High costs of CT screening.Whole-body computed tomography Computed tomography (CT scan) X rays are aimed at slices of the body (by rotating equipment) and results are assembled with a computer to give a three-dimensional picture of a structure. (CT) screening has become popular despite the typical $1,000 price tag for the comprehensive X-ray scan. There can also be a hidden cost for each scan, of between $1,100 and $3,500, borne by the U.S. health care system, according to a new study. The extra expense results from the high number of harmless anomalies, or false positives, that scans turn up and that doctors must then check out (SN: 9/20/03, p. 184). Radiologist G. Scott Gazelle gazelle, name for the many species of delicate, graceful antelopes of the genus Gazella, inhabiting arid, open country. Most gazelles are found only in Africa, but several species range over N Africa and SW Asia; the Persian, or goitered, gazelle ( and his collaborators at the Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts General Hospital Health care The major teaching hospital for Harvard Medical School, widely regarded as one of the best health care centers in the world in Boston used a computer to model 500,000 pairs of people from 45 to 55 years old. In the model, one person in each pair underwent CT screening, and the other relied on doctors for diagnosis and care of disorders such as coronary artery disease coronary artery disease, condition that results when the coronary arteries are narrowed or occluded, most commonly by atherosclerotic deposits of fibrous and fatty tissue. , abdominal aortic aneurysms, and cancers of the ovaries Ovaries The female sex organs that make eggs and female hormones. Mentioned in: Choriocarcinoma ovaries (ō´v , pancreas, lung, liver, kidney, or colon. The model estimated how much sooner CT scans would find such disease and any difference in life expectancy Life Expectancy 1. The age until which a person is expected to live. 2. The remaining number of years an individual is expected to live, based on IRS issued life expectancy tables. that would result from the earlier diagnosis. The results suggest that for 50-year-old men, CT scanning would accelerate diagnosis in 2 percent of individuals, but that a stunning 90.8 percent of the men would have at least one false positive in their scan. Among this age group, scanning would yield an average life expectancy gain of only about 6 days, compared with conventional care. Yet subsequent tests would cost the health care system an extra $2,500 per person. The economic impact of the scans would be even greater for younger, and generally healthier, groups, the researchers report in the February Radiology. Gazelle concludes that CT screening for asymptomatic disease is "causing a drain on the health care system." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion