Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,633,203 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Hewes v. Magnusson.


U.S. District Court

PRISONER ON PRISONER ASSAULT

Hewes v. Magnusson, 350 F.Supp.2d 222 (D.Me. 2004). A state inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  brought an action asserting that prison officials violated vi·o·late  
tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates
1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example).

2. To assault (a person) sexually.

3.
 his rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the officials. The court found that the officials' failure to protect the inmate from an assault by another prisoner did not demonstrate deliberate indifference to the inmate's safety, even though the officials were aware of the inmate's past confrontations with the other prisoner and that they were currently housed in the same unit. The court noted that the inmate did not tell the officials that other inmates had told him that the prisoner was making statements about him. The court held that the inmate's placement in administrative segregation administrative segregation
n.
Solitary confinement.
 after he allegedly took part in a demonstration challenging a prison policy did not impose an atypical atypical /atyp·i·cal/ (-i-k'l) irregular; not conformable to the type; in microbiology, applied specifically to strains of unusual type.

a·typ·i·cal
adj.
 and significant hardship, even though the inmate did lose the possibility of earning good time credits. The court noted that no credits were taken away and he continued to receive legal materials during segregation. The court found that the officials had a legitimate safety reason for placing the inmate in administrative segregation, where the inmate refused to tell officials the identity of the person who had attacked him. The court held that the prison's library schedule did not deprive de·prive
v.
1. To take something from someone or something.

2. To keep from possessing or enjoying something.
 the inmate of his right of access to courts, even if the inmate's laundry duties and hygiene needs limited his access to four and one-half hours per week, and the inmate had once been denied additional library time. Inmates were allowed to use the law library five days per week during their three-hour recreation period, the inmate was permitted to take books back to his cell, and the single denial of additional time had no material impact on the disposition of the inmate's case, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court. The inmate had designated as "expert witnesses" a number of fellow prisoners who would have testified about prison policies and procedures Policies and Procedures are a set of documents that describe an organization's policies for operation and the procedures necessary to fulfill the policies. They are often initiated because of some external requirement, such as environmental compliance or other governmental  and would offer their opinions regarding the constitutionality of certain prison policies and procedures. (Maine State Prison)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:FAILURE TO PROTECT; case regarding prisoner abuse
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2005
Words:351
Previous Article:13. Ex-offenders.
Next Article:Stewart ex rel. Estate of Stewart v. Waldo County.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Smith v. Muccino.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Hewes v. Magnusson.(prisoner rights violated)(Brief Article)
Pack v. Artuz.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(Brief Article)
Tucker v. Evans.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(case regarding prisoners abuse)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Johnson.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(Eighth Amendment and equal protection rights)(Brief Article)
Whiting v. Marathon County Sheriff's Dept.(FEMALE PRISONERS)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Civil rights.
Failure to protect.
Mental problems (Prisoner).(Pelletier v. Magnusson)(Hallett v. Morgan)(Bozeman v. Orum)
Programs-prisoner.(Lile v. McKune)(Little v. Terhune)(Reed v. McKune)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles