Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,244 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Future of tobacco verdict is uncertain after Florida appeals court ruling.


The odd timing of an appeals court decision in a Florida tobacco case has left both the plaintiffs and defendant wondering whether Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. will still be required to pay the compensatory and punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer.  a jury awarded in June to the family of a deceased smoker smoker A person who smokes tobacco, almost always understood to be cigarettes Ratio of ♂:♀ smokers Philippines64/19, China61/7, Saudi Arabia53/2, Russia50/12 .

The Tallahassee appeals court, apparently unaware that the case had already been tried, granted the tobacco company's pre-trial motion to have the trial moved from Jacksonville, in Duval County Duval County may mean:
  • Duval County, Florida
  • Duval County, Texas
, to Palm Beach County, where the dead man's family and most of the witnesses live.

"[W]e find that... the trial court abused its discretion" in denying Brown & Williamson's request for a change of venue A change of venue is the legal term for moving a trial to a new location. In high-profile matters, a change of venue may occur to move a jury trial away from a location where a fair and impartial jury may not be possible due to widespread publicity about a crime and/or defendant(s) , the three-judge panel said. (Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Widdick, No. 98-894, 1998 WL 476268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 13, 1998).)

The court said Duval County's only connections with the case were that the plaintiff's lawyer, Norwood "Woody" Wilner, has offices in Jacksonville and that a defendant cigarette retailer is headquarted there. The retailer, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., was dismissed from the suit before trial.

Before the ruling, Brown & Williamson (B&W) had already asked the trial judge to overturn the jury's verdict, which was the first to award punitive damages to a plaintiff in a tobacco case. (Tobacco plaintiffs win one, lose one in Florida, TRIAL, Aug. 1998, at 18.)

In a statement, B&W President Tom Bezanson said the appeals court ruling, coupled with the reversal in June of another verdict against the company in a separate case, "clearly entitles B&W to a new trial in Palm Beach County."

Lawyers for the family of the dead smoker, Roland Maddox, disagreed, saying the location of the trial did not unfairly affect the outcome. Wilner has asked the court to vacate To annul, set aside, or render void; to surrender possession or occupancy.

The term vacate has two common usages in the law. With respect to real property, to vacate the premises means to give up possession of the property and leave the area totally devoid of contents.
 the ruling on venue as moot An issue presenting no real controversy.

Moot refers to a subject for academic argument. It is an abstract question that does not arise from existing facts or rights.
 because the trial is over and a verdict has been rendered.

Stephanie Hartley, an attorney in Wilner's office who is working with him on the case, said it is highly unusual for an appellate Relating to appeals; reviews by superior courts of decisions of inferior courts or administrative agencies and other proceedings.  ruling on a pre-trial motion to come after the trial is held. "There's no case like it," she said.

Chief Judge Edward Barfield, who wrote the appeals court opinion, declined to comment on what might happen to a verdict in a sitution like this.

"I wouldn't touch that question with a 10-foot pole," the judge told the Associated Press Associated Press: see news agency.
Associated Press (AP)

Cooperative news agency, the oldest and largest in the U.S. and long the largest in the world.
. "That's a whole different can of worms."
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Association for Justice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Shoop, Julie Gannon
Publication:Trial
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Oct 1, 1998
Words:401
Previous Article:Alabama high court rules no punitive damages without nominal or compensatory damages. (Alabama)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Punitive damages may be recovered from a deceased tortfeasor's estate. (Pennsylvania)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Class actions against tobacco companies win court approval.
FDA, doctors, lawyers intensify anti-tobacco efforts.
The many virtues of tobacco litigation.
1999 brings ups and downs for tobacco plaintiffs.
Keys to litigating against tobacco companies.
Tobacco class actions fire up: courts are certifying more class actions brought against the tobacco industry by injured consumers seeking damages or...
California high court limits immunity for big tobacco.
Tobacco class action goes up in smoke; individual and government cases proceed.
Cruise line liable for rape by crewman on shore, Eleventh Circuit holds.
Oregon Supreme Court upholds punitives against Philip Morris.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles