Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,588,435 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Gerber v. Sweeney.


U.S. District Court

HAIRCUT Haircut

1. The difference between prices at which a market maker can buy and sell a security.

2. The percentage by which an asset's market value is reduced for the purpose of calculating capital requirement, margin, and collateral levels.

Notes:
1.
 

Gerber v. Sweeney Sweeney

in poems by T. S. Eliot, symbolizes the sensual, brutal, and materialistic 20th-century man. [Br. Poetry, Benét, 978]

See : Virility
, 292 F.Supp.2d 700 (E.D.Pa. 2003). State prison inmates brought a [section] 1983 action against prison officials, alleging that they were provided with a nutritionally inadequate diet, received inadequate medical care, and were subjected to the use of excessive force. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 the defendants. The court held that the denial of the inmates' request for hats and gloves, and for shoes instead of sandals, to wear during outdoor recreation in winter months did not violate their Eighth Amendment right to regular exercise. The court noted that the inmates failed to show that protracted pro·tract  
tr.v. pro·tract·ed, pro·tract·ing, pro·tracts
1. To draw out or lengthen in time; prolong: disputants who needlessly protracted the negotiations.

2.
 periods of inclement in·clem·ent  
adj.
1. Stormy: inclement weather.

2. Showing no clemency; unmerciful.



in·clem
 weather, foreclosing outdoor activity, occurred with any frequency. The court found that the prison's use of unlicensed barbers to provide haircuts for inmates, and requiring inmates to share electric razors, did not place the inmates at a risk of serious or substantial harm absent any showing that the inmates were at any additional risk of contracting diseases. (Lehigh County Prison, Pennsylvania)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2PA
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Words:175
Previous Article:Cline v. Fox.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Lebron v. Armstrong.(writ of mandamus)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court: diet exercise privileges religious services visits.(Administrative Segregation)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Terry Ex Rel. Terry v. Hill.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Blanas.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(FALSE IMPRISONMENT/ARREST)(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(prisoners alleges violation of their constitutional rights )(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles