Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,581,301 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Hughes v. Slade.


U.S. District Court

CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED

Hughes v. Slade, 347 F.Supp.2d 821 (C.D.Cal. 2004). A prisoner convicted for attempted extortion petitioned for habeas corpus habeas corpus (hā`bēəs kôr`pəs) [Lat.,=you should have the body], writ directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time to a  relief, challenging the denial of sentence credit for time served in a Mexican jail while awaiting extradition to the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. . The district court granted the petition, finding that the prisoner was entitled to credit for time served in the Mexican jail. The court held that the prisoner was not required to have been exclusively in on federal charges relating to relating to relate prepconcernant

relating to relate prepbezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc 
 his sentence for extortion in order to be eligible for sentence credit. (Federal Correctional Institute, Victorville, California Victorville is a city located in the Victor Valley of western San Bernardino County, California, USA. According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2000 census, the city has a total population of 64,029. )
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HABEAS CORPUS
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:108
Previous Article:Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)
Next Article:Jackson v. Ashcroft.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
Hughes v. Slade.(habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Gamble v. Calbone.(habeas corpus case)(Brief Article)
Gamble v. Calbone.(HABEAS CORPUS)(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Colton v. Ashcroft.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Kane v. Winn.(prisoner files petition for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Kane v. Winn.(federal prisoner alleges violation of Bureau of Prisons regulations and inadequate medical care)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)
Thomas v. Barker.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles