Georgia Gov. seeks to gut Church-State provisions.An effort by Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue George Ervin "Sonny" Perdue III (born December 20, 1946) is the governor of the U.S. state of Georgia. Upon his inauguration in January 2003, he became the first Republican governor of Georgia since Benjamin Conley at the end of Reconstruction in the 1870s. to add an amendment to the state constitution gutting the church-state provisions of that document has stalled for now. Georgia senators voted 35-20 on Feb. 10 in favor of sending the amendment to the voters but tell short of the two-thirds vote required. A vote to reconsider was pending as Church & State went to press. Republicans took control of both the Georgia House of Representatives The Georgia House of Representatives is the lower house of the Georgia General Assembly (the state legislature) of Georgia. Members According to the state constitution of 1983, this body is to comprise no fewer than 180 members elected for two-year terms. and Senate after November's elections. In the wake of that, Perdue Perdue may refer to:
Critics said the proposed constitutional amendment would essentially eviscerate e·vis·cer·ate v. e·vis·cer·at·ed, e·vis·cer·at·ing, e·vis·cer·ates v.tr. 1. To remove the entrails of; disembowel. 2. the state's current constitutional provision, which calls for a strict separation of church and state
Opponents also said the amendment is not needed, pointing out that religious groups can accept tax aid as long as they don't use it for sectarian purposes. Some speculated that the governor's ultimate goal is to bring private-school vouchers to the state. The Georgia Chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State Americans United for Separation of Church and State (Americans United or AU for short) is a religious freedom advocacy group in the United States which promotes the separation of church and state, a legal doctrine seen by the AU as being enshrined in the Establishment strongly opposed the amendment and urged residents to speak out. In a Feb. 2 editorial, the Macon Telegraph opposed the move. "This is one case where the Constitution should be left alone," the Telegraph argued. "And any vote against the proposed bill by members of either party should not be seen or labeled as an anti-faith, anti-God vote. That would be an unfair and dishonest characterization of their intent, to protect the constitutionally mandated separation of state-sponsored religious doctrine." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion