Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,574,623 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

From Norman Lower re "The task before us" (C.I., June 2007, p. 3).


In your excellent editorial, you have zeroed in the numerous problems seriously affecting the well-being of Canada.

You identify our country as "a dying Canada" and "a deeply divided nation" over unrestrained abortion. We can now certainly add another deeply divisive issue: the legalization LEGALIZATION. The act of making lawful.
     2. By legalization, is also understood the act by which a judge or competent officer authenticates a record, or other matter, in order that the same may be lawfully read in evidence. Vide Authentication.
 by Parliament in June 2005 of so-called same-sex marriage Noun 1. same-sex marriage - two people of the same sex who live together as a family; "the legal status of same-sex marriages has been hotly debated"
couple, twosome, duet, duo - a pair who associate with one another; "the engaged couple"; "an inseparable
. I remember the CBC's The National on July 1 of that year: Peter Mansbridge Peter Mansbridge (born July 6, 1948) is a British born Canadian journalist, CBC's "Chief Correspondent" and anchor of The National, CBC Television's flagship nightly newscast.  reported on celebrations in various parts of Canada and kept crowing about "My Canada." I could only think, sadly: my Canada? Not any more, tragically.

What do we have to crow about when we no longer are "the true North strong and free"? We hypocritically hyp·o·crit·i·cal  
adj.
1. Characterized by hypocrisy: hypocritical praise.

2. Being a hypocrite: a hypocritical rogue.
 sing "God keep our land glorious and free," all the while passing laws that are intrinsically in opposition to His created order, laws and commands. In a homily homily (hŏm`əlē), type of oral religious instruction delivered to a church congregation. In the patristic period through the Middle Ages the focus of the homily was on the explanation and application of texts read or sung during the  in September 2005 Cardinal Marc Ouellet His Eminence Marc Cardinal Ouellet, PSS (born 8 June 1944 in Lamotte, Quebec, Canada) is a Canadian prelate of the Roman Catholic Church. He is the present Archbishop of Quebec, and thus Primate of Canada. He was elevated to a cardinal on 21 October 2003.  affirmed (to a standing ovation in a full Quebec City church--I was there): "Notre pays ne peut etre renouvele que par des saints" ("Our country cannot be renewed other than by saints.")

Yes, as you say, "in Quebec, the clergy simply suspended any mention of family moral questions with the Quiet Revolution in 1960.... Only the arrival of Cardinal Marc Ouellet in 2002 is beginning to make a difference there." Indeed, at the present writing, the Cardinal is actively opposing Quebec Law Quebec law is unique in Canada because Quebec is the only province in Canada to have a civil law system. The Canadian Constitution provides with article 92(13)that the Provinces have exclusive rights over "property and civil rights", whereby civil law includes most aspects of  95, which by September 2008 will be enforced in all Quebec schools, both private and public. It will "suppress and eliminate all traditional confessional religious instruction from Quebec Schools, replacing this instruction by a course on ethics and religions conceived by the State" (from the Cardinal's Petition being circulated in the churches, emphasis in the original). Yet another assault on religious freedom by the secular state A secular state is a state or country that is officially neutral in matters of religion, neither supporting nor opposing any particular religious beliefs or practices. A secular state also treats all its citizens equally regardless of religion, and does not give preferential .

You say further: "In English-speaking Canada [and in Quebec also], hierarchy and clergy opted out after the 'birth-control' encyclical encyclical, originally, a pastoral letter sent out by a bishop, now a solemn papal letter, meant to inform the whole church on some particular matter of importance. Benedict XIV circulated the first known encyclical in 1740.  of 1968, diverting all attention and efforts to economic justice and assistance for causes overseas ..." This opting out has packed a double whammy double whammy
Noun

informal a devastating setback made up of two elements

double whammy n (col) → palo doble

double whammy n (inf
:

First, priorities became muddled. Professor Donald De Marco points out: "The horse should precede the cart; the Commandment to love God takes precedence over the Commandment to love one's neighbour.... It seems reasonable to interpret John 6 as an unrebuttable argument for placing the importance of the Eucharist ahead of that of social justice ... Social justice is a divine mandate. It cannot be ignored. But the life, for Christians, that animates their social justice activities, is Christ's own life, for without Him we can do nothing (John 15:4)" ("Social justice: Food that will last," C.I., Feb. 2004, pp. 27-8).

Second, the Canadian bishops in 1968 published their "Winnipeg Statement" with its skewed skewed

curve of a usually unimodal distribution with one tail drawn out more than the other and the median will lie above or below the mean.

skewed Epidemiology adjective Referring to an asymmetrical distribution of a population or of data
 teaching on conscience (paragraph 26). In the words of Dr. De Marco: "[V]arious Catholic bishops responded to Humanae vitae by placing a disproportionate amount of emphasis on conscience, thereby virtually de-emphasizing the role of knowledge, especially knowledge of the nature of the human being and the nature of sexual union" (New Perspectives in Contraception, 1999, p. 76). Dr. De Marco illustrates by quoting from the statements of four Episcopal conferences, including the Canadian (cf. paragraph 26).

"People must speak up," the editorial urges, "... write letters to editors, get organized for justice, freedom of speech, traditional families, and the defence of truth." For my part I use the written word, through letters to editors (some have been published) and essays to defend the Church's teaching and traditional marriage, to speak out against homosexual unions/ 'marriage,' and to continue efforts to convince the bishops to rescind their Winnipeg Statement. Concerning the latter, I thank you for your kind letter of encouragement to keep "informing new bishops on the Winnipeg Statement of 1968 and its unacceptable Clause 26" (March 6, 2007). I have been actively involved with this issue for a number of years; thanks to the inspiration and support of Msgr. Vincent Foy, this has become for me an ongoing and lifetime project, to carry on in his footsteps. I commend Challenge magazine for keeping the issue alive: on the front cover of the June, 2007, issue is a "Pro Forma As a matter of form or for the sake of form. Used to describe accounting, financial, and other statements or conclusions based upon assumed or anticipated facts.

The phrase pro forma
 letter to one's Bishop urging rescinding of the "Winnipeg Statement."

Let us end on a note of Christian hope, and thank God for the gift of the Catholic Faith. In her unchanging teachings, the Church remains a bastion of truth and sanity (cf. 1 Tm. 3:15) in a world becoming increasingly insane. Said Dr. De Marco in a letter to me: "Things seem to be getting crazier by the minute" (Feb. 2007).

Quebec, QC
COPYRIGHT 2007 Catholic Insight
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Author:Lower, Norman
Publication:Catholic Insight
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Sep 1, 2007
Words:765
Previous Article:From Mary Kennedy re online article "What is the Catholic position on in vitro fertilization?" (C.I., Oct. 2002), retrieved from...
Next Article:From Virginia Thomen re letter from John Nabeen to Mr. Alphonse Ainsworth, (C.I., June 2007, p. 6-7).(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the editor)



Related Articles
In focus.(editors' note)
From Carolyn Foster re sex selection abortion in India.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the editor)
From Charles Hughes re nature of universe.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the editor)
Corrections: July/August issue.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Correction notice)
1: Pope's letter to Chinese Catholics.(Vatican)
Renewed effort to defund Ontario Catholic schools.(ONTARIO ELECTION: OCTOBER 10 SECTION A)
Letter to the editor from Don Pennell re "Ontario needs the Family Coalition Party".(ONTARIO ELECTION: OCTOBER 10 SECTION B)(Letter to the editor)
Letter to the editor from Tom Smaak.(ELECTION: FUTURE OF CANADA SECTION B)(Letter to the editor)
Letters to the editor.(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles