Printer Friendly
The Free Library
6,672,335 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Home builders support NAFTA's lumber ruling.


The nation's home builders have called on the Bush administration to rescind punishing tariffs on Canadian lumber imports following last Friday's unanimous ruling by a North American Free Trade Agreement North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), accord establishing a free-trade zone in North America; it was signed in 1992 by Canada, Mexico, and the United States and took effect on Jan. 1, 1994.  panel that Canada does not subsidize its lumber industry.

"This marks the sixth time in the past three years that a NAFTA NAFTA
 in full North American Free Trade Agreement

Trade pact signed by Canada, the U.S., and Mexico in 1992, which took effect in 1994. Inspired by the success of the European Community in reducing trade barriers among its members, NAFTA created the world's
 panel has found no justification for the U.S. to be imposing countervailing duties Countervailing duties are a means to restrict international trade in cases where imports are subsidized by a foreign country and hurt domestic producers. According to WTO rules, a country can launch its own investigation and decide to charge extra duties, provided such additional  on Canadian lumber shipments into the American marketplace," said David Pressly, president of the National Association of Home Builders The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) is one of the largest trade associations in the United States. Headquartered in Washington, DC, the association organizes one of the largest conventions in North America, The International Builders' Show, which draws more than  and a home builder from Statesville, N.C. "It's time It's Time was a successful political campaign run by the Australian Labor Party (ALP) under Gough Whitlam at the 1972 election in Australia. Campaigning on the perceived need for change after 23 years of conservative (Liberal Party of Australia) government, Labor put forward a  for the U.S. to honor its legal obligations by eliminating these border taxes that are unnecessarily raising the cost of housing and refunding to Canada the duties that have been collected."

Currently, there is an 8.7% countervailing duty Noun 1. countervailing duty - a duty imposed to offset subsidies by foreign governments
tariff, duty - a government tax on imports or exports; "they signed a treaty to lower duties on trade between their countries"
 on Canadian lumber imports and anti-dumping duties averaging about 2.1%.

The U.S. government imposed countervailing and anti-dumping duties totaling 27% on softwood softwood

Timber obtained from coniferous trees (mainly of the pine and fir families). With the exception of bald cypress, tamarack, and larch, softwood trees are evergreens.
 lumber in May of 2002, charging that Canadian imports represented a "threat" to domestic lumbers. The percentage was subsequently reduced on two separate occasions, but remains above 10%.

U.S. law permits countervailing duties to be imposed only if a foreign supplier is benefiting from subsidies and U.S. producers are being injured or threatened with injury as a result.

Last week's verdict reaffirmed previous NAFTA findings that determined that the subsidy is below 1%, which under U.S. law means that the lumber imports are not subject to duties.

The U.S. has until April 27 to file an appeal to the decision. Last week's ruling has no effect on anti-dumping duties of 2.1%.

Several NAFTA panel decisions have unanimously determined that the Commerce Department was using flawed calculations to reach the conclusion that Canadian lumber is subsidized. And on Aug. 10, a NAFTA Extraordinary Challenge Committee upheld an earlier NAFTA ruling that found no threat of injury from Canadian imports. It also stipulated that the U.S. was required to refund the billions of dollars of duties that Canada has paid to date.

Although a NAFTA ruling carries the weight of law in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, the administration has failed to implement decisions that invalidate the lumber duties.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Date:Mar 29, 2006
Words:373
Previous Article:PB redesigns its own structure.(Parsons Brinckerhoff reorganization)
Next Article:Structural deconstruction nears for 130 Liberty Street.(Deutsche Bank building destruction contract for Lower Manhattan Development Corporation )
Topics:



Related Articles
Mayor joins fight against U.S.-imposed tariffs. (Timmins and Cochrane).(Jamie Lim fights U.S softwood lumber tariffs)(Brief Article)
Softwood lumber: fight for fairness continues. (Guest Column).(residents of northern Ontario communities are concerned about failed negotiations with...
Lumber price drop?(Construction & Design)(Canadian timber)
Ruling provides sliver of hope for forest industry.(FORESTRY)
Softwood 'biggest trade dispute in the world': end is near for U.S. trade battle, says OFIA.(FORESTRY)
Softwood wars.(Editorials)(Trade dispute with Canada threatens NAFTA)(Editorial)
Byrd on its way out the window: the law allowing the White House to give softwood duties to American mills is being phased out and duties have been...
A truce in softwood war.(Editorials)(Deal with Canada imperfect but welcome)(Editorial)
Ontario lumber groups sue over softwood.(AROUND THE NORTH)
Softwood from Russia on table at conference.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles