Good news for pests could also help the local wildlife to thrive.Garden pests are likely to have an easier - and longer - life as a result of legislation that has just come into effect. On the other hand, our gardens could become healthier places as products considered potentially harmful to humans are withdrawn.
More than 80 products used by amateur gardeners to control pests, diseases and lawn weeds have been taken off garden centre shelves after the latest round of checks on active ingredients.
Gardeners who have them in their sheds are required by law to finish using them by December 31. The waste-disposal departments of local councils should have information about safe disposal.
The banned products include such well-known brands such as Vitax House Plant Pest Killer, Murphy Mortegg tar oil wash, the fungicide fungicide (fŭn`jəsīd', fŭng`gə–), any substance used to destroy fungi. Some fungi are extremely damaging to crops (see diseases of plants), and others cause diseases in humans and other animals (see fungal infection). Spotless, Cutlass, the labour-saving hedge-growth retardant and many types of selective weedkiller weedkiller
see herbicide. for lawns.
Some lawn weedkillers will remain on sale because the active ingredient they contained, dichloroprop, has been reformulated as dichloroprop-p. Other products, such as Jeyes Fluid and Armillatox, both based on tar acids, will remain on the market but will no longer be able to claim control of moss, lichen lichen (lī`kən), usually slow-growing organism of simple structure, composed of fungi (see Fungi) and photosynthetic green algae or cyanobacteria living together in a symbiotic relationship and resulting in a structure that resembles neither or liverwort liverwort, any plant of the class Marchantiopsida. Mosses and liverworts together comprise the division Bryophyta, primitive green land plants (see moss; plant); some of the earliest land plants resembled modern liverworts. . Again, gardeners cannot legally use them for that purpose after December 31.
Two reviews have led to this clear-out.
First, the Government called for a reappraisal of some insecticides because of concerns over their effects on human health. Companies marketing such products were required to produce additional data to show that they were safe to use.
Many decided that the income derived from particular sales could not support the cost of additional research. This means that several pesticides are being withdrawn for commercial, not safety, reasons - those containing chlorpyrifos (to control soil pests such as cabbage root-fly), dimethoate dimethoate
an organophosphorus contact insecticide used principally as a premise spray; capable of causing poisoning. Chronic intake causes salivation and diarrhea in calves. (sap-sucking insects like aphids), malathion (various insects and mites), permethrin permethrin /per·meth·rin/ (per-meth´rin) a topical insecticide used in the treatment of infestations by Pediculus humanus capitis, Sarcoptes scabiei, or any of various ticks; also applied to objects such as furniture and bedding. (various insects) and pirimiphos-methyl (Fumite greenhouse smoke cone).
Secondly, the European Union reviewed pesticides approved for use before 1991. Again, additional testing was called for if they were to be included on the EU list. This process is bringing the safety and environmental information about these products up to the level of more recently introduced pesticides. Again, some pesticides have not been put forward as the additional research was too costly for companies - from pounds 400,000 to pounds 800,000 per chemical in some cases.
Some of the withdrawn chemicals have been replaced with new products that comply with the current safety testing requirements.
For instance, the combined fungicide and pesticide Roseclear 2 has been superseded by Roseclear 3. In other instances, organic substances are fairly effective.
These are not subject to EU review as their active ingredients come from natural substances such as pyrethrum pyrethrum (pīrē`thrəm): see chrysanthemum.
Any of certain plant species of the genus Chrysanthemum (see , rotenone/derris, vegetable oils, fatty acids and sulphur. Biological methods, which are outside the review, are also available, mainly in glasshouses.
These use other insects to prey on To take prey from; to despoil; to pillage; to rob
To seize as prey; to take for food by violence; to seize and devour.
To wear away gradually; to cause to waste or pine away; as, the trouble preyed upon his mind s>.
See also: Prey Prey Prey the pests and can be effective, though they are fairly expensive and timing is crucial.
The fact remains that the range of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and other preparations available to home gardeners is now more restricted than 10 years ago.
The new situation will demand more work from enthusiasts who wish to maintain an immaculate garden but it may encourage them to turn to more natural garden controls, an important consideration as gardens are becoming more significant as habitats for a wide range of wild creatures.
Purely on practicalities, more gardeners will have to adopt organic gardening principles, especially when dealing with some fruit and vegetable problems. Choice of the most appropriate varieties and good cultivation - sensible planting times, adequate spacing, watering and feeding - will produce more robust plants which will be better able to withstand pest and disease attack. The use of crop covers, such as horticultural fleece, can be effective in keeping pests out.
For some fruits and vegetables there are now no pesticides that can be used, other than the organic types. The insecticide bifenthrin can be used on cabbage and other brassicas against flea beetles, caterpillars, aphids and cabbage whitefly. However, only one application is permitted during the growing season, so a difficult decision has to be made on which pest to target.
Bifenthrin can also be used on apples and pears This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the for details.
This article has been tagged since September 2007. but not on plums. With the loss of synthetic insecticides for use on plums and the removal of tar oil for winter aphid-egg control, aphids and plum moth could become much worse problems on plums.
New pesticides might be developed to replace some of those lost. However, in the immediate future, the reduced range of pesticides means greater reliance on those few that remain. This could lead to problems with pests and diseases gaining resistance to chemicals.
In the worst-case scenario, the inability to control the more damaging pests and diseases may lead to some plants declining in popularity as they become harder to grow well.
On the bright side, gardens could become more wildlife-friendly and cultivation skills could improve.