Genetic engineering's fishy results.Public debate over genetically modified organisms ge·net·i·cal·ly modified organism n. Abbr. GMO An organism whose genetic characteristics have been altered by the insertion of a modified gene or a gene from another organism using the techniques of genetic engineering. (GMOs) has largely focused around their benefits and drawbacks to human beings (see "Food Fight," cover story, July/August 2003), but a recent study conducted at Purdue University Purdue University (pərdy `, -d `), main campus at West Lafayette, Ind. is likely to lead the discussion in a different direction: environmental safety. Male Japanese medaka me·da·ka n. A small Japanese fish (Oryzias latipes) commonly found in rice fields and often used in biological research or in stocking aquariums. fish, genetically modified to grow 83 percent larger than normal, were introduced into a mixed population of unmodified medakas. Though the modified medakas mated more frequently, their offspring were less viable. In a laboratory setting, only 70 of the GMO GMO abbr. genetically modified organism offspring reached reproductive age for every 100 of the unmodified offspring, meaning that only fractions of the breeding population survive. "As the population becomes more and more genetically modified, there are fewer normal males that modified males compete with, resulting in a smaller and smaller population as time goes on, ultimately leading to population extinction," says Richard Howard, a Purdue researcher. The results of this study are the first hard evidence for the "Trojan Gene" theory, which" predicts that a genetic modification, touted as beneficial, may have unseen repercussions repercussions npl → répercussions fpl repercussions npl → Auswirkungen pl . CONTACT: Purdue University News Service, (765)4942096, http://news.uns.purdue.edu. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

`, -d
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion