Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,491,278 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

GUEST WORKERS ARE GETTING HARD TO FIND ILLEGALLY.


Byline: Domenico Maceri Local View

FRANCISCO Barragan remembers the last non-Hispanic who worked in the California farm where he serves as manager. A Japanese immigrant came to his farm, worked for two hours and left.

There is no doubt that the vast majority of agricultural workers in the U.S. are Latinos. Many don't have legal papers. Because of the difficulties of getting enough people to pick fruits and vegetables, agricultural interests have been pushing for a guest-worker program.

That's what President George W. Bush has proposed. Yet, the Republican Party is against it, holding to its position that the emphasis needs to be on controlling the borders as the country tries to solve the immigration problem. That was the message sent by the ``Border Enforcement Bill'' passed by the House of Representatives in December of 2005. The bill focuses on preventing people from getting into the U.S. and tries to flush out illegal immigrants from the work force through requirements applied to employers. Approved mostly along party lines, the measure does not include a guest-worker program.

Setting up a guest-worker program would be beneficial for business because it would provide a reliable source of cheap labor. The agriculture and service industries have become addicted to paying little above the minimum wage for menial work. So, too, have small companies that hire workers at street corners for a day of work. Even major companies like Wal-Mart hire undocumented workers, typically indirectly, through the use of subcontractors.

But the crackdowns at the border in the last several years have reduced the number of illegal crossings. Workers for Barragan's farm are no longer easy to find. If enough workers are not available, crops rot, and that can be a disaster for agriculture, particularly in California, which is the nation's food basket.

Some farmers have been forced to advertise in Spanish-language radio offering $10- to $12-an-hour wages. But even that is not enough to attract enough people to pick fruits and vegetables because it is very difficult work.

The shortage of workers has also come about because of other jobs available in construction. As soon as farmworkers see that they can get steadier work in other areas that pays better, they leave. But even in construction it can be difficult to find Americans to do certain kinds of jobs. A Colorado contractor could not find people to dig ditches in spite of his $14-an-hour wages.

Bringing in people legally to do this kind of work would be a solution, yet that would mean doing something to deal with the estimated 11 million unauthorized people already in the U.S. Bush has stated that he is not in favor of amnesty. However, his rejection of the Minutemen Project, whose members he labeled ``vigilantes,'' has created an image within the GOP of his being ``soft'' on border control.

Bush is, in fact, taking a realistic approach to the situation. Most of the 11 million unauthorized immigrants have established roots in the U.S. Some have kids who are American citizens, some have businesses, and their deportation would be virtually impossible.

Bush is also not in a strong position to lead his party given his weak approval ratings, which are due to a large extent to the Iraq war. However, a guest-worker program that the right wing of the GOP would label ``amnesty'' would not be impossible to bring about. Bush could easily find support for his proposal among Democrats who would quite likely support it because it would benefit people already in the U.S.

A bill in the U.S. Senate sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., would do much of what Bush has proposed. Bush could thus work with moderate Republicans and Democrats to push the legislation through. It's really the only way to solve the immigration dilemma.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Viewpoint
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Feb 5, 2006
Words:640
Previous Article:LIARS, PSYCHOS AND CASANOVAS, OH MY!(Viewpoint)
Next Article:MORE THAN A MEAL CENTER GIVES LOCAL SENIORS SECOND CHANCE.(News)
Topics:



Related Articles
Illegal immigrants not entitled to back pay, says divided Supreme Court.
Imagining America without illegal immigrants: the millions of immigrants living illegally in the U.S. have long been a source of controversy. But...
Alien amnesty dialectic.(Insider Report)
Fix immigration policy.(Editorials)(Reform must focus on more than guards, fences)(Editorial)
FARMWORKERS' SALARIES FALL STUDY HIGHLIGHTS PROBLEMS FACED, SUCH AS PROPER HOUSING.(Business)
Amnesty won't fix immigration woes.(Columns)(Column)
Bordering on reform.(Editorials)(McCain-Kennedy bill provides best model)(Editorial)
Bordering on reform.(Editorials)(Panel takes a balanced approach on immigration)(Editorial)
IMMIGRATION DISCORD OVERRUNS CAPITOL HILL.(News)
Undocumented workers deserve protection, says New York high court.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles