Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,050 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against TASER International, Inc.


SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden  -- The law firm of Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  filed a class action lawsuit class action lawsuit

A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax
 on January 12, 2005, on behalf of investors in TASER International TASER International, Inc. (NASDAQ: TASR) is a developer, manufacturer, and distributor of less-lethal[1] electroshock guns in the United States. It is based at Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. It makes Tasers, the most common brand of electroshock gun. , Inc. (NASDAQ NASDAQ
 in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations

U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on
:TASR TASR Tlacova Agentura Slovenskej Republiky (News Agency of the Slovak Republic)
TASR Terminal Airport Surveillance Radar
TASR Tactical Automated Situational Receiver
TASR Telecommunication Assessment Survey Report
) ("TASER Ta·ser  

A trademark used for a high-voltage stun gun.
" or "the Company") who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of TASER, between November 4, 2004 and January 6, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The lawsuit asserts claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

If you wish to discuss this action or your rights as an investor in TASER, please contact Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP toll-free at (866) 981-4800. A copy of the complaint is available from the Court, or can be viewed on Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP's website at: http://www.girardgibbs.com/TASER.html.

The class action, captioned Guzman v. TASER International, Inc., et al, CV05-0142 PHXMHM, is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona The United States District Court for the District of Arizona is the Federal district court whose jurisdiction is the state of Arizona.

The United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona represents the United States in civil and criminal litigation in this court.
. The class action is brought against defendants TASER International, Inc., Patrick W. Smith, Thomas Smith, Thomas (active in Mass. 1650–90) painter. He is identified tentatively as Captain (or Major) Thomas Smith who arrived in Boston from Bermuda (1650). An attributed painting is Self-Portrait (c.  P. Smith, Phillips W. Smith, Kathleen C. Hanrahan and Daniel M. Behrendt ("Defendants").

According to the complaint, Defendants falsely touted the safety of TASER stun guns and engaged in sales of stun guns merely to meet end-of-year projections. Specifically, throughout the Class Period, Defendants issued numerous positive statements concerning the demand for the Company's TASER devices and the safety of the Company's products. These statements, however, were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose: (i) that, contrary to Defendants' representations, the studies conducted on the Company's TASER devices were inconclusive as to their safety; (ii) that TASER's revenues and earnings would be negatively impacted once the truth of these studies was disclosed; (iii) that an end-of-the-quarter order of TASER devices which the Company had received from one of its distributors was done solely to help TASER meet its projected revenue growth and did not accurately reflect the demand for the Company's devices; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements regarding the safety of, and demand for, TASER devices.

After the market closed on January 6, 2005, Defendants issued a press release disclosing that TASER had received an informal inquiry letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the Company's statements about the safety of its products and a recent order received from one of its distributors. The market reacted to TASER's announcement by punishing the Company's share price, and on January 7, 2005, shares of TASER common stock closed at $22.72 per share, off $4.90 per share, or 18 percent, from the previous day's closing price.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of TASER between November 4, 2005 and January 6, 2005, you may, no later than March 11, 2005, request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
. To be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must decide that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP, or other attorneys, to serve as your counsel in this action.

Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo LLP is one of the nation's leading firms representing individual and institutional investors in securities fraud class actions and litigation to correct abusive corporate governance Corporate Governance

The relationship between all the stakeholders in a company. This includes the shareholders, directors, and management of a company, as defined by the corporate charter, bylaws, formal policy, and rule of law.
 practices, breaches of fiduciary duty and proxy violations. For more information, please access the firm's web site, www.girardgibbs.com. To discuss this class action with us, please contact the following attorney:
Aaron M. Sheanin
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA  94108
Phone number: (866) 981-4800
Email: mail@girardgibbs.com
Website: http://www.girardgibbs.com/TASER.html

COPYRIGHT 2005 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jan 13, 2005
Words:646
Previous Article:Jefferies Group, Inc. Announces Management Conference Call To Discuss 2004 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Financial Results.
Next Article:BV Financial, Inc. Completes Initial Public Offering.



Related Articles
Construction firm has history of troubles.
Eugene police set aside plans for Tasers.
Shocked to death: Tasers under fire.
Use of force, civil litigation, and the taser: one agency's experience.
Electric shock from Tasers can injure and kill, lawsuits claim.
The trouble with tasers.
Tasers continue to draw scrutiny.
University security tests Taser reception.
New packets help with Taser litigation and federal tort claims.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles