Gamma-ray burst mystery continues.Just when astronomers thought they were about to solve the mystery of the origin of gamma-ray bursts--flashes of high-energy radiation that vanish without a trace--a new interpretation of a recent pair of Hubble Space Telescope Hubble Space Telescope (HST), the first large optical orbiting observatory. Built from 1978 to 1990 at a cost of $1.5 billion, the HST (named for astronomer E. P. Hubble) was expected to provide the clearest view yet obtained of the universe. images has revived controversy. In March, researchers reported that ground-based telescopes had detected the first known optical counterpart of a gamma-ray burst. A week later, the counterpart was too faint to be seen with telescopes on the ground, supporting the notion that it represented a cooling fireball fireball, very bright meteor leaving a trail in the sky that can remain visible for several minutes; often a distinct sound, perhaps caused by very low frequency radio waves, is associated with it. associated with the burst. Many researchers believe that the counterpart lies in another galaxy, clinching the theory that gamma-ray bursts originate outside our galaxy (SN: 3/22/97, p. 174). Hubble images from March 26 and April 7 reveal that the faint visible-light source has two components, a pointlike object and an extended feature, report Kailash C. Sahu of the Space Telescope Science Institute The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) is the science operations center for the Hubble Space Telescope (HST; in orbit since 1990) and for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST; scheduled to be launched in 2013). in Baltimore and his colleagues in a March 31 circular of the International Astronomical Union “IAU” redirects here. For other uses, see IAU (disambiguation). The International Astronomical Union (IAU) unites national astronomical societies from around the world. (IAU IAU abbr. 1. International Association of Universities 2. International Astronomical Union ). In an April 17 IAU circular, Patrizia A. Caraveo of the Institute of Cosmic Physics in Milan and her colleagues report that the visible-light source appeared to move. Detectable motion implies that a source lies nearby, within our own galaxy. Sahu and his collaborators say they find no evidence of motion. A third Hubble image may be needed to settle the controversy, he adds. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion