Homosexual activism threatens freedom of speech.I'm ruling last December on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage Noun 1. same-sex marriage - two people of the same sex who live together as a family; "the legal status of same-sex marriages has been hotly debated" couple, twosome, duet, duo - a pair who associate with one another; "the engaged couple"; "an inseparable , the Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1] claimed that the protection of freedom of religion afforded by s. 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (also known as The Charter of Rights and Freedoms or simply The Charter) is a bill of rights entrenched in the Constitution of Canada. It forms the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982. "is broad and jealously guarded in our Charter jurisprudence." If that is so, how can it be that Canada's human rights thought-police are harassing Catholic Bishop Fred Henry of Calgary and Protestant activist Bill Whatcott Bill Whatcott is a Canadian social conservative activist who campaigns against homosexuality and abortion. The dramatic nature of his activities have attracted attention from the media, including an appearance on The Daily Show. He has also run for political office. of Regina for nothing other than the honest expression of their Christian faith? Bishop Henry has come under fire for upholding the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality in a pastoral letter denouncing the Martin government's bill on same-sex marriage. Citing this letter as evidence, Carol Johnson of Calgary has accused the bishop of expressing views that are "likely to expose homosexuals to hatred or contempt" contrary to s. 3 of the Alberta Human Rights Code. Marie Riddle, the director of the Alberta Human Rights Commission, could have summarily dismissed this complaint on the ground that the bishop has an undeniable right to express his views on same-sex marriage. Instead, she has advised that the Commission could take a year to decide on summoning Bishop Henry before a human rights panel to answer to the complaint occasioned by his pastoral letter. Meanwhile, Bill Whatcott has been embroiled em·broil tr.v. em·broiled, em·broil·ing, em·broils 1. To involve in argument, contention, or hostile actions: "Avoid . . . with the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal over the views he expressed on homosexuality in a series of flyers that he and other members of a group known as The Christian Truth Activists distributed in Regina and Saskatoon Saskatoon (săskət n`), city (1991 pop. 186,058), S central Sask., Canada, on the South Saskatchewan River. between
September 2001 and April 2002. On May 5, the chairman of the Tribunal,
Prince Albert lawyer Anil Pandila, ruled that, in publishing these
flyers, Whatcott had violated the ban in s. 14(1) of the Saskatchewan
Human Rights Code on the publication and distribution of anything that
promotes hatred, ridicules, belittles, or otherwise affronts the dignity
of any person on the basis of sexual orientation sexual orientationn. The direction of one's sexual interest toward members of the same, opposite, or both sexes, especially a direction seen to be dictated by physiologic rather than sociologic forces. . In support of this finding, Pandila noted that Whatcott's flyers included statements like the following: "Sodomites Sodomites insisted on having sexual intercourse with angels disguised as men. [O.T.: Gen. 19] See : Homosexuality are 430 times more likely to acquire AIDS and 3 times more likely to sexually abuse children!" "Born Gay? No Way! Homosexual sex is about risky and addictive behaviour!" In testimony before the Tribunal, Whatcott defended these statements as truthful, citing as authority Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, a former lecturer in psychiatry at Yale University and an internationally renowned expert on homosexuality. Whatcott also told Pandila that he harbours no ill-will for homosexuals. He testified that he used to engage in homosexual acts, that the Lord had set him free, and that he is eager to help other homosexuals enjoy that same freedom. Pandila rejected all of these arguments. Drawing upon precedents set by the Supreme Court of Canada, he held that the intentions of Whatcott in spreading the flyers were irrelevant; that the truthfulness of statements in the flyers was irrelevant; and that the guarantee of "freedom of conscience and religion" in s. 2 (a) of the Charter does not give anyone the right to express religious convictions that expose homosexuals to hatred, ridicule, or contempt. All Christians should take note. In numerous cases like Whatcott's, human rights tribunals and the courts have made clear that, in their opinion, the equality rights of homosexuals in human rights codes and s. 15 of the Charter trump the ostensible Apparent; visible; exhibited. Ostensible authority is power that a principal, either by design or through the absence of ordinary care, permits others to believe his or her agent possesses. guarantees of freedom of religion in the laws and the Constitution of Canada The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law in Canada; the country's constitution is an amalgam of codified acts and uncodified traditions and conventions. It outlines Canada's system of government, as well as the civil rights of all Canadian citizens. . Thanks to these judicial rulings, Canadians no longer have a legal right to make a public statement that is liable to expose homosexuals to hatred or contempt, even if the statement is true and reflects the Christian convictions of the speaker. As for Whatcott, Pandila has ordered him to cease distributing his flyers and to pay $17,500 in damages to four homosexual complainants. Whatcott has refused to comply. On the weekend of May 13-14, he and some fellow Christian Truth Activists defied the Tribunal by distributing 1,000 more flyers in Saskatoon entitled "Sodomites and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission." Whatcott is on a course for jail as a Christian prisoner of conscience Prisoner of conscience (POC) is a term coined by the human rights pressure group Amnesty International in the early 1960s. It can refer to anyone imprisoned because of their race, religion, color, language, sexual orientation, or belief, so long as they have not used or advocated . Bishop Henry's fate is less certain. It seems that human rights tribunals and the courts prefer to go after the little guys first. Rory Leishman is a national affairs columnist for the London Free Press The London Free Press is a daily newspaper based in London, Ontario, Canada. The London Free Press began as the Canadian Free Press, founded by William Sutherland in 1847. It first began printing as a weekly newspaper in 1849. in London, Ontario. His homepage is www.roryleishman.com |
|
||||||||||||||||||

n`)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion