Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,855 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Helium theory gets high-precision test.


Helium helium (hē`lēəm), gaseous chemical element; symbol He; at. no. 2; at. wt. 4.0026; m.p. below −272°C; at 26 atmospheres pressure; b.p. −268.934°C; at 1 atmosphere pressure; density 0.  theory gets high-precision test

The basic equations of quantum mechanics quantum mechanics: see quantum theory.
quantum mechanics

Branch of mathematical physics that deals with atomic and subatomic systems. It is concerned with phenomena that are so small-scale that they cannot be described in classical terms, and it is
 are so difficult to solve that theorists have no straightforward way to calculate the energies emitted or absorbed by even so simple an atom as helium. Nonetheless, by starting with a rudimentary rudimentary /ru·di·men·ta·ry/ (roo?di-men´tah-re)
1. imperfectly developed.

2. vestigial.


ru·di·men·ta·ry
adj.
1.
 model describing the behavior of the two electrons in a helium atom and then adding, step by step, the effects of more subtle interactions, they can make remarkably precise predictions concerning the energy-level transitions a helium atom can undergo.

Experiment has now caught up with theory. By making the most precise measurements to date of a particular energy-level transition in different helium isotopes An isotope a type of neutral atom but the number of neutrons is different from the number of protons in the nucleus. May be radioactive. Elements 1-15
Hydrogen

Main article: Isotopes of hydrogen
, researchers have performed an unprecedented experimental check on the details of these calculations. The results reveal close agreement between the experimental and computed values of helium's so-called isotope shift Isotope shift

A small difference between the different isotopes of an element in the transition energies corresponding to a given spectral line transition.
.

"With a hundredfold improvement in prevision [over previous experiments], this is the most precise isotope-shift measurement ever made for a multielectron system," report physicists Ping Zhao, John R. Lawall and Francis M. Pipkin of Harvard University Harvard University, mainly at Cambridge, Mass., including Harvard College, the oldest American college. Harvard College


Harvard College, originally for men, was founded in 1636 with a grant from the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
 in the Feb. 4 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS Physical Review Letters is one of the most prestigious journals in physics.[1] Since 1958, it has been published by the American Physical Society as an outgrowth of The Physical Review. .

The team observed the same atomic transition in two different helium isotopes: helium-3 (whose nucleus consists of two protons and one neutron neutron, uncharged elementary particle of slightly greater mass than the proton. It was discovered by James Chadwick in 1932. The stable isotopes of all elements except hydrogen and helium contain a number of neutrons equal to or greater than the number of protons. ) and helium-4 (two protons and two neutrons). Theory predicts that the mass difference between the isotopes will have a small but noticeable effect on the specific wavelengths of light emitted or absorbed by a helium atom.

To measure this effect, Zhao and his co-workers constructed a special laser that produces light at an infrared wavelength of 1,083 nanometers, matching the wavelength of one particular helium-atom transition. A novel procedure allowed them to measure the wavelength difference, or isotope shift, between helium-3 and helium-4 without having to measure the exact wavelength corresponding to each transition.

"With this technique, the difference of [wavelengths] can be measured much more precisely than the [wavelengths] themselves," the researchers say.

The agreement between the theoretical calculations and experimental results provides by far the best confirmation yet that the computational techniques used to model a two-electron atom really work. "It would be straightforward to do more precise measurements, but we've already gotten to the point where we're past the theory," Pipkin says. "There's not much motivation [to go farther] at the present time."
COPYRIGHT 1991 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1991, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:quantum mechanics
Author:Peterson, Ivars
Publication:Science News
Date:Feb 9, 1991
Words:377
Previous Article:Two reports take aim at asthma jeopardy. (curbing the death rate and danger from the mold Alternaria alternata)
Next Article:President's budget: rosy outlook for R&D. (research and development)
Topics:



Related Articles
As God's dice fall; was Einstein wrong and Bohr right? Experiment goes against the EPR paradox. (Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr)
Quanta at large: 101 things to do with Schrodinger's cat. (quantum mechanics on macroscopic scale)
Putting quantum theory to a nuclear test.
Keeping a quantum kettle from boiling. (quantum system research)
Querying the constancy of Planck's constant.
Riding the atomic waves: with the magic of quantum mechanics, an atom goes two ways at once.
Back to the quantum future: evading chaos to make quantum predictions. (Cover Story)
Mapping helium atoms' quantum states. (special tomography used to demonstrate that the motion of atoms has wavelike characteristics)(Brief Article)
TWO NEW PRECISION MEASUREMENT GRANTS AWARDED FOR FY 2001.(Brief Article)
A quantum fluid pipes up.(Physics)(helium)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles