Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,799,283 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Getting off the failing list. (Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind).


Ok, the worst has happened and one of the schools in your district is going to receive a failing score under the regulations of NCLB NCLB No Child Left Behind (US education initiative) . But before you schedule an immediate vacation VACATION. That period of time between the end of one term and beginning of another. During vacation, rules and orders are made in such cases as are urgent, by a judge at his chambers. , or call the local newspaper and rail about all that is wrong with the law, there may still be hope.

It is possible to successfully appeal a failing score, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 Maree Sneed, a partner with the Washington Washington, town, England
Washington, town (1991 pop. 48,856), Sunderland metropolitan district, NE England. Washington was designated one of the new towns in 1964 to alleviate overpopulation in the Tyneside-Wearside area.
, D.C., law firm Hogan hogan

Dwelling of the Navajo Indians of Arizona and New Mexico. The hogan is roughly circular and constructed usually of logs, which are stepped in gradually to create a domed roof.
 & Hartson.

The first step is a basic one, she says. See if there is any basis for appeal by checking the accuracy of the data.

While the name of the law implies that every child's test scores will be counted, this is both true and false. Scores from some students are exempt from their school's grade, although these scores are factored into the district's total grade.

Any student who has been in his or her school for less than a year can have their score exempted from their school's score, Sneed says. States will determine how long students have to be in school to be counted within that school's test results.

The other possible exception involves students in a subgroup sub·group  
n.
1. A distinct group within a group; a subdivision of a group.

2. A subordinate group.

3. Mathematics A group that is a subset of a group.

tr.v.
 that is too small to be statistically accurate. (Typically, this is about 30 students, but again, each state determines the limit.) These students, who can include special ed or non-English speakers, would have their scores counted district wide, but not within any specific school.

These exceptions mean that in an extreme case, a district could have all of its schools pass, and yet the district as a whole could be considered failing, Sneed adds.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:D'Orio, Wayne
Publication:District Administration
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2003
Words:269
Previous Article:The customer is always right. (Editor's Letter).(school districts' purchasing power can dictate product development)(Editorial)
Next Article:Getting better by the year. (Hamilton City (Ohio) Schools).(Hamilton City Schools show improvement in educational statistics)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Another month, another change.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)
Report: NCLB fails.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Tutor successes.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Airing out old concerns.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)
An act to make no child more appetizing.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)(No Child Left Behind Improvement...
NCLB basics.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)(Brief Article)
Middle and high lows.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Solid foundation = strong standards.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
California reaches uneasy compromise.(Inside the Law: Analyzing, Debating and Explaining No Child Left Behind)(No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)
The Evolution of LD Policy and Future Challenges.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles