Grim prospects for flood-ravaged R&D.This week, as the level of the Red River continues to recede re·cede 1 intr.v. re·ced·ed, re·ced·ing, re·cedes 1. To move back or away from a limit, point, or mark: waited for the floodwaters to recede. 2. throughout North Dakota North Dakota, state in the N central United States. It is bordered by Minnesota, across the Red River of the North (E), South Dakota (S), Montana (W), and the Canadian provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba (N). , researchers in Grand Forks Grand Forks, city (1990 pop. 49,425), seat of Grand Forks co., E N.Dak., at the confluence of the Red and the Red Lake rivers; inc. 1881. In a spring wheat, livestock, and farm area, the city has grain elevators, state-operated flour mills, and plants that process have begun taking stock of what survived last month's flood. Unlike their counterparts 75 miles away in Fargo, many will not be able to return to their labs for weeks--in some cases, months. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Human Nutrition Research Center in Grand Forks was among the hardest hit. On April 20, water began seeping into this facility, renowned for its pivotal studies, many probing the dietary effects of essential and trace metals, including copper (SN: 6/8/85, p. 357) and magnesium (SN: 5/3/97, p. 279). Though a comprehensive assessment is currently under way, Forrest Nielsen, director of the center, estimated that the facility suffered about $6.5 million in flood losses. Its annual budget is $7 million. Volunteers housed in the center since January as part of a long-term dietary study were moved to a nearby hospital for a few days, then sent home when that $1 million research project was abandoned 8 weeks early. Similarly, several outpatient studies were discontinued when researchers and subjects had to be evacuated from the town. Moreover, nearly 1,000 laboratory animals had to be destroyed when access to clean water and their special experimental food was lost. "Overall," Nielsen estimates, "we lost experiments worth about $2 million." One of his own experiments was terminated just a week before data collection was scheduled to end. While he hopes to see all the studies restarted eventually, it won't happen soon. "Everything is totally shut down," Nielsen laments from an office he's set up in his home. The center won't regain electric power in even half of the one dry floor for perhaps a month. Inpatient studies are unlikely to begin until August, he says, and animal work can't resume until the basement is cleaned and repaired--probably in late fall. More than 1 million gallons of dirty river water were pumped out of it just last week. Though the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks sustained an estimated $40 million in flood-related losses, only a few of its research centers took big hits. The university's 17 biology researchers all suffered some losses, notes department chair Albert J. Fivizzani Jr. Most must throw out enzymes and reagents that were not refrigerated re·frig·er·ate tr.v. re·frig·er·at·ed, re·frig·er·at·ing, re·frig·er·ates 1. To cool or chill (a substance). 2. To preserve (food) by chilling. reliably during the flood--supplies valued at perhaps $50,000, he says. Several also lost biological samples, some of which may be irreplaceable. A 6-foot-deep sewage backup in the basement-level biomedical bi·o·med·i·cal adj. 1. Of or relating to biomedicine. 2. Of, relating to, or involving biological, medical, and physical sciences. laboratories caused much of the estimated $10 million worth of flood-related research losses at the medical school. Among the equipment destroyed were three electron microscopes. "In terms of research at the medical school, this is probably the leading tragedy," observes biochemist Robert C. Nordlie. Flood damage to a network computer interrupted the medical school's E-mail and Internet access See how to access the Internet. , which could remain down for another 3 to 4 weeks, notes biochemist Barry Milavetz. The university's Energy and Environment Research Center also got clobbered. This $25.7-million-a-year nonprofit institute lost sophisticated analytical equipment valued at about $4.5 million, including an X-ray diffractometer A Diffractometer (Main Entry: dif·frac·tom·e·ter Pronunciation: di-"frak-'tä-m&-t&r Function: noun) is a measuring instrument for analyzing the structure of a usually crystalline substance from the scattering pattern produced when a beam of radiation or particles (as X rays or , X-ray fluorescence X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is the emission of characteristic "secondary" (or fluorescent) X-rays from a material that has been excited by bombarding with high-energy X-rays or gamma rays. spectrometer, three scanning electron microscopes scan·ning electron microscope n. Abbr. SEM An electron microscope that forms a three-dimensional image on a cathode-ray tube by moving a beam of focused electrons across an object and reading both the electrons scattered by the object and , and a molecular-scale milling machine milling machine Machine tool that rotates a circular tool with numerous cutting edges arranged symmetrically about its axis, called a milling cutter. The metal workpiece is usually held in a vise clamped to a table that can move in three perpendicular directions. . Since this hardware was essential to about one-fifth of the 200 research projects that the lab performs under contract to clients worldwide, it must be replaced, says Gerald H. Groenewold, director of this former Department of Energy facility. He says he hasn't a clue where the money will come from. While his staff of 250 scientists, engineers, and technicians are called state employees, they get no money from the state. Nor does the facility receive any money from the university. For all practical purposes, he says, the center is a small business that derives all of its funds from its clients--many of them corporations or governments. "As a hydrogeologist, I used to love water," muses the stunned stun tr.v. stunned, stun·ning, stuns 1. To daze or render senseless, by or as if by a blow. 2. To overwhelm or daze with a loud noise. 3. Groenewold. After the last 3 weeks, "I'm not so sure I can say that anymore." |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion