Health insurance law criminalizes Medicaid planning transfers.Individuals contemplating asset transfers for the purpose of Medicaid planning for themselves or for a family member should consider that new criminal penalties could be applicable to such transfers as of Jan. 1, 1997. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1996. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website, Title I of HIPAA protects health insurance coverage for workers and their families when , signed into law Aug. 21, 1996, includes a provision that makes it a crime for an individual to dispose of To determine the fate of; to exercise the power of control over; to fix the condition, application, employment, etc. of; to direct or assign for a use. See also: Dispose or transfer assets to become eligible for Medicaid benefits. The new law leaves many questions on enforcement unanswered. A criminal penalty could be imposed on anyone who knowingly and willfully willfully adv. referring to doing something intentionally, purposefully and stubbornly. Examples: "He drove the car willfully into the crowd on the sidewalk." "She willfully left the dangerous substances on the property." (See: willful) disposes of assets (including by any transfer in trust) in order for an individual to become eligible for medical assistance under a Title XIX state plan, if disposing of the assets results in a period of ineligibility INELIGIBILITY. The incapacity to be lawfully elected. 2. This incapacity arises from various, causes, and a person may be incapable of being elected to one office who may, be elected to another; the incapacity may also be perpetual or temporary. for such assistance. The provision took effect Jan. 1, 1997. Currently, Medicaid applicants must declare assets that have been disposed of within the last three years, and assets that have been placed in trust within the last five years. The applicant could be subject to a period of ineligibility for Medicaid benefits if sufficient assets were disposed of during that lookback period. Typically, individuals engaging in transactions covered by these rules are planning for anticipated long-term care long-term care (LTC), n the provision of medical, social, and personal care services on a recurring or continuing basis to persons with chronic physical or mental disorders. expenses and have, up to now, factored into their plans the potential civil sanction sanction, in law and ethics, any inducement to individuals or groups to follow or refrain from following a particular course of conduct. All societies impose sanctions on their members in order to encourage approved behavior. of a period of ineligibility. Under the new law, however, such individuals also must confront the possibility of criminal sanction - either a fine of up to $25,000, imprisonment Imprisonment See also Isolation. Alcatraz Island former federal maximum security penitentiary, near San Francisco; “escapeproof.” [Am. Hist.: Flexner, 218] Altmark, the German prison ship in World War II. [Br. Hist. for up to five years, or both. The new statute leaves many questions about implementation unanswered. A congressional aide admitted there are "serious technical drafting problem" with the provision, and said it is hard to envision strict enforcement of it as drafted. The statute does not state whether the violation at hand would be a felony felony (fĕl`ənē), any grave crime, in contrast to a misdemeanor, that is so declared in statute or was so considered in common law. or a misdemeanor, which will make prosecution very difficult, the aide said. Also, consider that anyone in a position to be prosecuted would have survived the lookback period for asset transfers (that still exists from prior law) and actually would have applied for Medicaid benefits. Theoretically, this could result in the government bringing charges against someone in a nursing home. It is very questionable whether a jail term is a viable punishment under such circumstances. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion