Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,489,100 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Green electricity.


Paul McRandle's treatment of "Green Energy" [Green Guidance column, January/February 2007] is a missed opportunity. Most consumers don't understand green power options, and McRandle perpetuates the confusion. Here's what everyone should understand:

First, buying clean electric power should be at the top of the list of personal actions to address global warming. At one stroke, for an extra few dollars a month, you can halt all your electricity-related emissions. (You can balance the small increased cost with energy efficiency measures that reduce your total usage.) In the United States, electric power generation causes about one-third of all global warming pollution. Buying clean power also helps support the fledgling renewable energy industry and brings costs down.

Second, you can buy clean electric power right now, anywhere in the United States. You don't have to wait for your utility to offer it. The way to do this is by buying Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). Contrary to what McRandle writes, buying an REC is not "offsetting your electricity consumption." When you buy an REC, you are literally buying clean electric power. Indeed, when you purchase green power directly through your utility, they may simply be buying RECs on your behalf.

To understand how RECs work, and get info on many other climate protection actions, visit 2People.org, an online social network for people committed to real climate solutions. Our priority is political action: making climate the dominant issue in the 2008 elections, but we're involved in many personal actions as well.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

PHIL MITCHELL

2People, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

Paul McRandle responds: In referring to offsetting greenhouse gas emissions by purchasing RECs, I wasn't using the term in the technical sense of "carbon offsets," which suggests "additionality" through the support of new carbon reduction projects. Rather, I was suggesting that where consumers' only local option is to pay a conventional utility for energy from a coal-fired power plant, they can purchase an equivalent amount of power from a distant wind-powered energy supplier to "balance" their emissions and encourage an alternative. (Editor's note: World Watch will be running an article on RECs in a future issue.)

COPYRIGHT 2007 Worldwatch Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:World Watch
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Mar 1, 2007
Words:355
Previous Article:Carbon crimes.(emissions and global warming)(Editorial)
Next Article:Rents and sustainability.(Letter to the editor)



Related Articles
Power of choice. (consumers' freedom to choose electricity sources and green power marketing)
Green power spreads to California. (electricity derived from cleaner energy sources)
DWP FINDS IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN AUDIT PUSHES DEPARTMENT TOWARD CLEAN-POWER DEAL.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
Remembering thankfulness.(Letter from the Editor)
Growing green communities.(Sustainable Development)
SL Green electricity purchasing program a model for industry.(Property Management)
Enlightenment.(letters to the editor)(Letter to the editor)
2 'GREEN' ELECTRICITY CONTRACTS GET OK.(News)
Going green for St. Paddy's Day.(PROPERTY MANAGEMENT)
More homeowners now demanding green living.(Special Report: Medical & Education Facilities)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles