Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,758,148 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

House leader Tom DeLay attacks church-state separation.


A top official of the U.S. House of Representatives claimed in early March that the First Amendment does not call for the separation of church and state
See also: .
Separation of church and state is a political and legal doctrine which states that government and religious institutions are to be kept separate and independent of one another.
.

The day before the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in cases involving public display of the Ten Commandments Ten Commandments or Decalogue [Gr.,=ten words], in the Bible, the summary of divine law given by God to Moses on Mt. Sinai. They have a paramount place in the ethical system in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. , House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) said he hoped the high court would finally recognize that church-state separation is not called for within the Constitution.

"I hope the Supreme Court will finally read the Constitution and see there's no such thing, or no mention, of separation of church and state in the Constitution," said DeLay.

The Supreme Court on March 2 heard disputes from Texas and Kentucky dealing with Commandments displays. Americans United for Separation of Church and State Americans United for Separation of Church and State (Americans United or AU for short) is a religious freedom advocacy group in the United States which promotes the separation of church and state, a legal doctrine seen by the AU as being enshrined in the Establishment  filed friend-of-the-court briefs in both cases, Van Orden v. Perry Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, involving whether a government-sponsored display of the Ten Commandments at the Texas State Capitol in Austin violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.  and McCreary County v. ACLU ACLU: see American Civil Liberties Union. , arguing that the First Amendment requires a separation of church and state.

Founding Fathers Thomas Jefferson and James Madison explained on different occasions that the First Amendment was intended to maintain a division between religion and government.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:In The Capital
Publication:Church & State
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:179
Previous Article:Politics and proof-texts: why I disagree with Jim Dobson and Jim Wallis.(Perspective)
Next Article:AmeriCorps aid to religious schools upheld.(In The Capital)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Istook amendment revised to mollify religious groups, introduced in House.
New Year: old problems. (church-state separation issues)
Forecast for Congress: stormy weather ahead.(Editorial)
HOUSE OF HORRORS.
CLEVELAND ROCKS!
In times of trouble, the watchdogs must bark even louder. (Perspective).(Brief Article)
Legacy of freedom: Jefferson, Madison and the nation's founders left us church-state separation. Can we keep it? (Special Book Excerpt).
DeLay congressional plan targets church-state separation.(In The Capital)(Brief Article)
'Under God' at the high court: pledge plaintiff Newdow argues well, but the justices seem unreceptive.
On the wrong path: church and state after two centuries.(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles