Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,734,713 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Gonzalez v. Narcato.


U.S. District Court

STRIP SEARCH

Gonzalez v. Narcato, 363 F.Supp.2d 486 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). An inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  brought a [section] 1983 action against prison officials, alleging violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. The court held that the prison officials' decision to prevent the inmate from attending a ceremony in the prison chapel conducted by a Catholic cardinal was reasonable and therefore did not violate the inmate's First Amendment rights to petition the government for redress of grievances. The court found that a corrections department policy that required all inmates being admitted to a solitary housing unit (SHU) to undergo a strip frisk search to assure they had no contraband contraband, in international law, goods necessary or useful in the prosecution of war that a belligerent may lawfully seize from a neutral who is attempting to deliver them to the enemy.  was reasonable and did not violate the inmate's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. (Arthur Kill Correctional Facility Arthur Kill Correctional Facility is a medium security correctional facility opened in 1976 operated by the New York State Department of Correctional Services. Arthur Kill is located in New York City in the Borough of Staten Island. , New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Gonzalez v. Narcato, 363 F.Supp.2d 486
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:147
Previous Article:Doe v. Moore.(SEARCHES)(violation of due process rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Lashley v. Wakefield.(Lashley v. Wakefield, 367 F.Supp.2d 461)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court searches. (Female Prisoners).(Brief Article)
U.S. district court searches. (Pretrial Detention).(Brief Article)
U.S. district court strip search. (Searches).(Brief Article)
Gonzalez v. Cecil County, Maryland.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Gonzalez-Mercado v. Municipality of Guaynabo.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Gonzalez v. Litscher.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Adler v. Menifee.(violation of ex post facto laws)(Brief Article)
Gonzalez v. Narcato.(Gonzalez v. Narcato, 363 F.Supp.2d 486 )(Brief Article)
Gonzalez v. Narcato.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Gonzalez v. Narcato.(RELIGION)(violation of prisoners rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles