Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,787,283 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Hammond v. Gordon County.


U.S. District Court

OFFICER ON PRISONER ASSAULT

Hammond v. Gordon County, 316 F.Supp.2d 1262 (N.D.Ga. 2002). Female former county jail inmates sued county officials and officers, claiming they were subjected to cruel and unusual punishment Such punishment as would amount to torture or barbarity, any cruel and degrading punishment not known to the Common Law, or any fine, penalty, confinement, or treatment that is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of the community.  in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment, in part, for the defendants. The court held that a claim was stated by allegations that a male officer required female inmates to strip and engage in lewd behavior in return for female hygiene items and toiletries toi·let·ry  
n. pl. toi·let·ries
An article, such as toothpaste or a hairbrush, used in personal grooming or dressing.

toiletries nplartículos mpl de aseo (=
, and that the officer was not entitled en·ti·tle  
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.

2. To furnish with a right or claim to something:
 to qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S. . The court denied summary judgment to higher jail officials in connection with a claim that they violated the Eighth Amendment by showing deliberate indifference to officer-inflicted harm of inmates. The court also denied summary judgment and qualified immunity for a deputy jailer who was claimed to have intentionally in·ten·tion·al  
adj.
1. Done deliberately; intended: an intentional slight. See Synonyms at voluntary.

2. Having to do with intention.
 inflicted emotional harm and assault and battery on female inmates. The court granted qualified immunity to an officer on a claim that he violated the rights of a female inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  by opening the door of her cell and allowing a male inmate to enter, finding that there were no precedents establishing that the conduct was illegal and the opening of the door was not so obviously unlawful that immunity should not apply. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, an inmate stated an Eighth Amendment claim against an officer when she alleged that the officer had sex with her, and the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity. But the court did not finding deliberate indifference on the part of an officer who allegedly offered a female inmate cigarettes if she would expose her breasts, noting that the officer could not, under the circumstances, be placed on notice that his conduct was unacceptable. The court granted qualified immunity to a jail administrator and sheriff from a claim that they were deliberately indifferent by not intervening when male officers required female inmates to strip in order to receive toiletries and instigated and participated in sexual activities with inmates, because the jail administrator and sheriff did not violate any clearly established law when they did not intervene. (Gordon County Jail, Georgia)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:female inmates alleges male officers of violating their Eighth Amendment rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1U5GA
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:363
Previous Article:Kritenbrink v. Crawford.(inmates alleges state of failure to provide no adequate due process procedures)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Nei v. Dooley.(prisoners sues prison officials for violating 8th amendment rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: COURT COSTS.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEXUAL ASSAULT OFFICER ON PRISONER ASSAULT.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEXUAL ASSAULT.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEARCHES PRIVACY.(Brief Article)
U.S. district court officer on prisoner assault sexual assault. (Failure to Protect).(Brief Article)
U.S. district court searches sexual assault. (Female Prisoners).(Brief Article)
U.S. district court pat search cross gender. (Searches).(Brief Article)
Hammond v. Gordon County.(female inmates sues county officials and officers for sexual assault)
Hammond v. Gordon County.(female inmates alleges male officers of violating their Eighth Amendment rights)
Searches.(Dye v. Lomen)(Farid v. Goord)(Saulsberry v. Arpaio)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles