findings: journals may be less likely to publish equivocal studies.(Science & Society)(Brief article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Obama should make timetable for human mission to Mars, says report.
United States: Blue ribbon panel begins work on NASA review.
An America in Need of Human Spaceflight.
United States: Budget Woes Could End NASA s Space Exploration Plans.
Astronauts could orbit Mars in 2020s, provided NASA's budget is boosted.
United States: NASA Needs Extra $3 Billion a Year to Explore Space, Panel Says.
NASA panel: U.S. human spaceflight at funding crossroads.(News)
United States: NASA needs funding boost to fulfill goals.
NASA counts down for Mars rocket test.
UNited States : House Members Display Bipartisan Support For Human Spaceflight.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles